Britain First carries out Christian Patrol in Islamist hotspot Bury Park, Luton

Your the type of lesser poster that needs to start every post with an insult or personal attack. You're now ignored, as you have nothing of value to offer.

 

Oh? so you display your bigotry and then get offended when you are called out for it?

Please tell me where I went wrong in my assessment of your posts?

Run along, now there's a good boy.

 

Not the same. There are Jihadists in North America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. The others you mentioned are confined to specific geographic regions. Their scale of atrocities are nothing compared to that of Islam.

 

As I said before, countries have their own problems with crime, their poor and taking care of their own citizens. So no they shouldn't have to take on the burden of more poor and more criminals that will come from these refugees.

Ok great, I don't want you on my side. I couldn't be on the side of those who want to force other people to have to live along side 3rd world nut jobs who think they can rape any woman they please. Refugees my ass, which is why they are mostly young males lol. They aren't refugees, it's a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing power grab. An attempt to create bigger populations around the globe.

Yeah sorry, I am not down with pushing a group of people who's values and religion will NEVER mesh with the country they want to invade. Send them all to Mecca, let their own sort them out.

 

Thats nice, how many women did he rape again? oh no wait he killed a butt load of people right? Oh no thats not it, duh he had a child bride right?

Oh (*)(*)(*)(*) my bad, for some reason I was thinking about Mohammed, because you couldn't possibly be comparing Jesus to the refugees that are going around raping women, believe child sex is part of their religion, and enjoy killing people.

You silly rabbit. But yes, I would allow Jesus and PEACEFUL PEOPLE like him into our country. If muslims acted like Jesus then I wouldn't have an issue with them either. But hey, take that how you want.

 

how many refugees have raped women and killed a butt load of people? No, you are confusing him with his cuckholded father - Joseph.

The outrageous generalizations of bigotry. You certainly are a poster child.

And yet the vast majority of muslims do act like jesus or as they call him Issa. Might wanna actually look up how close many Islamic teachings are to Jesus teachings. Lots of differences, but just as many similarities.

 

well we can start with 600 women raped or molested in one night describing their attackers as the refugees or the like. You know, people like Mohammed .

And again, if you call telling the truth a form of bigotry, then yeah I am a bigot. Better than being a liar and a muslim rapist apologist.

And I know Islam has a lot of things just like christianity, I mean come on Mohammed basically plagiarized the christian religion and put his own sick spin on things to justify his lust for children and his dream of becoming a ruler.


Without Christianity, Muslims wouldn't have their religion, or it would be much different because Mohammed would have had to find someone elses religion to try and steal.
But hey, whatever.

 

NONSENSE.

no telling the truth is not a form of bigotry. It is applying the truth of a few to the whole where it steps into the realm of bigotry.
I don't know of anyone that is a muslim rapist apologists around here, but there are a number of liars. Who exactly were you referring to?

regrettably you know nothing of the history of the period and place.

Mo, basically did the same thing as the christian religion did, adopt elements of the jewish religion and add their own spin with their very own additional god. In Mo's case he forwent the additional god part and simply called that one a prophet.

Yes, EXACTLY like there wouldn't be any christianity with jews. and there wouldn't be any jews without the polytheism of the ancient world.

 

Excellent Post. Wow ...

 

Ya Yeah There are many on the Religious right who support such a thing and in fact there are a number of laws that have the stamp of theocracy... unfortunately.

My preference is to keep Church and State separate so we do not go back to the 1000 year reign of horror when Church and State were not separate.

The founders shared my preference and disagree with yours

 

There are a couple of ways a person can respond to being wrong. One of them is to say 'OK, I was wrong'. Another is to pretend you weren't wrong & just keep blustering. One of these courses requires some degree of courage, which is probably why it is the course less taken.

 

they need to be careful, what do Muslims look like

fanatical Christians attack fellow Christians for "looking" Muslim

http://www.northjersey.com/opinion/on-this-ground-zero-tolerance-1.320911?page=all

 

If you say so. If you can't tell the difference between a movement occurring on multiple continents compared to one contained to a specific geographical portion of one continent, that's on you. However, I'll refrain from insulting you and not accuse you of just blustering. I came to this site to discuss ideas, even with those I disagree with, so have a good evening (where I am it is anyway).

 

Oh I just loved this video.

More people need to stand up and get the message across to these Muslims that THEY ARE NOT WELCOME!

 

Where exactly was Jesus a refugee from?

 

don't you know your bible?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_into_Egypt

 

Ah, okay. I thought you were going into the old argument about how He was homeless (and a refugee) when He was born in Bethlehem. And yes, I've dealt with a few people who thought that.

 

(*)(*)(*)(*) 'religion' and (*)(*)(*)(*) the 'church'!

