Police in Norway Proclaim Oslo is Lost

Indeed. Unless its a thousand drunk Muslims in Germany on a New Year eve.

 

Well yes to an extend. For decades, The Netherlands took in Indonesian Muslims without any problems. Problems have arisen when Netherlands started to take in Turks and Moroccans.

But the Europe IS doomed, I think. The current wave of refugees will not assimilate, will continue on the public welfare, will breed and inbreed and will not change their ways. And there's just too many of them in Europe already, and more coming in daily. If the floodgates are not closed now, Europe will change demographically sooner then you think.

 

Yes, the fired Juan Williams (who is quite liberal) for wandering off the PC plantation for saying this on Bill O'Reilley's show:

"Look, Bill, I'm not a bigot. You know the kind of books I've written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous."

- - - Updated - - -

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664
https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/07/09/are-jews-a-genetic-race-or-population-12-examples-of-jewish-genetic-distinctiveness/

Its a little controversial and politically sensitive.

 

The flaw in your logic is that the percentage of rapes by Muslims in EU countries is dramatically higher than their percentage of the population.

Bringing in mass numbers of people taught to hate and assault Jews - and then claiming the problem are those who dare speak against this even with threats of prison - is exactly what being a Nazi is.

YOU are the one with the racist message as the outrage is not against "MUSLIMS." It is against Muslim migrants from other cultures where men from birth are raised to have abusive attitudes towards women - something in your desire to play PC psychologist you dare not mention.

As for your tossing blacks into this to try to play the worn-into-the-ground white guilt card? Throw ashes on yourself lamenting your race if you wish. It has nothing to do with mass numbers of ignorant, bigoted, xenophobic, sexist, anti-semitic, impoverished religious zealot migrants being brought into the EU by leaders who are a bizarre form of neo-Nazi leftists - and the desire of the President and Democratic Party to do so here as well.

 

It turns out it was around 30 (not thousand) who were employed by local gangs to do the robbing. The assaults, the same type of assaults that were occurring all around the world on New Years Eve (drunken kisses) in every city were, in this case, for distracting purposes in order to carry out the pick pocketing. No evidence of a rape has been found yet.

 

Says who? You and Al Jazeera, or just you?

 

Jesus said "turn the other cheek." What a ridiculous notion by the "prince of peace" who's philosophy of non-violence at all costs is costing Europe her future.

 

Why take Religion seriously if they are for Badness and not Goodness.

 

Lets attack the messenger and not the message.

THIS Happened After NORWAY Deported More Than 70,000 ...



www.thepoliticalinsider.com/this-happened-after-norway-deported-more...



So what happened when Norway which — according to the CIA fact book, has a Muslim population of 2.3% — deported 71,000 of those Islamic radicals?

 

Why is everything now considered racism? Is it racism when you have a group of people who's values are completely different than yours and they are in your country, going against your values? When they don't believe in your form of government or your laws? When they want to bring their sick values and laws with them and force it on you?

Is it racism when millions of people come into your country uninvited and you want to put up a wall to keep them out because you haven't enough jobs for your own people? I think many Americans have a warped sense of right and wrong and see racism in just about everything. Some creating it when it isn't there.

 

I think our own people, and by our own people I mean European indigenous population, who for whatever purposes try to cover up and whitewash Muslim immigrants crimes are more dangerous and cause more damage to our societies than Sunni radical Muslims themselves. They need to be exposed to ordinary people. What do they gain from covering up those crimes? How do they justify the state officials bullying the police and the media into silence?

Swedish example.

Massive Coverup Exposed In Sweden As Media, Cops Hid Migrant Sex Attacks
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...sed-sweden-media-cops-hid-migrant-sex-attacks

 

A) it exposes the stupidity and the inevitably disastrous results of a seriously flawed immigration policy, B) ipso facto it will lead to street unrest and worse, and C) it delays that unrest until they leave office meaining their replacements will have to clear up the chaos they caused.

Next question?

 

I guess the liberals don't like someone pissing on their golden calf of multiclusterf*&kism. Reality can be a b^*ch.
It's better to shoot the messenger.

 

What's the latest news on the Muslim rape gangs in the UK?

 

What State would be worse off with better aqueducts, better roads, and more well regulated militia.

 

1. Already responded to this exact same "critique" on this exact same thread, so I'll re-post it here.

"You're completely wrong when you claim that I "have a problem with the message but instead ... attack the messenger." As can be seen by my earlier posts on this thread, I don't have much of a problem with the message. In fact, I believe that the sexual assault of European women by immigrants is occurring (just not on the insane scale this "article" suggests). I just have a real problem with the messenger and they way the distorted "message" is presented. As I've repeatedly said, you can't trust an article like this to say anything that's true. Writers on the American Thinker are paid to find misleading and incorrect information on dubious websites (such as Poqari News) and then use that information to write deliberately inflammatory articles. The ultimate goal is to further brainwash average people into accepting conservative ideology as fact so that the massive corporate industry that runs the show can continue to push for interventions in the Middle East and get them from our increasingly oligarchic government. Meanwhile, average people are distracted by the "Muslim threat", as if that were the real issue, and accept this insanity as reality.

Moreover, the problem is that the OP and the entire article acts as if the half-truths and hysterical allegations presented are news and facts. They're not. Others have already demonstrated why the article has all sorts of journalistic problems. But my entire original point was that you don't have to do any investigation to know that an article that fetishizes Muslims as "invaders" and "barbarians" is going to have major integrity problems."

