A man in the country of Oman was riding his bicycle when he saw a stray dog wandering down the road carrying something in its mouth. The man noticed some drops of splattered blood and got closer to take a better look. When he did, he couldn’t believe what he saw. According to the man, the dog was holding a newborn baby boy in its mouth; the baby—perhaps only a couple of hours old—still had the umbilical cord attached. It is believed that the fetus came out as a result of an induced labor abortion and was then dumped in the trash. Presumably the dog was rummaging around in a garbage dump when the animal found it and carried it off. But that's not the end of the story, no, not at all. The fetus survived. What at first glance appeared to be a macabre situation turned out to be a miraculous occurrence, for in digging out the fetus from the dumpster the dog actually ended up saving the baby's life! This took place in the city of Kharbika on October 31, Saturday morning. Doctors reportedly say the baby boy is doing well. It's a miracle the premature baby was able to hold onto life for so long without medical attention after being abandoned. Authorities are searching for the boy’s mother. The stray dog was a female so presumably she carried away the premature baby out of motherly instinct. Female dogs are also known to pick up their little pups by carrying them around this way. Yes, I know, the pictures look horrible, like the dog is carrying off a dead baby to eat it, but actually this dog was very likely trying to rescue the little premature baby to raise it as if it were one of her own pups. Here you can see a female dog carrying a newborn kitten: A similar incident occurred in 2013 in Thailand when a family dog rescued an abandoned newborn baby girl at a roadside dump. Just thought this was interesting. See, something that seems so horrible turns out to be not what it looks like.
Even the dog had the sense to try to rescue and take care of the baby--a stray dog no less! This reminds me of the story of the Good Samaritan. <MOD EDIT - Rule 3 - Removed Flamebait>
What does this even mean? If I believe it is wrong to slaughter elephants and tigers, are you implying that I cannot voice my opinion until I adopt a certain number of elephants and tigers?
What a load of crap, the dog was carrying it away to eat which is pretty standard for dogs to do, and according to most religions a dog cannot go to heaven for they have no soul.
I so love it when pro-lifers ad-lib on these reports, adding in their own little comments as if they were part of the original article .. for one the NEWBORN baby was not considered to be the "result of an induced labor abortion" at all, to top that nothing of this has been reported in ANY Brazilian newspapers or on TV, in fact the pictures used first surfaced in Saudi Arabia in 2015 (http://www.emirates247.com/offbeat/...fe-of-newborn-graphic-pic-2015-10-30-1.608712 ) so unless that dog got a plane to Brazil the report is obviously fake.
The baby is obviously premature. Hmm, very premature baby dumped in the trash. You do the math. I will admit however that a lot of assumptions in the article were a little speculative. For one, we do not know with absolute certainty that the baby was dumped in the trash. But where else would a stray dog have found it? And I suppose a woman could have just given birth to a very premature baby in her home, and coincidentally she just didn't want it. But honestly, how likely is that? No, in all probability the fetus came out as a result of an induced labor abortion. That's the only plausible way to explain how a premature baby ended up being picked up by a stray dog. My post never said that it happened in Brazil. Do you even know where Oman is? It's right next to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
So basically then you are making things up to enhance the story .. nothing new there then. The baby is not obviously premature, yet another assumption by you. google the pictures and see where the report you almost word for word quoted (with no link to your source) came from. I suspect you copied it directly from here - http://www.lifenews.com/2015/11/05/...al-garbage-dump-with-umbilical-cord-attached/ - which quite plainly states Brazil. Best bit is there are photos of the dog without the baby and it isn't even the same dog , nor is the baby atomically correct .. it has no anus. Add to that what sort of sick person takes photos of such a thing before helping, and furthermore there is not a single report in any Oman newspaper either, oh and just to put some icing on the top the stories contradict themselves, with some saying the dog took it to a house and others saying it took it to the hospital, another says the baby was abandoned on the street, while another says it was in a dumpster.
There's plenty of loving families willing to adopt the white, healthy, and non-defective ones. So many families in fact that they often have to settle for a baby who may not be their ideal. I guess these women who want to get an abortion are out of luck.
There are obviously two separate stories. Some of the webpages out there are just using pictures from the other article, presumably for convenience since those pictures are already out there.
How convenient, tell you what when you can collaborate the story from an independent source, say an Oman newspaper or TV report and explain why the baby isn't atomically correct it might be worth something. - - - Updated - - - Says the person who is on record as wanting to murder disabled newborns.
Oh! This is getting good. I have to admit that I was really disturbed when I first saw the snausage-baby picture. I feel a little better knowing that it is likely a hoax. At lease we have a safe surrender sign at fire stations and hospitals. If someone had a baby they didn't want, they can just hand him/her over without any repercussions. All we need is for more people to adopt. Eh Hm! Adopt! Is there anyone here claiming to value these little lives, willing to put their care where there mouth is?
Ok, as long as this garbage is allowed here I'll try to connect it to the Abortion Forum. That story looks like it happened in a country where legal abortion doesn't exist and women don't have access to safe affordable abortions... That's seems to be what Anti-Choicers want the US to look like...
The person you asked this question of in this topic is on record as stating disabled newborns should be killed, all he is interested in is saving white, perfect babies and nothing else.
Oh, adoption. That doesn't have anything to do with abortion either so , heck, let's discuss. NO, there are so many babies and kids waiting to be adopted some even "age out" of the system without being adopted. Yes, there are people, NOT "loving" families, who want a perfect white baby( NO one is "loving" who specifies which "life" is precious or deserving of love). . So? Does that mean you only want non-whites to have the right to abort?
No, Fugazi is just desperately trying to deny and be skeptical about things that there's nothing to be skeptical about. If it doesn't "look" like a baby that's only because it's premature and is still covered in vernix—the waxy coating covering the skin of newborn babies. Normally newborn babies are immediately washed off after coming out, but this doesn't appear to be the case here. This is just more proof that the baby came out during an induced labor abortion and someone was in a hurry to get rid of it. If you watch youtube videos of premature babies being delivered, they don't look any different from the one in the picture.
I'm sure you do. Trying to ignore: """That story looks like it happened in a country where legal abortion doesn't exist and women don't have access to safe affordable abortions... That's seems to be what Anti-Choicers want the US to look like... """ ????? Thank you for presenting what may happen if abortion is made illegal.
I guess I am just hoping its not real. Getting back to this whole adoption thing, I am interested to hear about your personal experience with adoption.
nothing desperate at all, the fact remains that this story has done the rounds in a few different countries with various details changed, also the fact that the "baby" is not autonomically correct, and that other pictures of the dog (without the "baby") show a completely different dog and that there are NO reports of this in ANY Oman or Brazilian papers or TV reports, and why were photographs taken in the first place, leads only to the conclusion it is fake. That is nothing but assumption on your part, you have nothing to support that it was due to an induced labour abortion, also your vernix idea does not hold up, a premature birth with the vernix still showing does not look remotely like the pictures in your OP http://www.parentspowwow.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/vernix.jpg Yes they do. I have been present at two premature births (both of my sons) and they looked nothing like the picture.
Hey, I help you out by connecting your ridiculous fairy tale OP with abortion....and you can't respond? Why not? Did you have some other point you were trying to make ?? What was it? If I ask enough Inconvenient questions will you hide until you post another bizarre irrelevant story like you usually do ?
