MIT Professor Disputes Evidence of Sarin Attack

personal attack, not founded on an argument.

 

You admitted you were not qualified to determine if any evidence that was presented was legitimate. Second, how do you know what evidence was or was not acquired by the various intelligence services?

Unlike people like you, I do not need to have evidence placed in my lap to believe it exists. Do you claim WW2 never happened since you never saw it live?

My opinion, unlike yours, is based upon people who are qualified and paid to make such investigations, unlike one-off professors sitting on a college campus 8K miles away from the event.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ied-out-sarin-attack-says-french-intelligence

Assad forces carried out sarin attack, says French intelligence
French foreign minister says method of 4 April chemical attack bore ‘signature of the regime’ and points to Syrian responsibility

 

You want to go that route, I'll be happy to report your repetitive trolling posts...No evidence....squawk.....No evidence....squawk.....No evidence....squawk.....No evidence....squawk.....

 

delete

 

The US invaded Iraq. And ISIS was born in Iraq because of the complete anarchy the US created on purpose.

 

No excuses. The US still supported these maniacs.

 

I believed it was a false flag when it happened. Nothing to gain from such a move by Assad. It would only worsen his position. The first country to retaliate was probably the one that orchestrated the gassing. The brainwashed masses soak up propaganda like a sponge. Morons!

 

The US also invaded grenada, and the UK invaded the US, does that mean that grenada can invade the UK? You're the best logician in the forum.

 

Not when he thinks he is invulnerable.

Seriously, the people who suck up every utterance from little putie boy's every proclamation and propaganda tidbit are indeed.

 

Lol. Well that argument is a rather dumb one since this aint "exactly" unskilled labor.

Evidence has been presented that it happened, hence I believe it did.
And in this case... there is no evidence being presented. I haven't seen any.
The professor hasn't seen any. Heck, even the OPCW can not say that the Syrian government did it.

You read it?
Page 3: According to France, only the Syrian armed forces had helicopters and could therefore be responsible for dropping these three objects.
page 5: While it has been confirmed that mustard gas attacks have been carried out by Daesh in Syria since 2015, France assesses that the theory of an attack by the arm ed groups using a neurotoxic agent on 4 April is not credible. France has no information confirming the possession of sarin by these groups.


Yes, genius work. They judge the Syrians could have done it, so that is the same as they must have done it. And they know the other side has WMD weapons, and know how to use it. But since they can not confirm they have this type of WMD, means they most certainly do not have it.

This is that famous solid evidence...

 

Open up an other thread about this subhect, and I might contribute.

 

Did you believe GWB with his alternative reality about Iraq at the time? Would be obvious. I think most Americans swallowed that propaganda.

 

No thanks. I stopped reading your posts, and can see that no one else responds to your posts either. Bye now.

 

I've noticed that the pro-russian cabal has stopped trying to pretend that assad didn't perform the sarin attack now that the French have confirmed that the syrian regime is responsible. Not very surprising.

No doubt they and other trolls will be quickly on to some other subject to propagandize with.

 

Your post is an excellent demonstration of a person who has bought into the conspiracy theory concocted by the US government. Not a shred of evidence to support the claim, but you buy into it, lock, stock and barrel.