Russian Armed Forces More Powerful Than NATO

This is what the neo cons are hoping for, that they can destroy Russia economically. Well they have six months to do it in, because after that there will be a price jump in oil. All the US oil reserves will be dry.

In the meantime Washington is destroying the EU, Saudi Arabia, the American fracking industry, the European fracking industry, Venezuela, and Nigeria. Not to mention the countries Washington has deliberately destroyed to hurt Russia like: Serbia, Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Ukraine.

As Vladimir Putin said at the UN in reference to the US: "Do you at least realize what you have done?"

 

Oil reserves will be dry? What the actual (*)(*)(*)(*) are to talking about? In a few years the US will be producing more oil then Russia and Saudi Arabia combined. God you are desperate.

- - - Updated - - -

And all 3 of those things are as fake as your claim of being an American.

 

Russia begins to produce all his own. It creates new businesses. Create new jobs. All is well. You do not have to worry. When Alaska, California and New York will be part of Russia, you will be see it yourself.

 

Ahaha. you do not have to worry about the Russian. You better think of how you will feed the Arabs and Africans. Or they will eat Swedes. By the way, soon the Arabs and Africans will not only molest to the Swedish women, but also to the Swedish men. I wish you success in promoting tolerance.

By the way, how are the Swedish krona against the dollar?

 

I tell you, without regard to the United States, Russia, China ... or any other country. Question world wars - a question of survival of the oligarchs and corporations.
In China, the oligarchs under control. Now in Russia, thank God, the oligarchs under control. In the US and the EU - the power of the oligarchs. Therefore warmongers - the US and the EU. (Mainly the United States, because the EU in fact - an American colony), but this does not mean that blame a simple the American people. I believe that a simple American people became the first victim of a future major war.
Western media made zombies from many Americans. And the Western media prepare of them cannon fodder for the growth of corporate and the oligarch profitss.
Now it is known about the real reasons for the murder of Gaddafi. And it's banal oil money. But what happened to Libya?...How many ordinary Americans died in Iraq? How many Iraqis have died? How many were disabled? So what? Who needed it?
This is a complex topic. To understand the root cause of the great wars, it is necessary to understand the basics of the political and economic structure of society. But I do not speak English and to me difficult to write great lyrics.

 

You write nonsense. Shale oil production - bankrupt. Classic oilfield - depleted. You know the reason why a ban on the export of oil? Because of the lack of oil in the United States. Therefore, lifting the ban on exports - a bubble. And Jeannette rights.

 

Uh--wut? Who be his employer?

 

No, no; this can't possibly be true! Those dirty *****s are responsible. They are sending us junk and bad dog food, and we are not going to take it any more! We must attack them with vigor.

The Russians are no better than the *****s. They are still the evil empire. Our god Ronnie Reagan was right. They are probably still communist through and through.

The tee vee told me all this, so I know it be true!

 

Neither in a conventional or nuclear war, could Russia defeat all of europe. And if europe would be attacked by russia, the US would of course take troops from elsewhere to help.

Russians are paranoid. NATO isn't out to get them. Just look at this from the point of view of e.g. a balt. unless you are a complete idiot, you would see that the baltic countries have reason to fear russia, and that's why they joined nato. Same for all other east european countries. If russians cannot understand that their actions seem threatening to others, they are retards. you try to paint russia as some saint, but which country was it that occupied half of europe until recenty? Russia isn't innocent.

 

Traditional oil fields are NOT depleted.. and Libya was NOT about oil. Libyan production is quite small.

 

No, it is not bankrupt. No, it is not depleted. And how exactly does your line of thinking make any sense whatsoever? We have no oil so we decided to lift a 40 year old oil export ban so we could start exporting oil that we don't have? How stupid does that sound? I know it's hard from Russians like you to accept reality but it's time to face the facts. In less then 4 years the US will be the worlds number one supplier of both natural gas and oil. Suck it the hell up.

- - - Updated - - -

If you have to ask that then you clearly haven't been here long. Stick around. Should become obvious.


Never mind. Just read your next post. You're one of him.

And it's spelled TV smart one.

 

Remove the rose-colored glasses. US will not fight for Europe. Especially for the Baltic States. US spat on Europe.

