Prove Earth is a Sphere without using the word NASA

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Validation Boy, Mar 14, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. tomfoo13ry

    tomfoo13ry Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,962
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Oh, you'd like that wouldn't you? You'd get a real kick out of seeing him sail to the end of the Earth and then fall off and die, eh?

    Some pranks just go too far, bro. Vegetation Boy, don't listen to this rube...he's trying to kill you man. You scared him with your truthiness.
     
  2. whatukno

    whatukno New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    SHHHH! Cmon, I think he'll do it! Besides, the sea monsters will get him far before he reaches the edge of the globe, er I mean, he'll totally make it around the totally spherical Earth!
     
  3. Leo2

    Leo2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,709
    Likes Received:
    181
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Your closing advice is excellent, and I would suggest you follow it.

    Quite apart from the physical and documentary evidence of the Holocaust, it has been my personal experience, and great privilege, to have known a very elderly German-Jewish lady whose entire family disappeared into the Dachau camp, from which fate she narrowly escaped. I have known her all my life, and she was like a second gran to me - the significance of which being she would have no reason to lie to the child I once was.

    The 6 million number is only an estimate, but the precise quantum is immaterial. If that happened to only one person it was still a crime which should not be minimised to any degree (no matter how badly the Zionist state may act today). We are talking about innocent human beings who were starved, brutalised, and worked to death, amongst other atrocities - such inhumanity can never be justified, irrespective of the numbers concerned. To doubt it happened flies in the face of all the evidence, and is a stance incomprehensible to me.
     
  4. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,494
    Likes Received:
    2,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  5. AlpinLuke

    AlpinLuke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    6,559
    Likes Received:
    588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's simple to prove that the Earth is a sphere and not a flat surface.

    If the Earth was flat and the Sun orbited in some way around it, using math calculation we will record determined lengths of the shadows in different points of this surface.

    If the Earth was spherical, in the other hand, we will record longer shadows than what we will expect dealing with a flat surface.

    Ancient Greeks made that calculation proving that the surface of the Earth is curved ... not flat.

    I've made a draft

    [​IMG]
     
  6. digitalartist

    digitalartist New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2016
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    1. The Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment of 1925 proved the Earth rotates. Some thing a globe Earth would do but not a Flat Earth.
    2. Were the world flat there would be no need for a leap day every 4 years.
    3. On a flat Earth, the sun at sunset on a California beach would be about 17 degrees above the horizon and so would never touch the horizon. In reality the sun does touch the horizon
    4. Watching the sunset from a California resort beach with high rise hotels behind you. Once the sun has set you can see the sunlight still shining on the hotels and as time passes the sunlight travels up the side of the buildings. Not something that would happen on a flat Earth.
    5. After the sun has set, you can see sunlight on the underside of the clouds. With the most common flat earth model this wouldn't happen.

    I can give more if needed.
     
  7. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Each of the items you listed are actually proofs of a flat earth. You simply don't understand the Law of Perspective.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They never did use it with any accuracy sorry.

    They knew it was round which is why methods of navigation became more and more accurate when they figured out latitude and longitude.

    The method of using longitude had to wait until the invention of a reliable seafaring clock which was an essential piece of equipment for determining longitude.

    Before such a clock was invented only latitude could be calculated with any degree of accuracy resulting in many voyages which missed their intended destination and had to sail north or south along the coast after sighting land to get where they wanted to go.

    Your history is as idiotic as your science. BTW there is LAW of perspective.

    Once again without making up childish crap such as an artificial sun simply go on skype and talk to someone in New Zealand or australia. Ask them to point their web cam out the window at night. It will be daylight where you are.

    This is absolute definitive proof positive that the world is round and none of your obfuscation and pretentiousness can refute it. It will not work if your retarded flat earth idea is true. It is absolute fact if the world is flat the sun would be visible across all of it's surface or across none of it.

    Case closed you have been schooled now run along
     
  9. SMDBill

    SMDBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    260
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Not only that, have the person in New Zealand point their cam at the moon and save a screenshot of it. Then go out at after night fall in the U.S. and look at the moon. Compare the screenshot of the moon to what is observed. The moon is upside down in appearance from the U.S. to New Zealand because we live on a sphere and our head relative to the north pole changes position as we move from the northern hemisphere to the southern.
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no such law you just made it up along with most of your bs such as an artificial sin
     
  11. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well, looks to me like you have no idea how the FE model works. Since you don't have the intellectual integrity or respect for others to actually research things before you jump at the chance to parrot some garbage out of some Freemason funded textbook, I'm going to completely dismiss this massive Fail you just posted.

    Lol.
     
  12. BleedingHeadKen

    BleedingHeadKen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    16,551
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was not a fail.

    I stated facts which crushed you'd delusional model.

