Japan absolutely refuses to take in muslim refugees

Why should they? Japan not at war with them.

Let Europe, usa take them since they obsessed with middle East occupations.

 

It would never work here. Why? Because we import people by the millions whereas Japan actually has a brain attached to it's head. Plus they have 1/3 the population which makes it much more feasible to have a socialistic healthcare system.

Year Population Yearly % Change
2016 126,323,715 -0.2 %
2015 126,573,481 -0.12 %
2010 127,319,802 0.05 %
2005 126,978,754 0.2 %

I'd post stats for the US but there's no point. It's a linear increase per year.

 

A fella could get whiplash trying to follow the right wing ping-pong between the "We should do this (fill in harsh policy) like (fill in foreign country) does!" and "Foreign countries have NOTHING to teach us about ANYTHING because they're FOREIGN!" positions du jour.
We should be like Communist China but Canada is a socialist hellhole of weak degenerates.
Amazing stuff, the fever swamp.

 

You didn't even read your own thread title or post. Good God. What part of "muslims(sic" in the htread title and main post am I missing. If you are confused by your own thread title and post you can only imagine how the rest of us feel.

- - - Updated - - -

Maybe this will help.

 

Absolutely not. Just because a country makes a great decision, doesn't mean you need to copy their other ones. However, we should absolutely adopt their smart and safe policy of not allowing terrorists into their nation.

 

This topic comes up every few months. It has been debunked every time - Japan does not accept any immigrants. The original article does not mention Muslims. "Jewsnews"

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, it is so good to see the "Righties" in favour of providing financial and emotional support to those homeless! - there are so many posts stating that they are in favour of "their" taxes going towards helping those homeless.

 

And yet, if you are a foreigner of a different race (or not) living there (or visiting), you are perfectly safe. They are even extremely friendly (once you understand they are not ignoring you but are just shy and logically can't presume you speak Japanese). Practical in safeguarding their own, yet not racist (except probably in the eyes of the liberal thought police, where everyone, except themselves, qualifies as racist.)

Welcome to Nippon! (but they can be a little whacky )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8-vje-bq9c

 

http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2221.html

Not quite true....

 

Actually, the main problem they are having now is with illegal Chinese stowaways.

 

I was unaware we are allowing terrorists into the country, which is what you imply.

 

I've had permanent residence status in Japan for many years. The main problem, which is the same for many places, is the number of people who enter the country and overstay their visas, 90 day tourist or otherwise. Much like large numbers of Europeans in the US which you never hear about. And like the illegals in the States they keep their heads down as the last thing they want is attention. In the 90's there was a large number of single Iranian guys who were here illegally and who used to sell doctored phone cards (remember those?) and bad hash. Ironically, many of them sold knock-off/fake goods on the street. Always in partnership with the yakuza and/or the Israelis. It was quite the racket but no terrorism threatened. Every Wednesday a big Boeing would land at Narita and a few hundred Iranian guys would get off and disappear. The police looked the other way and got paid. The government did the same and got oil.

 

japan gave the world anime, waifus, and tentacle porn. If the world were to die tomorrow and one country were to survive I would pick japan.

 

Are you claiming we are not allowing the Syrians in now? When did Obama finally man up? This is great news!

 

I could care less if you cross the border illegally or overstay on a visa... Illegal is illegal.

 

Oh, sorry. I was unaware that Syrian refugees - even the Christian ones - consisting mainly of women, children and families fleeing from bona fide Islamic crazies and thoroughly vetted were really terrorists. I'm not privy to your highly classified intelligence reports, I guess. But as long as you are here maybe you can tell us exactly how many Syrian refugee terrorists have actually been caught committing or planning acts of terror in the Land of Liberty. Assuming that anything more than a bigoted suspicion is necessary.

Arab (Christian, Druze, Muslim, anything) = Terrorist.

 

So now you're flip flopping? First Obama welcomes them with open arms, then you claim he doesn't allow them in, now you claim he does again?

Are terrorists entering our borders currently or not?

 

You mean like their employer provided health care or the lack of funds for their national system?

 

I can put you in touch and act as interpreter with the prefectural police here if you are really concerned. Thanks for caring.

 

Leave Steve out of this.

 

Of course we are. Obama's security chief said we can not properly vet these people and that was when it was an18 to 24 months process. Obama changed that to 3 months.

 

What a blessing! Thanks.. As soon as i move to Japan i will start caring... Of course i was speaking about here.. You know the US.

 

Japan absolutely refuses to take in muslim refugees

Good for them and any other country that doesn't want to become a cesspool

 

I'll go slow so you can follow.
First of all, hard to prove a negative. (Are space aliens assembling an invasion fleet on the dark side of the moon?)

Some thoroughly vetted Syrian refugees have been allowed in. YOU apparently think - without any proof or evidence at all - that Syrian refugee (Christian, child, grandmother, etc) is synonymous with "terrorist". So by YOUR standards and YOUR definition and YOUR interpretation then - yes. By the unbigoted measure here on Planet Reality used by normal people - no. I'd ask you again for any proof or evidence of actual terror acts carried out or plotted by Syrian refugees on US soil but we both know you can't provide any.

Hatred and bigotry can lead down some pretty tortured paths of so-called "reasoning", n'est ce pas?

 

i dont think that was the point of japans stance at all. They can be 100% safe but japan would rather take care of their own poor people first rather than syrias.

 

Sorry, simple stating that it's so and wishing it to be true won't magically make it so. Japan isn't particularly culturally conservative. You don't have to believe me, but I've lived and worked there.

Strawman. I never claimed that the did.

My argument still stands and you're complaining about something that you yourself engage in.