Megyn Kelly Is Said to Be Leaving Fox News for NBC

What a fantastic piece of garbage. Find any quote from MSNBC where they admit they are liberal as a network.

And Fox news repeatedly says they give the right POV a fair chance unlike MSNBC.

 

I used to like Megyn and was excited for her when she got her evening time slot. My girl crush didn't last long and it had nothing to do with her political leanings or her fight with the Trumpster. I began disliking her when she allowed herself to become a celebrity. She talks so fast that sometimes she is difficult to follow and her dress is inappropriate for someone who wants to be taken seriously in a news type position. She would fit in on The View better.

For her replacement, I am currently loving Tucker Carlson's new show and think Kimberley Guilfoyle might be able to draw in viewers. She is nice to look at, smart and funny. I like Harris Faulkner but not to carry her own show. She does great where she is at. I also like Jeanine Pirro but that voice of hers is like nails on a chalkboard.

 

I don't think it's apples to apples because she's going to a daytime show vs the prime time slot that followed O'Reilly, who, regardless of your opinion of him, gets a big audience that carried over automatically from his show to Kelly.

I seriously doubt her having a loyal enough audience in any significant number that would make a dent in going to NBC personally.

My wife liked to tune in to see how inappropriate and unprofessional her dress was for a minute here and there but that's it.

She won't be missed by me.

 

Why shouldn't she earn as much as some guy who plays with a ball for a living?

 

Wow. You sure are an angry person who loves insulting people who you've never met with insults that toddlers would make.

Have a better day, your lack of maturity shows you're not having a good one thus far.

 

The New York Times has never pretended that it is not a liberal paper, contrary to your false claims.

Fox, on the other hand, falsely claims to be "Fair and Balanced".

- - - Updated - - -

My points stand uncontested.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, you've been challenged twice now to back up your false claims.

You respond with emoticons. I guess you think that makes you look smart.

 

I've been told when someone decides to put it in your backside, they make you "lean forward". I"m not sure the phrase should be considered a validation of MSNBC's credibility.

Maybe MSNBC should change their theme music to the soundtrack from Deliverance. Looks like the phrase "leading from behind" might have a secrete meaning.

 

I was simply wishing you a better day. That statement from me still stands

 

Well you can all think what you want, but if Megyn wants a date with me, I won't turn her down any more.

 

So you want your reporters to be 100% biased to your ideology. Never mind the other side or truth. As long as it meets your biased needs, all is good.
It's why partisans are the most uninformed. They only want to hear what they want to hear.

 

Even Trump thought Hillary was going to win. Invalid point.

 

Right. And you're not.

At least some of us admit it.

 

Good riddance. I can't stand that arrogant (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)

 

I like Ms. Regan also (from the Fox Business Channel).

I've watched her many times, and she has stated often that she is an Independent voter, but she definitely leans far right.

 

Michael Moore did, as just one example. Heck, you even had Trump remarking to Pence after a rally "This doesn't feel like second place."

Yeah, about that ...

That was easy enough.

Ah, the old "Look over there! He does it too!" defense. That doesn't work when the tots in my classroom try it either.

 

She was tired of hiding from the naked old farts running around grabbing ******* at the office. Good for her.

 

Apparently NBC feels differently since they signed her to a multi-year contract. You know they had to do some research and feel comfortable with the results in order to hire her. Granted O'Reilly is very successful at what he does, although I don't watch him as a rule due to what I perceive is his sarcasm and body language on camera which I find unprofessional, however most America feels different then I do, hence his popular ratings (ratings = money, money = ratings) and yes I agree that many viewers carried over to his show to her show as well.

If NBC is smart, they'll schedule her in key day parts to get the biggest bang for the buck. Either way we'll see what transpires in 6 months.

 

I wonder how long it will take Fox to find another talking head with big hooters?

 

Too late to edit my previous post, so I'll say this: The point and the poster was responding to was saying that people live in a bubble, and specifically told straight ahead that he was one of them. The problem is that no one posting on this forum CAN live in a bubble. But the people on NBC, in the media and in the entertainment field in general do. It's actually irrelevant to the argument (and a case of goalpost moving) whether Trump thought Hilla was going to win or not, the point being argued was entirely different.

 

Back in 1956 the N.Y. Times did endorse Dwight D. Eisenhower. How times have changed.

 

She didn't have a set so that's a low bar to clear.

 

Well, that remains speculative as no figures have yet been made public, but I'll be interested to see where my license fee is going. Figures are promised later this year, according to my link.
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016...-and-how-could-they-affect-licence-fee-payers

 

I think she'll be a hell of an act to follow - good looking, smart as hell, sense of humour, and a good speaking voice to boot. Makes the other female Fox anchors look like cardboard cutouts.

 

No I dont want any bias that is my point

 

Then not sure why you watch/listen to faux in the 1st place. There is no objectiveness on the station. They are a version of MSNBC. Everyone knows it.
Or they should've tried to keep her so you get a different take than full blow BS of Hannity.