Right-wing extremists are a bigger threat to U.S. than ISIS

F.A.G. members do not deal in "Substance", other than what they can abuse... Good going, F.A.G. [video=youtube;5HFDFaiihaA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFDFaiihaA[/video]

 

Since 9/11 there have been 48 people killed by the "right wing", which comprises almost half the country. More people have been killed by Muslim jihadists.

Just to put your post in perspective.

 

Those dam white Republican extremists who keep rioting and burning down Baltimore, Detroit, Ferguson, DC, Wisconsin, New Orleans.

UGH! Those conservative Republicans are so dangerous, one of their homies killed 6 cops in Dallas!

Oh wait

 

Racists, racists everywhere....

Milwaukee, Baltimore, Ferguson, Dallas ..

 

The people who fought to free this nation would be labelled extremists and terrorists today. Fact.

 

AND?

Lindsey Graham, Chris Cristie, Rick Scott, Ric Perry, and Susan Collins are running around threatening armed insurrection if Clinton is elected?

Right wing extremists are armed to the teeth with their weapons and their hate. THAT makes them dangerous. FAR more dangerous than the Muslims living in this country.

BTW..I'm choosing NOT to paint all right wingers with the same brush. Any reason you couldn't do that for Muslims?

 

What a total bunch of B. S. . My god man. Get out of here.

 

Deflect some more. I like your desperation.

And yet the data I posted shows otherwise. Unless you'd like to explain how such a "dangerous" group is responsible for less deaths than Muslim extremists who are 1/50th their size in the population?

What you're doing is obvious, and it's the same thing the OP is doing. You feel "icky" that a non-white, non-Western, non-Christian minority group that votes Democrat is responsible for the majority of the terror attacks in this country, so you're trying to redirect the focus onto white, right-wing, Christian boogeymen, because that is the preferred enemy in your left-wing, politically correct paradigm.

But how ironic that somebody who just last week said it was an honor to be mentioned in the company of Bernadine Dorhn (Ohrnstein), an unrepentant domestic terrorist, is now complaining about how dangerous the right-wing is with respect to terrorism. Do you really think you're fooling anyone? What a joke.

 

Did you not get the humor in my post?

 

Poe's Law.

 

You didn't need a winky or smiley for that!

My girlfriends cat is named Poe, so that term means something else to me entirely haha!

 

In other words, you can't reference even a single instance. I knew you wouldn't be able to support your assertion. Great job of falling flat on your face.

Alluding to something is very different than stating they are going to overthrow the government as you asserted. So on top of your being unable to reference even a single instance you now attempt to move the goal posts. Your response is an utter failure at every level.

What I find particularly hysterical is that you walked right into it. Of course I knew you couldn't support your post. I just wanted to watch you make even more of a fool of yourself.

 

Couldn't resist a drop of sexism, could ya? You must be for trump.

Conspiracy theories are firmly in the realm of right wing ideologies. Fear and paranoia wrapped in faux patriotism is all they have. According to you, Law enforcement agencies are conspiracy theorists? Only in America.

 

Yes! Good argument!

From the article you likely didn't read:

Try to stay focused. Using your own source against your ridiculous argument is making it too easy. You lose.

- - - Updated - - -

I didn't make the article. If the summation of your argument is 'nuh uh' i'll leave you to wallow in your own ignorance. You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

 

If you look at the murder rate I would say black Dems a by in far the most dangerous group.

 

I didn't produce the title of the article. If you had spent the time to read it and educate yourself, you'd have known that. Again, you're making this too easy. I suggest you read, think, then post. In that order.

 

You mean like the OP?

 

It's right wing extremist groups. Not the average right wing crybaby you see on these forums. Try reading before making yourself look so silly.

- - - Updated - - -

How do you intend to prove this fact? Try staying on topic.

 

Many of these "patriots" are unemployed vets who never reintegrated after serving overseas.They play their war games in the woods and form militias and talk about armed rebellion, but they are just too demented to accomplish anything.

 

You're entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. Read the article and try educating yourself.

 

Already addressed. You are, of course, leaving out the 49 homosexuals who were killed by an Islamic extremist last month, which almost doubles the amount of jihadist deaths. And, of course, you're ignoring the fact that Muslims are 1% of the population, whereas the "right wing" is almost half of the population.

You should apologize for radical Islam better than this. It's embarrassing.

 

You're likely right. They probably never fit in in the first place. I cannot imagine their education is very good or employment is very rewarding.

 

Half the population are not right wing extremists, like the article says. Again, try to stay focused. Are you out of sources for me to bash you over the head with?

- - - Updated - - -

You're calling numerous law enforcement agencies conspiracy theorists.

 

You blamed "right-wing ideologies" in your OP. "Right wing extremists" would come from the overall right-wing, which is almost half the country. Islamic Jihadists would come from Muslims, who are about 1% of the country. The latter group has killed more than the former. All important details you leave out of your posts, of course, because it highlights the flaws in your argument, which I'm happy to point out to everyone else.

- - - Updated - - -

Remember folks, the left loves the military nowadays. They aren't spitting in their face anymore.

 

You're projecting, likely because you have nothing good to say. I didn't assert anything, hence the article you clearly didn't read.