2 Arab-Israelis booted from Greek plane after Jewish passengers cry ‘terrorists’

Do you know how cliche your argument is?
Granted, I could care less about the Israelis and Palestinians. Idiots have been fighting over that strip of dirt for thousands of years. And still, neither side has the least bit of interest in a peaceful coexistence with one another.
You have no stake in this ongoing fight, so why the fake concern?
Is it the hip thing to do?
The only two narratives you are going to hear on this forum is that Zionist eat little Palestinian babies for brunch, and on the other side of the coin, Israel is the only beacon for humanity and democracy in the Middle East.
Yawn, (*)(*)(*)(*)ing boring, cliche, and redundant.

 

Obviously he is far more concerned about the poor Canaanites who are in the background protesting to return to their land that the Jews occupied for over four hundred years rather than the Palestinians who, unlike the Jews never had a nation state of their own.

In any case, the Jews now own the land and, have the power to return it once the Palestinians rescind their declaration of war and make peace.

 

So why couldn't jews live in gaza? Why did the arab muslims require all of them leave?

Why can't jews live in the west bank? Why are the arab muslims requiring all must leave?

Why can't christians live in gaza? Why did hamas ethnically cleanse most of them out?

 

Racism??????????????????????????? Oh Israelis are shaking in their boots.
First and foremost this term cannot apply to Jews, they have been most accommodating worldwide and benevolent towards minorities... how do you explain then, that the Arabs in Israel have multiplied 600% in 67 years?

 

Israel deserves to be shat on: serial violations of international law, the Geneva Conventions, apartheid, commission of war crimes-you name it and it has 'Israel' written all the way through. Oh, and I never mentioned 'Jews' so don't for a second start with the anti-Semitism accusations. I would condemn any government as loathsome as Israel's irrespective of the faith of its political component. "Anti Zionist"? Anyone in their right mind would be. Any country striving for ethnic 'purity' can very easily be likened to a particularly nasty form of nationalism which all Jews are familiar with.

 

UN Resolution 242, etc https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/634kfc.htm

 

Nope. They brought it to the UN. It's just that the US veto's everything against Israel. Hence the human rights council is quiet vocal about Israel. Even that American Jew on the UN human rights council says Israel is ethnic cleansing. He got a Harvard degree, and teaches international law at Princeton. Seems rather legit. Mind you,.. his opinion counts. Your opinion is a joke.

I think we all know the Jews ethnic cleansed 700.000 Arabs civilians. And Israel is still ethnic cleansing outside their borders to make room for it's Jews. I sourced that a while ago how 1000's of Arabs had to go in East Jerusalem. So shut up already with that played ignorant trolling nonsense of a game of denial.

According to the definition, that's rather irrelevant, since other parts fit the definition. So that makes it a yes.

The UN calls that violation ethnic cleansing according to their definition. So that makes you the liar as per usual.

They most certainly chose their reply. WTF you on about? lol.
They chose to reply that they are living in an apartheid state.

Neah. The law of return only applies to Jews. An Arab who got ethnic cleansed out of Israel may not return because of his ethnicity. Israel made that law so they could thieve the properties of 700.000 Arabs. Thats apartheid right there. The Israeli population knows it. Hence they say they are living in apartheid.

 

The UN, the UNSC, the international court of justice, all say the WB, Golan, Gaza and east Jerusalem are occupied territory. Heck even the Israeli high court agrees. And hence article 49 of the Geneva Conventions apply. And it reads something like that the occupier may not have it's civilians living on occupied land. Its the same article that says ethnic cleansing is wrong. We're talking about war crimes here.

And the excuse the Israeli government comes up with, is saying the Geneva Conventions, who they signed, do not apply to them. Hence they find ethnic cleansing in the WB and East Jerusalem, to thieve properties and give it to their Jews... perfectly normal. And so people objecting to what is normal are terrorists. While of course it's the other way around. People who at the point of a gun are ethnic cleansing with a lot of highly criminal civilians telling them to do that so they can profit from it,.. those are the terrorists.

 

I see. So everyone is a liar except for those who support Israel. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

Yes, the actual wording is 'transfers of the civilian population of the occupying power into the occupied territory, regardless of whether forcible or voluntary, are prohibited'. The pro-Israelis really hate being reminded of this. In response you'll hear the usual crap from them about 'anti-Semites in the UN', 'the Arab lobby', 'god promised us the land' among the usual litany of insults.