 

I responded to your initial statement, which I showed to be factually incorrect, and then your follow up, which I showed to be factually incorrect. Changing the parameters after you have been shown to be wrong is a bit desperate. If you can't admit when you are wrong then you are incapable of 'discussing' anything. All you are doing is reinforcing to yourself that you are right, no matter what opinions you encounter.

 

Okay. I should have specified on a large scale.

 

It isn't 'Muslims' we need to worry about, it's radical Islamists. If you had the slightest insight you'd realise that fact for yourself: I obviously need to remind you of 9/11, the attacks on the London tube and buses, the Canadian marathon and Paris incidents the list goes on (see link). Don't you see how 'close to home' they getting? Oh and they're still making rapid progress further afield in the middle east too, Afghanistan being the most recent country they taken. Have you read about that yet? So, if all this has given you pause for thought since your juvenile jibes about 'pantie-wetting' and 'whinging', it rather brings me back to the question I asked of you yesterday What's your (solution)."

And in conclusion I'll address your most recent question viz. How is the west with the most powerful armys in the world going to be over run by Muslims,' They don't believe in conventional warfare, they use more frightening methods such as urban terrorism to do the job. When there's a Mumbai-style attack on a shopping mall near you're really going to feel stupid. They're smarter than us - wake up and smell it ffs!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

 

Exactly right, they use the 'softlee, softlee, catchee monkey' method, and we in the west are walking straight into it like moths to a flame. It's very easy for the 'useful idiot' liberals and apologists for Islam to sit in their armchairs sneering about Britain First, but what they don't understand is that to do nothing is to submit, and that's going to be our downfall.

 

So why are you applauding a right wing group trying to intimidate people on a Saturday afternoon?

No you do not need to remind me, but we are in a war with Radical Islam and that means we will suffer casualties, as terrible as they have been they amount to nothing in the overall war.

You do realise that we helped Radical Islam in Afghanistan, because it helped bring about the end of the USSR? It is double standards and (*)(*)(*)(*) ups like Iraq that have got us in the state we are in.

Nothing juvenile about it, the whole idea of terrorism is to make people scared, as usual it is the most jingoistic who when faced with the reality that violence might actually be arriving at THEIR DOOR start acting like frightened children. Prepared to give up their rights and traditions so that they can stay safe. Those who call the west depraved and say a bit of "watered down Sharia law" might be what we need are nothing but cowardly traitors, prepared to give up their rights to save their own skin.

First, stop the demonisation of Muslims and anyone who looks "middle eastern" because all it is doing is opening up division within our society, it is Muslims who are really fighting Radical Muslims and who are suffering real casualty's. We need to recognise that, recognise who the radical groups are and stop backing them against secular leaders like Assad. Take Tunisia as an example, one attack and the government has stopped tourism to Tunisia. Even some of the tourists out there at the time didn't want to be forced to come home. The terrorists have wrecked the economy of that country and we with our cowardice are complicate in it. That is just one way we can help in a constructive way, but it takes balls. I want a leader who says there will be casualties, we cannot stop every terrorist attack, but that is the price we pay for democracy and freedom.

Here you go, they do believe in conventional war they just do not have the ability to fight it! Why can you not understand that, they do not choose terrorism, they have no other way. It is so blindingly obvious that if they were capable of taking the west on in a conventional war they would. But they do not have the ability to do so!

.
Do you really think terrorism is more frightening than conventional war, do you dare to think we are suffering in any way like those who suffered in WW2, do you think that all the terrorist attacks on this country compare with one night of the blitz?
I still believe that the majority of people in this country have a back bone.

No I am not going to feel stupid, I expect it. And if I get caught up in it then it is a price I am prepared to pay for my freedoms that were hard won by the likes of my father and grandfather in a truly scary war.

They are smarter than us, are you joking? Are you so blinded by terror that you think a bunch of morons prepared to give their lives for a sky fairy are smarter than us? Can you imagine what would of happened to a British bloke who during 1940 said "they are smarter than us"?

You think the west is degenerate, that terrorism is scarier that conventional war, that "watered down Sharia law" would not be a bad thing and now the enemy are smarter than us? Whose (*)(*)(*)(*)ing side are you on?

 

It isn't so much a question of 'more frightening' but one of an insidious wearing down of a population to the point that it demands the government to surrender in order to continue as a society. Despite all your gung-ho 'We're made of sterner stuff', how long would it be before you'll become afraid to go into public places like supermarkets, your local pub or restaurant, entertainment venues such as football and other sports' arenas, or send your children to school, or your wife shopping? Who can deny (apart from you, evidentally) that the West isn't depraved and obsessed with childish things like how many goals will be scored, or who's going to be booted out from the latest reality show? So I say again - we have become soft, depraved and hedonistic, and they are smarter than us; you may not have realised it yet but you soon will, and I suggest you take another look at that Wiki article on terrorist attacks and ask yourself again if it couldn't just as easily happen here. We lost the chance to take IS on nearly 4 years ago and we won't get another one. Now I'm moving on.