Should White Students be Allowed to Establish Student Groups Based on Race?

What power do whites supposedly have over everyone else?

Do you have a tracking index so we know the exact moment power whites hold is shared equally with another group?

 

No one has stopped those groups from forming. They HAVE stopped groups in the same vein that had "white" or "Caucasian" etc in the name even though those groups were likewise inclusive and ALL other things were entirely equal/the same except for the particular race.

 

Why does supposed mistreatment which is no longer relevant today bar whites from forming white student groups?

What is the need for Asian groups when Asians are more successful than whites and there is no official discrimination against Asians or any other ethno-racial group?

 

Then that to me is discrimination based on race, regardless of the minority or majority race population groups that do not or cannot ban membership should be allowed regardless of their ethnic origins.

 

Some Liberals just hate White people, they've got a knee jerk reaction to White people.

 

So what? There are more females than males.

I hope I don't need to guide you through the implication of your own line of logic.

 

The first amendment to the Constitution gurantees the right to peacefully assemble.

- - - Updated - - -

Unconstitutional to do so....everyone has a right to peacefully assemble.

 

Forming ethical groups is a minority thing. If the majority holds ethical groups, these would typically exists to deny minorities stuff and assert their exclusive dominance.

 

Amazing how many do not know the Constitution gurantees the right of everyone to peacefully assemble....just goes to show how political correctness has been programmed into people.

 

they have a constitutional right OFF campus to form any organization they want... but ON campus they do not have a right to form any group linked to the college...

see the slight difference? the topic is about university groups formed... not groups outside of the university... its an important difference... the government can't support the racism using its facilities and usually budgets give to groups created on campus... if those students want to be racist and form groups and self-fund them off campus, they can... but not on campus using the universities facilities and money to fund them...

 

...but they can support the racism of everyone who isn't white? What about equal treatment under the law?

 

I clearly cited in another response, those groups on campus, that are racist now, should be disassembled and stopped... the solution shouldn't be, add more racist groups...

do you not understand that very simple point?

 

The most picked on people in Hollywood, and the media, are White groups such as Italians, Polish, French, Southern Whites, and so forth.

 

That may be school policy but I still say it would be unconstitutional...racism is not a crime....and just because the organization would be for whites is no more racist than a black group forming an organization for blacks.

To allow black students to form a union but to deny whites the same ability is discrimination....plain and simple...but do not expect anyone to appeal it...most are too afraid of being labeled a waycist.

 

So females should be prevented from forming groups because they are the majority?

 

I understand that, but as long as those existing groups are allowed, equal treatment under the law demands that everyone, regardless of race, be allowed to have such groups.

 

Who is to judge whether a student or an organization is racist? You are getting into thought crimes here...though racism is not a crime. But again this policy of discriminating against whites exists because no one is willing to pursue a lawsuit...who wants to be labeled a racist on campus?

 

Nowadays just not giving into everything a "special" protected group wants can be considered racist.
(As you pointed out, that people are afraid of being labeled racist, for combating Black groups)

I'm still waiting for hordes of Liberals to fight against the discrimination I've grown up with for being of Polish heritage.
(Quite the opposite, it's often times Liberals promoting dumb Polak jokes)

 

Exactly.....what allows such hypocrisy are school administrators kowtowing to political correctness and Federal Guidelines.

 

discrimination is still a crime... and many of these groups discriminate...

the only thing you've said so far that I agree with, is that nobody will challenge the racism in a court of law, because they're afraid to be labeled racists for standing up... which means the racism will be allowed to continue, illegally...

 

Female groups exist to assert their dominance indeed. And yes, even positive sexism is sexism.

 

Liberals are the modern anti-semites also. The only hope you have for getting liberal support is to be some kind of victim or as in the case of blacks to be perceived as a victim.

Liberals supported Israel until the Israelis demonstrated they were quite ready and capable to defend themselves...then the liberals decided the victims were palestinians..so now they support the palestinians and call jews and or zionists racists.

 

equal treatment doesn't mean because one person is violating the law, everyone gets to violate the law... it just means both parties have a means in a court of law to stop the violator... but it still requires someone stand up and begin that charge... if nobody stands up, it will never end... and thats our problem, which seems to be coming to a crossroad where people are finally standing up and saying this racism is no longer acceptable, and are doing something about it... how successful they will be, remains to be seen...

 

I think it's wrong for anyone to establish groups based on their racial identity.

 

Jews are pretty dang Liberal.

Just short of 80% of American Jews voted for Obama.

As much as 3/4th of Democrat campaign money also comes from Jews.

Not to mention Jews run, or founded many Liberal institutions, including Hollywood, NBC, CBS, CNN, ABC, SPLC, ADL, NAACP ACLU, and so forth.