 

Once again you write nonsense. The 1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) that banned crude oil export was the closest thing to an energy policy that the United States has ever had. The law was passed after the price of oil increased in one month (January 1974) from $21 to $51 per barrel because of the Arab Oil Embargo.
The EPCA not only banned the export of crude oil but also established the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Both measures were intended to keep more oil at home in order to make the U.S. less dependent on imported oil. A 55 mile-per-hour national speed limit was established to force conservation, and the International Energy Agency (IEA) was founded to better monitor and predict global oil supply and demand trends.
But today, the U.S. imports twice as much oil (97 percent) as in 1974! In 2015, the U.S. imported 6.8 mmbpd of crude oil (net) compared to only 3.5 mmbpd at the time of the Arab Oil Embargo.
Production of crude oil is higher today by 7 percent but consumption has grown to more than 16 mmbpd, an increase of 32 percent. At the time of the Arab Oil Embargo, consumption was only 12 mmbpd.

So, consumption has increased by one-third and imports have doubled but you no longer need to think strategically about oil supply because production is a little higher?
Tight oil is the most expensive source of oil. The principal tight oil plays– Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian basin–break even at $65 to $70 per barrel oil price today.
Congress’ decision to lift the 40-year U.S. ban on crude oil exports reflects the same misinformed and distorted thinking that declares that the world’s highest cost producer–tight oil–can somehow also be the world’s swing producer.
The 1975 export ban was enacted because of the disastrous economic consequences of becoming dependent on imports following the peaking of U.S. oil production in 1970. Now that oil production is again close to peak levels, U.S. have apparently forgotten that imports were the problem then and that U.S. import twice as much today as in 1975.
The bleeding in the oil patch will get worse and prices will plunge again. Year-end results for oil and gas companies will be the worst so far. The Federal Reserve Bank and Standard & Poor’s have issued warnings about bad debt in the U.S. oil and gas business. The tight oil companies have put the best face they can on a desperate situation.
But investors and their bankers should be out of patience. They should be tired of phony economics and tall tales about giant new reserves when the companies they invested in are losing billions of dollars every quarter.

 

About shale oil. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=438883&p=1065727335#post1065727335

 

They are bound by treaty. Its dangerous if russians believe such nonsense as you do. Attack nato and there will be a nuclear war, thats it. Dont be stupid.

 

You write nonsense. You have read this agreement?
Article number 5 of the treaty.
"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security ."
But Russia - a permanent member of the Security Council and has veto power. You know about this?

For example expressed concern. Or to put party diapers for NATO allies.

Again. Remove the rose-colored glasses. US will not fight Russia for Europe, especially for the Baltic countries or Sweden.
Or do you think the Americans are ready for you to burn himself in a nuclear explosion?

The North Atlantic Treaty http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm

 

USA is bound by the NATO treaty to defend any NATO state if they are attacked.

and there is nothing Russia can do about it

 

The US has always betrayed their partners. It is known to all....However ... Read NATO treaty.

 

NATO says if any member is attacked, all must defend.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=438883&p=1065727628#post1065727628

 

Thank, Jethro Bodine!

 

Oh, I get it now. I must be one those paid people on an internet so overflowing with forums that I will soon be the next Warren Buffet.

You should visit the conspiracy sub-forum because I am the one who killed Kennedy!

 

Come now, I shut your argument dow multiple times. Yet you use it again and again.Gadaffi was trying to unite all Africa under a golden dinar.


The IMF estimates that the bank has nearly 144 tons of gold in its vaults. In the months leading up to the UN resolution that allowed the US and its allies to send troops into Libya, Muammar al-Gaddafi was openly advocating the creation of a new currency that would rival the United States dollar and the Euro. Gaddafi called upon African and Muslim nations to join an alliance that would make this new currency, the gold dinar, their primary form of money and foreign exchange. They would sell oil and other resources to the US and the rest of the world only for gold dinars. Along with the uprising in Libya, international news channels on August/September 2011 brought several stories about Muammar Gaddafi's introduction of golden dinar within his "gold-for-oil plan" to possibly trade Libya oil on international markets.

Everyone knows that if Gadaffis policy came into play, it would spell ruin for the global economic market.

 

US appreciate own skin more than any contract.

[video=youtube;AaLvTZqXNmU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaLvTZqXNmU[/video]