Once the domino affect started, there wasn't anything that was going to stop it. And how can you see through all the debris/dust that there wasn't a slight hesitation between each floor pancaking on to the next????
Because what applies to WTC 1 and 2 also applies to WTC 7. It's all the same. Heat expands girders/beams/columns which causes a catastrophic failure of the whole system.
I have stated no conspiracy theory. You have and the burden of proof is on you to prove it and you cannot specify any issue because there are not any now pony up with some evidence or leave BOY
The official story is a conspiracy theory champ. Look up the meaning of conspiracy. If you know so much, why haven't you cited the information that explains the eyewitness first hand witness testimony regarding explosions and the molten metal present at the murder scene for days after. Where is this addressed in the 9/11 commission report or the NIST report? Please cite the sections and pagesbwhere these issues are addressed. The burden of proof is on you champ. Now put up or shut up. Also, where are the black boxes?
No it is not and you are uneducated and wrong. Listen carefully boy there are conspiracy and conspiracy THEORY two different things. There was a conspiracy of 19 hijackers who successfully took over aircraft and crashed them into targets. THAT IS NOT A THEORY. It fact proven by massive evidence. The conspiracy theory is the complete bullshit spouted by conspiracy theory fools LIKE YOU. None of these theories have a speck of evidence. The witness testimony of explosions is IRRELEVANT and I and many others have repeatedly addressed it. The lie you just stated about molten metal has been addressed and proven a lie. The burden of proof is on you and other conspiracy theorists. The burden of proof is on you and other conspiracy theorists. Now cite some evidence or it is an outright admission of your foolish proven lies. The next post you put in here without citing some evidence is a lie and an admission of lie so go ahead boy get pwned again
I see, no expaination for the dozens of people there who reported explosions both before and after the plane strikes, nothing in the report explaining the eyewitness accounts of molten metal days after the incident and no explaination regarding the missing black boxes. Total fail on your part as usual. You are a third rate troll and anyone who has read any of the crap you write here is fully aware of that fact. I have also always wondered why there was no footage of ANY passengers or crew boarding the planes that day included in any official report. It seems that all of the security cameras in all of the boarding areas of the airports in question (all high security airports) just happens to malfunction that day. BTW: The witnesses who experienced explosions both before and after the plane strikes and all of those eye witnesses who reported molton metal are "irrelevant"....rofl...That''s Rich champ...
Yes you do and it has been provided. There are always conflicting witnesses. The more witnesses the more varying and different accounts you will hear so it means...nothing. There are always explosions when large buildings burn and collapse so again they mean nothing. The molten metal and black boxes need no explanations. Black boxes are not indestructible and the molten metal was found many many days later at the bottom of the rubble which is to be expected. You are the troll not me you have read all of the above in the past and they are factual statements and you simply lie like a coward and pretend it was never addressed. the burden of proof is on you and that is fact. You have now also admitted that you are lying. You are pwned cooked and eaten
Here is a little hint skippy, eyewitness testimony IS evidence. There are people on death row right now as a result of eyewitness testimony. The fact that your rigged commission simply ignored evidence that was not convenient for them to address does not make that evidenc irrelavent as you foolishly say. What it does indicate is that your bull **** commission was a joke. Thanks for playing.
Wrong. Eyewitness testimony is the weakest of evidence and every death row inmate is there because hard physical evidence puts him there not JUST a witness., You have no evidence that the commission was rigged. They examined real evidence and relevant eyewitness testimony. Which is necessary when the witnesses run into the millions and they cannot all be 100% accurate Your witnesses are irrelevant and you are the fool for demanding otherwise you are wrong and proven so and you have no evidence for your proven bullshit theories.' Your are pretending at being informed and smart and educated but you are truly none of those things. Facts little boy facts you have none the report DOES. Thanks for admitting you lied and are defeated run along now
You have been completely pwned again Nazi boy. Why do you suppose that the commission did not produce ANY footage of ANY passengers or ANY crew members boarding ANY of the planes in question. Keep in mind that this was the largest mass murder in US history......I guess all f the cameras inside the terminals were on the blink that day....Pwned again...Now run along.