 

This statement shows what the thread has been turned into.

 

I notice you completely fail to address the valid points I later made in that post which absolutely vindicate my opening remark. You have the opportunity to refute them. I'll wait.

 

Anyone can see comments such as the above have nothing to do with the thread starter.

In this case it also blatantly shows the responder's agenda. It has nothing to do with the thread starter not a damn thing and everything to do with shatting on Israel as he says. That was my exact point and he made it for me.

Now may I suggest the thread participants discuss the actual topic and if you want to start a shat on Israel thread like its never been done, start another. Using the pretext of the thread starter to change the topic to shatting on Israel achieves what exactly? Other then prove how threads are used as a pretext to provide an opportunity to shat on Israel and not discuss the topic they claim to refer to, what does it achieve? Have any of the shat on Israel responders on this topic even responded to the first thread starter?

 

Your comments are not valid because you pronounce them as such. In fact your remarks have nothing to do with the thread topic . I also don't refute personal subjective opinions that are not based on facts. I only debate facts, and facts related to the topic not a new topic you now introduce that has nothing to do with the original thread. No I will not condone your tactic of ignoring the actual thread topic and trying to change the topic because you have nothing to say as to the orginal topic. You want to hijack this thread, I don't take you up on that.

More to the point I don't respond to childish comments like "Israel deserves to be shat on". To do so would suggest such name calling is worthy of refuting.

At this point when you make comments like Israel deserves to be shat on, you have zero credibility, none.

Your comments provided continuing examples of trying to bait with name calling and trying to keep attention shifted off topic to your name calling and so no I will not lower myself to the level you are now at.

Run along and name call with someone else.

 

Yes, there are a lot of lowlifes out there...

What's funny is we see 22 arab muslim nations ethnically cleansing christians out of the mideast - and these people are silent - but only complain about Israel, who is actually experiencing an INCREASE in arab muslim population in its borders. The world of Orwell and that of various lunatics is thriving today.

 

The US has veto power in the UNSC, where the meaningful statements are made, and the US blocks resolutions against Israel.

Besides, whether the UN acts or not is not part of any definition of ethnic cleansing. Another example of this is that we can find acts of terrorism throughout the world without asking the UN whether those acts were acts of terrorism.

I don't know of another case of a country carrying out ethnic cleansing against the people of a bordering nation.

Besides, our rule of law tends not to accept the notion that one crime justifies another - especially when the crimes aren't directly related.

 

It is important that we Jews are kept safe from potential terrorists. I congratulate the Greeks for their rightful action. The Israeli Arabs should be arrested in Israel, and thoroughly questioned to determine any pro-Palestine or pro-Iran thoughts. If found guilty, they should be imprisoned and the homes of their families demolished.

 

this is pure Fascism.

you cannot punish someone simply for their thoughts.

 

If its established that they harbor terror thoughts, we should, like we did in Gitmo.

 

there is no one in GITMO simply due to their thoughts.

they were all detained on the battlefield or part of an actual terrorist plot.

 

Some were denounced as sympatizer. Most has been released now, butu it did happen.

 

the israelis on the plane should be punished.

 

jews should be allowed to live in Palestine, as citizens of Palestine and not under Israeli soverignty.

 

Undiluted garbage... None of the above accusations can be attributed to Israel...
It is only the culpable conscience of someone that is in need of a cover up for some of the miseries of WWII whereby six Million Jews disappeared from the face of the earth... 3 Million of them were Polish Jews...

If you compare Israel's resume with those of the rest of the world, you will find that Israel record as pristine as it is now only awaken envy and jealousy of the 67 years of its primeval record.

To point your crooked finger of indignation at Israel with the above denunciations shows clearly within the shadow of a doubt that other cerebral elements are the factual hating decease that started 1400 years ago with Islam's hate against the Jews... Besides, your unsubstantiated remarks above have nothing of value since you could not illustrate your vehement hate with evidence to commemorate your need to champion a false cause. Israel and the Jews have been insulted through the years by professional haters and we still threading on ignoring that slander!

 

"...crooked finger of indignation..."

Now, please explain, in detail, why you believe Israel has not violated any international laws or the Geneva Conventions. Perhaps we can begin with your predictable denial that Israel has systematically used Palestinian children as human shields? That is a proscribed war crime. http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Libr...63439&contextid774=163439&contextid775=163434
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_shield#Israel