To be fair, the lefties are foaming at the mouth 24/7 regardless of what happens. It's the leftie thing to do.
Who cares what some BLM idiot says? The cops will have it under control, so no worries. The real problems will be from RWNJ gun freaks (who circle jerk to the 2nd amendment) and want to "open carry". Those right-wing gun freaks are who the cops should be worrying about.
Other than the Dallas shooter claimed to be outraged by a blm facebook post and shot cops at a blm protest... But dont let reality affect your grotesque defense of black guys slaughtering police officers. I posted that BLM figure Shabaz insisted that there will be violence and chaos at the convention. What are your thoughts on that? Oh... Right... You are a liberal... I mean what are your feelings about that?
Whoever the BLM Rep is, is an idiot. She sounds like a goof ball arguing for lebensraum. My goodness, I thought fascism was on the way out the door. BLM is a violent tribe now. I agree, we need to have civil discourse about the use of force by our police officers. But now, it seems, it's just two bands of bloodthirsty savages clashing, while the rest of us watch bewildered.
That would be the left wing idiots wanting to open carry at protest events around the convention... Its been on the news... I guess you just heard "gun" and assumed. Funny that.
grow a spine. RWers were carrying rifles to Pres Obama speeches as open carry and the yahoos were bragging about it. this is one of worst dishonest threads
Show me right wingers open carrying ar 15s to Obama speeches. As to the honesty of the thread... what do you find non-factual or misrepresented? While on the subject of intellectual honesty, am I to understand that you think it would be wrong and worthy of condemnation for people to open carry rifles to an Obama speech? Does this belief not hold the same weight with Trump? Especially from a black sepratist group which advocates violence against whites? Especially given the recent attacks on white police officers by blacks holding the same views? Or do you not actually care unless it serves your political position? I for one believe that NOBODY should open carry rifles to political events. It is an implicit threat on the democratic process of leadership. I could see a circumstance in the face of actual tyrany, not hyperbole, in which it would be acceptable, but I have and hope to not ever see such a day.
go ahead and double down on ignorance, it is on tape. any web search has it. keep continuing your false narratives
What a weak tit retort. It is clearly you who needs to grow a spine. You wont evidence your claim, you won't answer a simple question, or demonstrate that you aren't a hypocrite with a simple condemnation. This may be the most cowardly reply I have ever seen.
This entire thread is based on your false narrative. BLM was never mentioned in the article. This is the main reason why I will not contribute to this forum. Your false narratives are plain pathetic, and shameless. Case in point. RWer outrage is a joke. http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/18/obama.protest.rifle/ Video of the unidentified man toting an assault rifle outside President Obama's speech to veterans Monday was aired all over the country, causing a buzz about weapons popping up -- legally -- around recent presidential events. The protester, who refused to give his name, was interviewed by a man carrying a microphone and said, "I am almost always armed."
I was listening to the radio as I posted the op, listening to Malik Shabaz insist on violence at the RNC. I was listening to it live, and mentioned several groups... whi h the article was referencing. Are you suggesting that my claim, of the live conversation, was not genuine? I am sure I can find it now, as it is no longer live. I stated in the op that I just heard him say it. If I provide a link to that quote will you then suck (*)(*)(*)(*) through a straw? By which I mean apologize for your spurrious lies about me and defend your argument like a man? You said a right wing gun nut took an ar15 to the potus rally and bragged about it. Can you demonstrate that this black guy is a right winger, and not say a libertarian or some other sort of nut? I see your article states they dont know who he is. I await proof of your claim.
Yes, I am claiming you and your post are not genuine. I have provided concrete evidence to back up my claim.
Your claim was a right wing gun nut did such and such. You proved no such thing. I remember malik shabazz from ferguson, who blm elected to speak for them. He is a former founder of the NBP. http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...roup-nation-islam-controlling-ferguson-andrew Here is the quote I heard live. Former New Black Panther Leader Malik Shabazz: There Will Be Violence in Cleveland (Video) http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...leader-shabazz-will-violence-cleveland-video/ See, there is a crossover of these groups, nation of islam, nbp, and other black sepratist groups unified under black lives matter. That is why these things crop up at blm protest sights. You can cry to the heavens that I am conflating, but the evidence of my assertion is before you... Unlike your claim which remains unsubstantiated, and your question of scruples remains unanswered.
Conservatives have a life and work for a living. We don't have George Soros or welfare to keep us afloat.
They may be stupid, but they're not going to do anything violent, if that's their goal, until tonight or tomorrow. Why have cops on edge after two or three straight days of violence?
Blm representative malik shabazz promised violence at the rnc. I provided a link to him representing blm, and a link to his quote with video where he promised violence... Wtf are you talking about? I mean... I have carried my burden. Putting your hands over your eyes and yelling liar liar liar doesnt make my factual posts made up, no matter how shodily you write it. No sir, your claim was that a right wing gun nut showed up at an Obama rally with an ar-15. You showed some blqck (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) with an ar-15, but did NOT demonstrate that he was right wing at all. You went on to claim he bragged about it afterwards... This guy wouldnt even give his name, and sure as (*)(*)(*)(*) never bragged to media afterwards. You brought nothing. You made assumptions you cannot possibly prove... No wonder you like blm. Facts dont mean (*)(*)(*)(*) to you. You're embarrassing yourself. I dont like bullying people. You should just whither now. - - - Updated - - - This one I am unaware of. Source please.
So far it appears that the so-called violence that was supposed to occur has yet to. While the convention isn't over, if no violence of substance occurs then a few in here might just have to eat crow this time around.
I have no face to save. I was simply relaying some news that a controversial blm/nbp affiliate guaranteed violence. I hope he is wrong.
I dont want there to be violence. It is a diseased mind that would. It would not even be an I told you so moment if there were... My point had more to do with the perfect storm of violence advocating groups uniting under the banner of blm.
I'm thinking of modern American capitalism. The large corporations have the government in their pocket, and the government has the gun. Thus, the guy with the moneybag has the gun. The other guy (the middle class guy) has neither money nor gun. Did you know that the average middle class American now makes less money than the average middle-class Canadian? Welcome to capitalism.
