If I was a judge I could probably not decide this case, but if I was a leader I would

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by peoplevsmedia, Apr 22, 2012.

  1. peoplevsmedia

    peoplevsmedia Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,765
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think which ever side you take about this media publicized Trayvon/Zimmerman event, both sides do not know, have no way of knowing what the truth is and therefor both sides are idiots for even attempting to be smart. I almost fell into that category by posting a thread once after reading all the details on wikipedia (at least they were not from some news media source) but then before I clicked post, I had the desency to ask myself "am I really sure of my opinion" and I was NOT sure, so I did not post it, even though I spent 30+ minutes writing it. "opinions are like asses, everyone has one, and they all stink"

    But I do know THIS:
    If I was a president, I would do something about crime in general, such as the way we would be dealing with street thugs, drug dealers, robbers and all the other filth, and therefor eliminate the need for these gated communities in the first place. and I can swear to you on my life, that would someone (god) say to me "you be the president of USA" I would decline it, and the reason I would decline is because I know their hands are tied with all the other filth known as senators and congressmen - only a dictator (a leader without opposition) could fix our nation now. and I would not object to such a leader coming to power, as long as he is a decent human being like myself, who is not a career politician or some lawyer or war monger or another servant to special interests, but a person who like me has lived in the real America, real ghetto, loves humanity, does not judge by race or religion etc. we need this leader, and I believe the scum on television are for the filth, and they would be the ones to call a leader (not to be confused with a powerless puppet, an acting principal) they would call such a leader "dictator, tyrant," etc. A leader should be in and out after 4 years, 8 tops.

    BECAUSE: a leader as I just described (say it's me) while I can not explain to you it would take too long and become too confusing, since there's always to look from another angle and argue WHATEVER I say, as a leader one could do THIS: like a garden or a painting, one person in charge can do a better job then a bunch of retards or experts improvising and jamming together trying to outdo each other, crap happens, and so is the case with the justice system of our country. we think it's the best, but in my imagination lies much better.
     
  2. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    if only a dictator could fix the situation we our now in shouldnt we be looking back in history and deturman where we went wrong? culture and population of races have changed in the past 50 years and females are now voting and have police and supreme court judge postions, thus there more easier going on crimminals because of there more librail mindset, so even if you put a tuff none sense president dictator in power he /she would be limmited on the actions you would want to be done. to fix a bad house you have to start with the foundation first, then latter the roof goes into place. think like a engineer more not like a social butterfly
     
  3. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    We (out here) don't have all available evidence; and investigations are 'ongoing'. That is the difference between what a trial will be and what we've heard in the news.
     
  4. peoplevsmedia

    peoplevsmedia Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,765
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1. I don't see why it would be limitted, can you explain more?
    2. exactly.
     
  5. Anders Hoveland

    Anders Hoveland Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This sounds eerily similar to another thread I started some time ago:
    self defense when there are no witnesses

    Problem is, one person killed another, claimed it was self-defense, but we really do not know exactly what happened.
    It really seems like an unfair situation, because on the one hand, the right to self-defense should be protected, but on the other hand it kind of seems unfair to let one of the individuals get off the hook just because he was the one that happened to survive the confrontation.
     

Share This Page