How will it be perceived by our enemies, that we are led by a woman?

ISIS cant tolerate being defeated by anyone.
The victory would be even more sweet if we took them down with a female president. (but please... not Hillary)

 

They'll think we've finally scraped the bottom of the barrel by electing a woman whose qualifications amount to marrying a previous president, and not caring if he has some action on the side.

Like Merkel, they have no respect for her either.

 

the people who create this enemy are the rich, they cause us to go to middle east for oil profits.

whats better for Americans, saying we're defeating poor ignorant foreigners who hate women because of a poor interpretation of their religion by using our own woman, or avoiding violence altogether by not allowing the rich to tell us who our enemies are?

 

so if we vote a women in as President ISIS wont like it, so anyone not voting for Clinton is pleasing ISIS?

 

There's a difference between laughter and not liking something.

 

Hillary could be a man...These days it's whatever one wants to be and I think she wants to be a man.

 

Margaret Thatcher

Golda Meir

 

Women leaders have a high record of sending young men into war.

 

, , ,

 

Is that a good thing? Is that what people want?

- - - Updated - - -

Links please

- - - Updated - - -

Touching on a social issue not even mentioned in the thread.

 

link... and our military is not just men

 

During the latter part of the 20th century there were four notables:

"Baroness" Thatcher of England sent lots of young men to die in the Malvinas 1982. She ordered the sinking of the Belgrano which was outside of the conflict zone and sailing to port with the loss of 323 almost all apprentice sailors.
http://belgranoinquiry.com/

Zionist Golda Meir of Israel rejected Egyptian approaches for peace which led to the Yom Kippur War of Oct. 6, 1973.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-kipnis-golda-meier-kissinger-20131010-story.html

Indira Gandhi of India went to war with Pakistan during the East Pakistan revolt in 1971.
http://www.history.com/topics/indira-gandhi

Sirimavo Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka was a pro-Buddhist and pro-Sinhalese policies waged war against the Tamil minority resulting in a bloody civil war. Since 1983, about 68,000 people have lost their lives.
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Sirimavo_Bandaranaike

 

I dont see why not. People always warn about trump or whoever starting ww3. If ww3 is going to start its going to be russia vs the us or us vs china. If russia and the US are allied that makes it much less likely.

Plus you dont need to spend a lot more on nato.

I really dont see any benefit in continually treating Russia as an enemy. I dont mind with a pissant country like North Korea but Russia could be useful.

 

That you refer to Muslims as cavemen confirms my belief you are a poe.

 

I don't think he's a Poe, but I do wonder if he's a sockpuppet of liberalminority.

 

George Bush was a woman! NO! That can't be, I mean, I didn't like that warmonger but I don't think Laura would've stayed with him if he was a woman....

I don't believe Lincoln was either.....could you list the women who sent young men to war?........and the male leaders you want to skip, list them , too...

 

I say some "men" in this country will have more of a problem with a woman President and I find that delightful I think the answer is : "Whine and complain that it is unfair?""

 

Are you suggesting that we choose our leaders based on how our enemies perceive them? Shouldn't we make these choices based on how we perceive them?

 

Read Post #37.