Why are minorities immune to criticism while whites are not?

Well let's just have a look at Singapore, shall we?

https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=1503

The Singaporean government has taken steps to curb illegal immigration from Indonesia and elsewhere. Police carried out a series of highly publicized crackdowns throughout March, netting hundreds of illegal immigrants from various countries who had either been smuggled in or had overstayed their work visas. Indonesians do not need visas to enter Singapore.

On March 4, for example, a sweep drove Bangladeshis, Indians and Pakistanis out of there cardboard box homes in Farrer Park. Most had lost construction jobs and were looking for other employment. On March 16, the Singaporean Home Affairs Minister announced that nationals of Myanmar and Bangladesh entering Singapore will be required to post bonds of $3,000 to $5,000 to discourage them from overstaying their tourist visas.

Illegal immigrants face penalties of up to six months in prison and three strokes of a rattan cane. Employers who hire illegal immigrants face two years in jail, fines of up to S$6,000 ($US1=S$1.6) and possible caning. In March 1998, judges reportedly increased the standard penalty on illegal immigrants to between four and six weeks imprisonment and between four and six strokes of the cane. The maximum penalty for entering Singapore illegally is six months jail and 12 strokes of the cane.

How many lashes do we give illegal immigrants?

How many years do we put those who hire illegal immigrants in jail?

Less than or equal to singapore?

You don't have a leg to stand on here.

There are no non-white majority countries that treat illegal immigrants as well, have less restrictive immigration laws, and have adopted the "multicultural" mantra as the United States.

Every other country in the world is largely mono-racial and only white majority countries are expected to adopt the "multi-cultural" ********.

Majority white countries are the only ones to have completely stamped out slavery worldwide.

Majority white countries have the lowest cases of human rights abuses worldwide.

So when other countries tell us the US is "racist" or "isn't doing enough", it's nothing but a farcical comment.

 

Not bad, for 1998. However the country has eased up on some of its strictness since that time.

http://www.migrationpolicy.org/arti...immigrant-population-brings-policy-challenges

- - - Updated - - -

If white people were really that hated they'd be dead already.

 

The left wing is the new bigoted party. They just think they are not.

 

But at least they finished high school! Not like the quarter of the Black and Hispanic populations that didn't bother! Who cares if there are financial reasons? Poor schmore, I say! Social capital defict? Rubbish! They should show some initiative: give shoe shines, sell matches at street corners, do a lemonade stand, flog a kidney. Always ways to make money in the Land of Opportunity!

 

No, it hasn't.

From your own link.

You'll notice "illegal immigrant" isn't an option in Singapore.

This is from last year

https://ica.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=13410

 

Also from my link:

 

I agree social liberals with their identity politics are a stripe of bigot, but they are not of the left. They are members of the professional/knowledge class, well heeled, cashed up and privileged. They are quite happy with the economic status quo because they are doing very nicely out of it, thank you very much. Like the plutocracy's own pin up girl, Hillary Clinton. There is nothing leftist about Hillary Clinton. Liberal does not mean left. That's why she can preach women's rights and Wall Street's rights in the same breath. And it's why the left stayed home in their millions on 8th November, 2016.

The supreme irony is I think the modern Democrats actually believe they are on the left. I don’t think they just say if for effect, they really think it's true. We've got 'em over here, too, guys. You're not suffering a pseudo-left and missing real one alone.

 

Neither Obama or Hillary were actual Liberals, I agree. Obama totally fooled actual liberals. Mainly because they voted for him because they wanted the first black President. Hillary bragged about helping Libyans carry out an assassination of a national leader. Opposite of the left

 

That's it exactly. The oblivion is the really scary thing, though.

 

They bend over backwards for the highly skilled and educated.

There's a revelation.

Don't think I don't notice you trying as hard as possible to distance yourself from the original argument, which you still haven't addressed.

 

Post of the week.

The very sad and deeply worrying thing is that these privileged wankers have effectively hijacked the left. The working classes no longer mean anything, nor have any voice in the politic of Democrats/Labor. It's now the party of virtue signalling narcissists who know nothing of life in the dirt.

 

Well, not all of the white majority countries have stamped out slavery yet. One still allows it. It’s in their constitution:

"Penal labor in the United States, when intended as a form of slavery or involuntary servitude, is explicitly allowed by the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This form of legal slavery is only allowed when used as punishment for committing a crime. The 13th Amendment states that "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_labor_in_the_United_States

 

hahahahaha, yea and who possesses that capability you think? lol

But reality prooves your post wrong. We are that hated, but we still standing.

 

So because US whites are better killers they need to have less rigid immigration laws? What exactly are you trying to say?

 

Yeah?

Maybe we could start allowing our felons (you know, murderers, rapists, etc) to choose to go to a prison in a foreign country because we have a penal slavery system.