My opinion about the message buried deep within this neo-fascist mess is that, as I have said

"The sexual assaults of European women by Muslim men IS occurring (in Germany, for example, though I reiterate that hysterical, clearly paranoid reports such as this should be carefully examined so as to remove the small kernel of truth that lies deep within the half-truths). And European police should respond to that. However, they should also EQUALLY protect the (mostly innocent/nonviolent) immigrants from the neo-fascist Europeans who are also intent on violence."

Frankly, I don't understand why conservatives have so much trouble accepting that "articles" like this have (a) a clear and obvious bias and thus can't be trusted, and (b) are clearly a creation of the right-wing noise machine, which spins have truths like this to justify the same kind of policies and military interventions that got us into this mess in the first place.

2. This is even worse than the original article. I've rarely seen such obvious partisan propaganda in my life. You know, some subtlety is really needed if you want to at least try to convince people that you don't have a obvious bias and are actually trying to legitimately support your position with real facts, instead of coming up with wild half-truths to support a nonsensical position.

3. This link is hilariously wrong. They only deported 7,000 people, not 71,000, as this article claims. Which is enough to embarrass me, for your sake. Not to mention completely discredit all the claims made by the "article" in question.

"Deportations surged dramatically from September to November, possibly in an attempt to reach the government’s stated goal of returning 7,100 rejected asylum seekers in 2014. According to Norwegian police, a total of 7,259 people were deported in 2014, including 438 to Afghanistan. The government’s goal for 2015 is to forcibly return 7,800 people." http://www.theguardian.com/global-d...ackdown-asylum-seekers-afganistan-immigration

4. They didn't deport "Islamic radicals". They mostly deported immigrants seeking asylum, along with some foregn nationals in their prison system. This was not a move against "radical Islam", as the article claims. See https://www.truthorfiction.com/norway-targets-muslims-for-deportation-crime-rate-drops/. By the way, that website, which investigates internet rumors, labels this rumor a clear fiction.

5. I can't find any reputable website that confirms the "30% crime drop" mentioned here. I'm inclined to believe it's a neo-facist fever dream, like the rest of the "article."

6. Correlation does not equal causation. Crime has many complex causes, most of which are economic. So eve if any of the statistic here are true (not that that is even remotely likely), the basic premise of the article (that deporting immigrants lowers the crime rate) is baseless speculation.

7. This was one of the worst "articles" I have ever read. I don't think I have ever seen so many failings on so many levels: logic fallacies, statistical falsehood, grammatical issues, etc. The only thing good about it was that it was blissfully short.

 

1. If referring to Muslims as "invaders" and "savages" isn't racism, I don't know what is.

2. The vast majority of Muslim immigrants are peaceful and perfectly content to follow Western laws.

3. You do realize that Islamic Muslims exist almost entirely because of the conservative "values" you so love talking about, right? That those "values" were used to justified decades of military and political intervention in the Middle East, creating this huge mess?

4. Your statement that "millions of people come into your country uninvited and you want to put up a wall to keep them out because you haven't enough jobs for your own people" is extremely ironic. It was conservative policies that caused the millions of refugees you refer to. And it's conservatives who will support the "right" of massive corporations to hire those immigrants to work in poor conditions for low pay and/or export those jobs overseas. As for the idea of the magic "Wall" that will keep immigrants out, I can assure you that this is an idea designed to distract you from the people who caused all the problems in the first place; namely, the rich. The idea of just building a wall and then just not letting anybody in doesn't function, mainly because displaced people have to go somewhere.

5. In summary: The ideology of racism is a tool mobilized by the rich to distract average people from the fact that the rich and the conservatives they support caused all of these problems in the first place, and are actively continuing to do so. Even if all the Muslim immigrants coming to the Western were, magically, all terrorists, criminals, and violent, the ultimate fault still falls with (a) the failings of global capitalism, (b) the rich, and (c) the conservatives and neo-fascists funded by the rich. Indeed, it's the oil lobby and the military-industrial complex that's truly criminal and guilt of terrorism in this case. They willfully destroyed Middle Eastern countries to make a profit, creating fundamentalists as a result.

 

I make a motion to start insisting Persons of Religion practice their religion for Goodness and not Badness, at every opportunity.

 

There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.

 

Muslim rape gangs is not news in UK, in fact all over EU.
It is not politically correct to write about reality in the 'news'.


EU news

 

Why don't you tell us? They appear conspicuous by their absence or the media would be all over the story. Perhaps you know something they don't.

 

Sounds like a perfect description of politicians everywhere.

- - - Updated - - -

Have some of this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-32413502
And this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile One man; hundreds of victims.

 

I believe we should ask Persons of Religion to explain themselves in open court whenever they should need to see a judge.

There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers [or sisters].

 

but jimmy saville was white so he's alright, right?

 

OK..........it will be coming shortly.

But here's something about Norway:


Kit Daniels | Infowars.com - January 13, 2016 


Syrian "Refugees" Rape Three-Year-Old Boy in Norway



Middle Eastern “refugees” reportedly gang raped a three-year-old boy at an asylum center in Norway, police say.

Police were tipped off about the Jan. 6 assault on Wednesday by a person calling from a telephone outside the Forus Akuttinnkvartering center located in Stavanger, Norway’s third-largest city.

“We are investigating the case as if the worst thing has happened, we are talking about the rape of a child,” police superintendent Bjorn Kare Dahl told Stavanger Aftenblad. “We have no suspects yet.”




After the attack, the boy was taken to a rape crisis center and then a children’s hospital, according to local media, who also said the boy and his caretakers were later interviewed by police.

Nearly 800 migrants are staying at the Forus center, one of several in the far northern European country.

In a similar incident, at least 15 Muslim migrants, 14 from Syria and one from Afghanistan, were engaged in mass sexual molestation of German women during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne.