All The Doctors Testified They Saw An Exit Wound On The President

Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, May 24, 2017.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No they never have.

    Every attempt anyone has made to do so has failed massively
     
  2. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    nice to see you so graciously retracting you assertion that penetrating neck wounds can't enter the skull.

    so the neck wound, which by your post was casually observed, and through which a trach was placed, didn't really exist?
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It did exist it was an exit wound
     
  4. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what were the comments at autopsy about this wound ? Please quote specifically
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
  6. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    odd, the experts did no dissection and didn't comment on injuries to any structures within neck.
    No mention of tracheal injury, No mention of vertebral or cord injury. No mention of carotid or jugular injury.
    That's some damn good forensics right there.
     
  7. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Neither did the doctors at Bethesda.

    It was not their job to make such examinations and therefore their claims are irrelevant
     
  8. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Geniuses Hume and Boswell found no gaping exit wounds in the back of Kennedy's skull. What a couple of foul ups (though their generals, many of whom were in attendance at the autopsy, loved the conclusion this led to and undoubtedly approved of the screw ball work they did).

    And since Kennedy's skull was altered and patched up after his body had been illegally stolen from Parkland Hospital, perhaps I shouldn't be so harsh on them (even though any half way competent forensic pathologist would have discovered this right away).
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2017
  9. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is zero evidence of such alteration or patching up to the skull. There would not even be a reason to make such alterations if there WERE a conspiracy which there is no evidence of in the first place.

    The very claim is absurd.

    OF course they found no exit wound in the back of the skull as they found out through careful examination that the bullet to the skull entered from above and behind.
     
  10. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How do you lie to the public about the nature of John F. Kennedy's head wounds? You ignore all the eminently qualified doctors at Parkland hospital in Dallas and you give a forum to liars in front of the Warren Commission so they can willfully misrepresent the facts.
    http://grandsubversion.com/jfkAssassination/atpyspg3.htm
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except there is no evidence of such a lie.

    The doctors at Parkland were expert emergency room doctors and not qualified pathologists. They were not eminently qualified to determine causes of death and the details of wounds.

    You have no evidence of lies
     
  12. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So only a "qualified pathologist" can tell a fist seized wound from one the size of a thumbnail?
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No the size of the wound is not relevant.

    What is relevant is whether it is an exit or entrance wound and that is what the autopsy determined not the casual observations of emergency room doctors.

    This FACT has been pointed out endlessly and you ignore it.
     
  14. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The docs performing a crappy post mordem have no bearing on the trauma docs observations
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct it was a professional post mortem done by experts and established facts which the ER observations do not challenge.
     
  16. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, so good they didn't do a neck dissection to find out if vital structures were damaged. Your bar of expertise is pretty low
     
  17. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    I think it's universally accepted that the autopsy was botched; to put it mildly.
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only by conspiracy loons
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yours is no better and being no authority on autopsies their performance trumps your amateur criticism
     
  20. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so what vital structures in the neck were damaged ?
     
  21. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Well, what I meant to state was the description of the wounds and the autopsy was botched in a great many ways. Just a quick question; would you want this sort of confusion surrounding the death of someone close to you?

    Just for openers...

    Here is an excerpt from the Warren Commission report.... The first sentence notes the head wound and a wound in the neck. This was done by the doctors in Maryland.

    upload_2017-5-30_19-39-57.png


    Yet here are the drawings of the wounds from Dallas.

    [​IMG]

    No wound in the neck.

    What happened? I think they just got it wrong and put a dot in the wrong spot. Even says "verified" on the left by the personal physician to JFK--George Berkley.

    A sinister clue to the crime of the century? No. Just a mistake.

    In the confusion and yes...PANIC of that day, expecting 100% accuracy and no errors is foolish.

    Claiming that no errors were made is equally so.
     
    resisting arrest likes this.
  22. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is possibly the most bizarrely ridiculous statement you have ever made
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,908
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it is quite accurate
     
  24. resisting arrest

    resisting arrest Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,942
    Likes Received:
    505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reading your post reminds me that First Lady Jackie Kennedy is shown by the Zapruder film reaching back--- not to aid a secret serviceman who is trying to come to the rescue--- but to grab a piece of the President's scalp which had been shot to the rear. She said this herself!
     
  25. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which I find kind of weird. But I guess under the circumstances her actions were not going to be logical.
     

Share This Page