What country do you think they'll choose, and will they have wifi and pay per view?

Or maybe they could stop raping and murdering. There's a thought.

 

Well, I'm gonna have to tread carefully here. The reason for most of the problems with these communities is because of a lot of reasons; In Chicago, for example. The bad neighborhoods there are bad because of economic issues. The single mothers need the little money they have to support their children, so they can't move out and live in a better place. The children grow up, and aren't able to find jobs because of their lack of education, o they need to resort to crime. Then, one of the children, a male, will fall in love, and go out with a girl. They'll eventually have sex unprotected, because many of them lack sex education due to their bad economic situation, which will result in the girl getting pregnant, and, because she needs the male to help her live through the crime, desperately begs for him to stay. The male, not knowing what to do, tries to get out the situation, leaving the woman to become a single mother. Few are able to escape this cycle, because it is so rare for an opportunity to present itself. That's why some minorities don't leave as easily as their white counterparts.

 

I'm sorry, but this current post of yours has no relevance to the post you'd written and I answered. Its an emotive rant that has nothing to do with the conversation we were having.

The post you'd written asserted- with a graphic of Africa you'd borrowed from the Huffington Post- that white majority countries had stamped out slavery and that no white majority country now has slavery. I gave you evidence that you were incorrect, the USA still has legal slavery and it is enshrined in the US Constitution.

The only thing I could glean from your last post is you believe rapists and murderers live in the lap of luxury with wifi and pay per view. It tells me a bit about you, but sadly it tells me nothing about slavery, and slavery was the topic you and I were discussing.

 

So you don't vote? Or you vote third party maybe? Who did you vote for in the last 3 elections? Do you vote for Democrats or Republicans for Senate/House races, etc.?

 

That's because your cognitive dissonance is ridiculous and doesn't allow you to grasp the difference between a person being punished for a crime (i.e a felon), and a slave who has performed no crime, nor does it allow you to see one is incarcerated and one is owned.

That you would compare an actual slave to a prisoner given all due legal rights and options via the due process clause is, quite frankly, disgusting.

What you are efffectively doing is minimizing actual slavery, and I find that appalling.

Sometimes when I find someones comments both ludicrous, and disgusting, I apply humor to ease the blow.

Since you replied the way you did, I'll just tell you what I think since you refuse to take the hint.

 

And to Leftists, they'd be calling Jesus a Nazi if he dared to ask for forgiveness for Trump. Actually it is you that doesn't know anything about Christianity. Many people chosen by god in the bible to "spread his message" or otherwise represent him were horrible people by many standards. People who've done things far worse than Trump. Even worse than the Clintons, if you can imagine that. Redemption is a key concept in Christianity, as is forgiveness of what they consider sins. "Judge not lest ye be judged" is another mantra. Also the understanding the few Christians can live a life fully in line with the highest morality espoused by Christ.

 

People don't have unprotected sex because they lack sex education. Half the world gets ZERO sex education, and yet that half has lower rates of teen pregnancies etc. Are we in the west so utterly moronic that we haven't figured this out? Sometimes it seems a wonder that we can put one foot in front of the other without falling down. Sex education does absolutely nothing .. apart from encourage the wrong kids to start early. Poor decisions about sex are entirely a result of culture and upbringing.

Two kids in the same school, and living in the same area. Both families on similar incomes. One has Chinese parents who are hardworking and clean living, the other an intellectually neglected child (any race) from a family of dysfunctional lazy people. Both get the same 'sex education'. One studies hard with 100% support from parents, becomes a highly paid professional, marries in her late 20s, has two kids, and stays married. The other has her first baby at 16, the second (by a different father) at 18, and is single by 21.

 

You're good at commenting with irrational nonsense and irrelevant points. White people are hated, but they're not dead because they're technologically superior to every other race on the planet, and technological superiority is what wins wars. And that's why no one wants an all out war with the white race. People who feel hate, also feel fear.

 

Okay, then. Lust and the need to have sex are valid reasons. But I don't think that you got the point; the lifestyle isn't much of a choice. It is hard for these people to live in these situations. My mother lived on the south side of Chicago, and was barely able to get out of there. But she was a little better off than a few other kids in her neighborhood, from what I know.

 

And yet...

...you replied again. You're triggered. I get it. Take a tranquilizer and turn off the tv and computer. Hiterly lost. It's over. Might need to keep yourself medicated for a while.

 

All I know is what Teddy & the Democrats promised people in order to get the bill passed. When things changed, they should have admitted their mistake and changed the law back, but instead they doubled down and laid down while millions more illegal aliens invaded this country.

You really like to try and deflect when you get cornered. But it's not Europe per se as a whole. It's each country being told they must accept refugees, migrants, etc. So your point is again, irrelevant and invalid.