    It is not model at all it is idiotic fantasy.

    You are not responding because you know the facts prove you are wrong and you are too juvenile to admit it.
     
  14. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is as simple as watching the mast of a sailboat disappear over the horizon not by distance, but by it disappearing from the bottom up. This proves the curve.
     
  15. digitalartist

    digitalartist New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2016
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Guess you didn't understand.

    1. The Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment of 1925 proved the Earth rotates. Some thing a globe Earth would do but not a Flat Earth.

    It was a self contained experiment that used an inferometer with a perimeter of over a mile. Perspective had nothing to do with it.


    2. Were the world flat there would be no need for a leap day every 4 years.

    Perspective has nothing to do with the number of days in the year.


    3. On a flat Earth, the sun at sunset on a California beach would be about 17 degrees above the horizon and so would never touch the horizon. In reality the sun does touch the horizon

    Perspective has nothing to do with the math that shows where the sun would be at sunset and where it actually is.


    4. Watching the sunset from a California resort beach with high rise hotels behind you. Once the sun has set you can see the sunlight still shining on the hotels and as time passes the sunlight travels up the side of the buildings. Not something that would happen on a flat Earth.

    Perspective has nothing to do with sunlight hitting a hotel behind you.


    5. After the sun has set, you can see sunlight on the underside of the clouds. With the most common flat earth model this wouldn't happen.

    Perspective has nothing to do with sunlight hitting the underside of the clouds since in a flat world model, the sun never gets low enough to shine on the underside of the clouds.


    I do so love Flat Earth Believers using the all encompassing "Perspective" answer without really understanding one basic part of perspective which is:

    Objects do not change their positions relative to other objects regardless of distance. For example, clouds will never be below the Earth nor the Earth above the clouds regardless of how far away they are. In the same way, in the Flat Earth model, the sun would never appear below the clouds. In reality, if the clouds are not a solid mass, you can watch the sun go between the clouds and the Earth as it sets, disproving the perspective belief.
     
  16. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Don't bother posting links that someone else created. Think for yourself. I'm not reading your stupid link, btw.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I don't need to respond. I've long crushed anything you could ever, or have ever brought to the table. You're the one living in denial, Nazi.
     
  17. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Guess you don't understand the FE model.

    Michaelson-Morley experiment shatters the myth of a moving earth.

    Why are military instruments capable of painting targets at 100+ miles away, in a direct straight line with a laser beam if there's curvature?

    Why are lighthouses visible 60+ miles away if there's a curvature?

    Why has NAZA never produced one single authentic image of the "Globe" from space? Cause its not a globe.

    Why do international shipping routes completely avoid the southern "hemisphere's" oceans? Look at the Azimuthal Equidistant map, and you'll start to understand.

    How does Polaris NEVER EVER deviate from its centralized position if we're hurtling through an orbit, around another orbit, then around another orbit, within an ever expanding universe?

    Because we're not moving.

    Why, if the sun is "93 million miles away" aren't we all bathed in uniform sunlight? Duh.

    Get a grip, my child.
     
  18. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thanks for the contribution, newbie. However, if you take out a telescope and zoom in on said boat, you will see said boat and hull in its entirety.

    You have a long way to go. Hopefully you stick around to see how it all plays out.
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do not necessarily need to but in fact you cannot.

    You have never crushed anyone but you have been embarrassed, humiated and proven wrong every time.

    It is you in denial.

    - - - Updated - - -

    No sir you would not see it in its entirety you would only get a closer view of the sails or mast or what ever is still over the horizon.

    You lose AGAIN
     
  20. clarah

    clarah New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Easy, you don't fall off the side when you get to the edge

    And you can see the earth from the Russian space ships. Russian mind you.... not NASA lol.
     
  21. cjm2003ca

    cjm2003ca Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    every object has three dimensions..if it was flat it still has a back side and width to reach the back side...like a piece of paper...next?
     
  22. BleedingHeadKen

    BleedingHeadKen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    16,551
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why not think of for yourself and provide the answer to these questions other than "the earth is flat."
     
  23. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VFhhCYYkILw
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zEqDbsPUgH8

    Video footage >>>MOD EDIT, Rule 2<<<
     
  24. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If you believe Russia's "space program" and NAZA aren't on the same team, you really have no business lurking around the conspiracy forum of this site in the first place>>>MOD EDIT Rule 2<<<. The FE model has no edge to fall off of.
     
  25. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Most questions any of the fools on this thread could ask are already answered before they even ask them, in the OP.

    it's a shame nobody on here seems to possess that vital skill we call "reading comprehension".

    What else should I expect from a bunch of sheep anyways, though? Who am I kidding?

    - - - Updated - - -

    How about you phrase an actual question... Then I'll think about whether or not you're worth my response.
     

Share This Page