They did not need to produce such images they have been available to the public since before the commission was convened. Nope the only one pwned here is you every claim you have made has been CRUSHED
Another flat out lie from Nazi boy. No such photos or tapes have ever been produced. Thank you for your xposing yourself as a thirdvrate troll once again. Now I am going to enjoy the Golden State Warriors as they destroy Cleveland. Cheers
Here is proof you are the one lying. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/09/07/article-0-0DC29B3000000578-951_468x286.jpg https://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/atta-and-al-omari-in-portland-big.jpeg?w=240 They have been produced and have been available to the public for years you are pwned and crushed AGAIN. You can only lie about them but it is in your face
I'm still waiting for a response from the posers how sagging trusses can pull in the exoskeleton, and look at that 30 posts and the all hide under the carpet, no surprise there.
I never asked you to do any "work" for me and you haven't done anything of any significance that means anything to me. All you seem to be doing is trying to defend the official lies and questioning none of it. Sorry but I'm not interested. It's not my job to prove anything, that would be the job of those who were tasked/mandated to conduct the investigation. I don't play the reverse burden of proof game, that's for those who are ignorant or silly enough to believe it's someone's job to do. It's irrelevant whether I'm able to or not, see above. As far as I'm concerned, I put quite a bit of evidence together that proves beyond the shadow of any doubt that there were no legitimate official investigations into 9/11, I provided the links to the overwhelming evidence for you. Review it or don't, it's your prerogative. Talk about ignorance, by not reviewing it, that would describe the state you want to be in. That could be said about a planned controlled demolition. Once initiated, nothing is going to stop it. Is that what you're referring to? Because the other theory you want to peddle is the pancake collapse theory. One even NIST walked away from because they knew it was an absurd theory to try to peddle. So best for them to just admit they didn't bother to investigate the "collapse" of the twin towers at all, despite their mandate. It has been measured to my satisfaction by experts quite adequately. But even if no expert measured the lack of any hesitation, the videos and many other supporting facts speak for themselves. Here is an example: Are you talking about controlled demolitions? If yes, then I agree (depending on what "applies"). If not then I'm not getting what you believe applies to all 3 buildings. Certainly not a pancake collapse, that would make no sense whatsoever. Well no, even the controlled demolition of the 3 buildings weren't of the same type. I'm not saying the 3 buildings were controlled demolished but there isn't a second possibility that has been proven by any legitimate scientific body. Even if that's true (and there is no evidence it is), it still doesn't explain the unimpeded accelerating destruction of the 3 buildings. There is only one known way a building can be totally destroyed similar to a controlled demolition, it's called a controlled demolition. When a controlled demolition fails, it does not resemble the total destruction of the 3 buildings on 9/11.
Is this the discussion? http://www.consensus911.org/point-video-1/ Or this? http://www.consensus911.org/point-video-2/
Once again you are proven to be a lying sack of crap. This is a video of the s This is a tape which is not time stamped from the security checkpoint, not the boarding area. People can go through security with a ticket to anywhere and never board the plane or switch tickets and go anywhere. If you read my post it said that there are no tapes of the alleged hijackers or anyone else BOARDING any of the planes. So once again, you are lying. Thanks for proving that you are a fraudulant third rate troll once again.
Once again you are proven to be a lying sack of crap. This is a video of the s This is a tape which is not time stamped from the security checkpoint, not the boarding area. People can go through security with a ticket to anywhere and never board the plane or switch tickets and go anywhere. If you read my post it said that there are no tapes of the alleged hijackers or anyone else BOARDING any of the planes. So once again, you are lying. Thanks for proving that you are a third rate troll and a fraud. Cheers
You have produced a film that was made public right after the murders on 9/11. It does not prove anything. It is not dated or time stamped. There is no proof it is even from Dulles. My point was that there are no tapes of ANY of the alleged hijackers or ANY of the crew members or ANY of the other passengers boarding ANY of the planes that allegedly hit the buildings on 9/11. A real investigation would have looked at the footage from inside all of the terminals and boarding areas to see if the alleged hijackers consorted with other conspirators before getting on the planes.
So since there are likely no tapes of anyone getting on a plane anywhere in the world, your assumption is that every plane you see flying over head is empty?
Given that the structures collapsed at very close to free fall rates, all the beams and columns would have to have been heated to that magic point. All the beams and columns failed almost simultaneously. Or would you have it another way?
Each floor was designed to hold a certain amount of weight. They weren't designed to hold the weight of all the floors above it. Do you understand now?
