Trump should definitely be required to divest himself of any foreign investments or possible conflicts of interest should he be elected to the presidency. Pledging to do so now is probably in his best interest. And, by the same token ............. Hillary should be required to explain her relationship with foreign royalty, foreign political figures and all the other wealthy members of secret organizations that have agendas contrary to the best interest of our country or potentially harmful to the wellbeing of the populous. Using the presidency to further such agendas would be treasonous. Hillary has been identified as an attendee of at least two Bilderberg meetings (held in strict secrecy) and husband Bill has admitted attending the Bilderberg meeting in 1991, and is suspected of attending meetings in later years. At least one members of Hillary's advisors have also attended Bilderberg meetings. Clinton's close ties to global elitist's secretive organizations like Bilderberg present a legitimate reason to disqualify her from consideration for the presidency. We should also consider Bill into the equation because he goes where Hillary goes. Bill has ties to the Freemasons through association with De Molay, where he was groomed for leadership. Masonic organizations are very secretive, like the Bilderberg Group of international elitists. Oaths of Secrecy are not conducive with our democratic system where full disclosure of private affairs is required of candidates for the presidency, to eliminate conflicts of interest. Also, Oaths of Secrecy have been known to include stipulations having them supersede any other oath the member might take. The Clintons are a dangerous couple, both prone to deceptive tactics. They are sure to lead the country into the perversion of a New World Order where human rights are sacrificed at the whim of global elitists via organizations like the UN. Dealing with Trump for 4 years is a much safer option.
While there's nothing wrong with the DeMolay and that they teach boys about leadership, it's been 50-years since Bill Clinton had any active contact with the DeMolay. Actually secrecy is a keystone of a democratic society: www.travelingtemplar.com/2013/05/secrecy-whats-big-deal.html
The problem with secret societies, like Freemasonry, and Bilderberg Group which both Clintons have ties to, is that public officials are subject to oaths of secrecy which could be considered treasonous. We go to great lengths to investigate presidential candidates for any investment or foreign connection that might lead to a conflict of interest. And once elected they command enough power to advance secret agendas which are never made public. Knowing that both Bill and Hillary Clinton attended secretive meetings where their loyalties could have been compromised, should eliminate Hillary Clinton from consideration for presidency. The country can not afford threats to its sovereignty, which Clinton poses.
Except Masonic Obligations do not interfere with a Masons other obligations and duties in life. And there's nothing treasonous about Masonic obligations, and, in fact, in the First Degree, Masons are charged to obey the laws of the land. And no, the Clintons do not have ties to Freemasonry.
Mgr4T Low level Masons are not aware of upper echelon activities or even the names of 33rd degree and above Masons. Bill Clinton, a senior DeMolay member was voted to the DeMolay Hall of Fame. In addition, he was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and participated in Bilderberg meeting in 1991. Hillary attended a Bilderberg meeting while she was Sec of State which is considered treasonous. That meeting was private and the agenda discussed was secretive. Bilderberg members and attendees included foreign heads of State, royalty, and other wealthy foreigners. Her attendance could be considered a threat to national security. That group of global elitists are huge contributors to Clintons campaign. Both Hillary and Bill participated in those secretive meetings prior to running for president. Connecting the dots is not difficult.
Says the non-Mason. And yes, we non-33° do the know the names of those who have attained the 33°: https://scottishrite.org/members/honours/2015-honourmen-33-igh/ And one's "level" is not determined by those who are 33° and those who are not. The 33° is only relevant to the Scottish Rite. And in the Scottish Rite there is no degree above the 33°. The Rites of Memphis & Misraim are spurious and nothing more than a money making scheme, and in the US are considered to be clandestine. The Rites of Memphis & Misraim belongs to the Grand College of Rites who owns all dead, defunct, and clandestine rites. Anyone who claims to be a member of the Rites of Memphis & Misraim is either lying or a fake Mason. This whole "low level" Mason argument is nothing more than a hypocritical, and illogical, argument in an attempt to silence and discredit Masons who are speaking out against such blatant lies (like those you are peddling). So freedom of assembly is now a security threat?
Some low level Masons aren't competent enough to comment on THE POINT of the thread. They usually choose to comment on part of a minor point building their phony ego with irrelevant attacks on the author.
