Political TKO? Reporter charges Greg Gianforte ‘just body slammed me and broke my glasses’

If I hide behind it, I would not openly claim it right? But please, respond to the link I gave. I'm honestly curious to your answers. And again, do you honestly think because I would oppose Trump mindlessly because I live overseas? You have a strange way of reasoning.

It's very simple. You don't resort to violence as people's representative. You call the cops to take him away, unless he attacks you. He didn't.

 

Just a lame attempt at slight of hand

 

Screed noted for its repetitiveness. You've a leftist. I've never called you a Democrat. Over and over again, you liberals demonstrate the same traits: projection and assumption. I called him a manipulative worm because I concluded as much after observing his body language, inflections and facial tics when characterizing what happened.

If you do not possess such ability, do not impugn mine.

 

You really have no clue, do you.

First you say this was popular at Trump rallies and that Trump encouraged it (he made ONE comment that he'd pay the bill) even though every one of his rallies were interrupted by loud anti-Trumpers that constantly got violent and started trouble, and then you claim his support base are mostly Kardashian and Paris Hilton fans. Do you even pay attention to politics? Because I'm fully convinced, at this point, that you don't.

 

" (without the parenthesis) between my post, and your response.

Then hit 'save changes'.[/QUOTE]

Thank you for the tip, it changed a bit but not enough.....

 

Greg must have thought the reporter was a Nazi, and from a lot of the left, its "ok to punch Nazis".

 

I'll look back at your link; I didn't see it. You repeatedly claimed I called you a Democrat. I didn't. I called you a liberal, and you are.

Nothing I said challenges this statement. You are, again, projecting assumptions into my statements, instead of reading them at face value.

Which is one of now several reasons why I KNOW you're a liberal.

 

You get what you give. How unfortunate.

 

The word you're looking for is 'sleight'.

And it was so lame, apparently, that you have no refutation. What I said is true. Live with the fact that you incorrectly presumed my position, instead of actually reading about it.

 

what is this then?:

"Oh look. Another 'non-democrat'. Real ones must be as rare as hen's teeth. Tell me, Jun, what will I find when I search your posts for your declarations on Trump? Will I find this "poor form" you're clucking about?"

If you want to stick to generalisation and observations of characterization which isn't influenced by bias, by all means.

 

I'll post it again then.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/outside-observations-on-american-discussions.505639/


Apart from that, more generalisation. not worth to respond to.

 

That's not calling you a Democrat. That's me pointing out how you run from a classification of political ideology merely because you're NOT a Democrat.

You're a liberal. Do you think there's any difference in how I respond to you?

Generalizations? Where? I reference liberals insofar as the traits they shared, and I named them. Projection and assumption.

Which you've been guilty of in this thread.

 

Body slammed him? Was he wearing spandex at the time?

 

I wonder how many people can read that quote and not see any implications of you calling me a democrat. I'd say it has a stronger indication than your read on the reporter. It's mostly about you saying something first and then retracting it why I brought it up.

Yes, all liberals are the same. All across the world.

I haven't made a generalisation at all here. The closest thing I said, is that all representatives should be above violence. I don't think I ever said something about anyone else? If so, find me a quote.

 

Like I said, you get what you give. Funny how you liberals are crying now. You're all famous for it. The DNC cheats their own candidate in and gets exposed by Wikileaks and, silent about that, you people point your fingers at Trump and accuse him of cheating. This is why you people aren't winning. Yes, the Trump Era, get used to it. Let me know when you see anything this below from a Trump supporter.

Were you crying and condemning this:

 

Where were you for the last 10 years? Oh yeah, drinking the Kool-Aid that caused this. Now you're part of it and are so blind to the fact that you're actually pointing and blaming the side you've been taught to hate. That's all the Kool-Aid is good for. Try thinking independently, it's a whole new world.

 

"O poo! If I had shot the dude, the NRA would have delivered me a landslide!"​

 

Pretending is still just pretending

 

You're trying to defend Russian interference interesting

 

Dude, the audio of this was like 20 seconds, if not less. A 25 year old man in his prime couldn't even pull off grabbing a neck, throwing a person to the ground, and then repeatedly punching him. And that includes the words leading up to his fantasy MMA fight. But I see logic and reason has no place here, as you think a 50+ year old man is capable of that. HUGE LULZ on that one!

 

I wouldn't admit to being a democrat either. Pretty embarrassing thing to be these days.

Do you condemn them for calling Trump orange because of the way he looks or do you just limit your anger to Republicans when they say something about a democrat? You know, the same group of people you defend no matter what, but are not affiliated with.

 

You are justifying assault, end of story.

Someone else said "antagonize" not me. Focus more.

 

I don't think it's relevant. There's plenty of stuff to oppose Trump on. But his looks or his wife slapping his hand? No point. But why do you think I should answer for anyone calling himself a liberal? I don't expect you to answer for anything dumb conservatives do either. Unless you defend it.

 

Wake up, it's not 2008 anymore. The thugs have all been fired.

 

Division among politics and race. But they've drank so much Kool-Aid that they, with a straight face, point their finger at Trump and blame him for it. Other than that, nothing.