The Alt-Right

You too, give me a moment to reply to your cogent post. Thanksgiving hangover and issues attached that need attending.


Cheers

 

The fact remains that Hillary herself never explained her comments made to the Brazilians. Two different explanations came out one by the apology press and one by Mook. Both were different.

A country without orders is no longer a country. The EU is finding that out. Her dream of open borders is exactly that.

 

I kept my ears and eyes open and I heard Hillary Clinton herself explain this. But, damage was intentional done already when Donald Trump grasped that and made it into something entirely different. So, supporters made a conscious choice, to either believe her or him. The facts were there, they had been made perfectly clear, but people didn't like her so they dismissed the truth and grasped the fable.

 

You mean they didn't trust her bipolar public and private face.

 

If the AltRight is none of those things you mention, neither the left nor the dying old bigots have reason to feel uncomfortable.

 

When were you last in Europe?

- - - Updated - - -

Watch the video.. These kids have good hair cuts and clean clothing, but they are vile racists.

 

it's best to let their impatience fester, the let down will be more crippling and maybe then they might learn something.

 

Only a partisan would blame 1 party. LOL.

 

Maybe, but what I post is my best attempt to be accurate.

 

Gosh i hope not. If you think the illegal immigration issue is 1 party you are sadly mistaken.

 

Doesn't Obama brag he set records for booting out illegals?

 

Is there anything wrong with white nationalism as opposed to Jewish, Hispanic and black nationalism?

Why not tar and feather BLM if you want to criticize white nationalism and still be taken seriously?

 

Can you name successful brown countries?

 

How would you factually argue against white nationalism?

 

not sure what you mean, do you mean kicking out non-whites? if so I would say we are a diverse nation, get used to it,, I say that to both blacks and whites

though I would say groups should be able to set up communities like the Amish have if they want I suppose, they just have to be like the Amish and not ask for hand outs and mind their own business, never be heard form again

.

 

Why would a white majority country want black immigrants, and wouldn't, by any objective standard, black emigration benefit the US/white majority?

 

well we started out wanting black slaves.... that is how it started

no one at the time knew that equal rights for all would be the result of that horrible time period

.

 

Slaves were global industry at the time. Even after England banned slavery they still were associated with the slave trade as slaves were traded for goods and goods traded for other goods that ended up in England. Of course of the time it was an economic issue and a belief system that Europeans were superior because of their accomplishments.

Yes, it was a dark period in our history that we have learned from yet slavery is still ongoing in many forms. For instance ISIS takes slaves.

 

but doesn't change the fact, that is why we wanted black people here... and yes that is what I am saying, we are better for it, we now support equal rights for all

heck, if not for slavery not sure women would even have the right to vote today

ISIS is still stuck in biblical times thinking....

.

 

I'm not sure you understand how sidestepping my question is giving the impression that my question cannot be positively answered by your side and therefore you are bolstering my point that black diversity is harmful to white majority nations.

 

I am not sidestepping your questions, you can't be a white\black nationalist in a country as devise as ours... they are gonna have to learn to live in such a country

equal rights for all is a good outcome, it doesn't bolster your point that black diversity is harmful to white majority nations

.

 

How would you positively quantify female emancipation? Either way, your claim seems ridiculous since there's no connection between blacks and female emancipation, and numerous nations without slavery and/or blacks reformed the right to vote for females.

But again, this is predicated on the assumption that female voting is demonstrably good for society.

 

female voting is good for society, all adults should get a vote... equally

 

Should whites just live with pollution or bad roads?

If black diversity is demonstrably a net negative for whites, and is due to black genetics and incorrigible culture, then why should whites have to deal with an issue which could be argued as being worse to whites than any other?

- - - Updated - - -

That's a circular argument. Even if emancipation were good, and I'm not enjoying your assumption that it simply is, the connection between black diversity and emancipation is tenuous.

 

Even for Leftist promises, it didn't last long at all.