WH supports Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act

So as not to have to answer the difficult questions.

 

Are you saying that women cannot have mental health problems while pregnant?

If so what are your "qualifications" to make that diagnosis?

 

Because if you think you can use your own words for the stages of human development no matter how inaccurate you are then others can do it , too.

If you call a fetus a baby then why can't we all call anything anything, like an adult an embryo or a baby a teenager.....

No because "baby" is a common usage term.

OOOPSS!!!!!!! DID YOU JUST SAY IT WASN'T A ""BABY"" !!!!!!!! ?????

WHY isn't it? You insist anything growing in a woman is a BABY...did you just say ZYGOTE !!

BOY , talk about hypocritical, now you believe a zygote ISN'T a baby but a zygote!!!

Having trouble wondering which way to waffle ?

 

Thats a lib catch phrase

I dont have anything against women's rights

 

Then you are Pro-Choice.

 

I didn’t say women’s rights I said women’s reproductive rights If you oppose women’s reproductive freedom then you are opposing an important right of women

 

Women have human rights

Whech should not include being able to kill innocent humsn beings

 

It doesn't.


It's hard to believe that you think if you force women to gestate it's not taking away their rights..it really is.

 

They are not allowed to kill innocent human beings. We are talking about forcing women to breed against her will. That is what embryos like you want to do. Hey why not call an embyo a puppy...think of the emotional mileage you can get.

 

But you do!

You want to deny women their individual reproductive rights to have an abortion under any circumstances whatsoever.

That means that you are OPPOSED to women's rights.

 

You just contradicted yourself!

 

I want to protect innocent human life

The woman has rights too

But not the right to kill

 

We are still just repeating ourselves

My answer has not changed since the last time

 

In other words you still want to VIOLATE the Constitutional Rights of Women!

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
It doesn't.


It's hard to believe that you think if you force women to gestate it's not taking away their rights..it really is.

So you think men have the right to kill (in war, executions) but women don't have that right ????

...so , NO, you do NOT believe women should have rights.


You do NOT want to protect "innocent human life" you want women controlled and punished like all Anti-Choicers...



I REALLY REALLY doubt you go around in a state of perpetual mourning for all those dead zygotes/fetuses.

......they do NOT in anyway REALLY affect your life....

 

Thank you for showing how you have absolutely no respect for women and your real goal is to punish them for having sex..

.....your fake wailing about "I only want to save innocent life" is exposed as fake with statements like yours here ""Liberal women may breed with dogs instead of humans""

 

WELL ,it DOES

Women may abort their fetus their BABY, their princess, their bun......women have that POWER ...and YOU don't

That REALLY is the issue, isn't it

 

I think government have a right to kill based on the rules of war

And since women have fored themselves into the military they are killing the enemy too

 

We are just repeating ourselves now

 

Why do embryos like you call zygotes babies?

 

So men have a right to kill innocent life but you feel women shouldn't have that right.


"Innocent life " is killed in war, actual living born people and BABIES......so you think that is OK....but innocent life killed by a woman which is part of her body isn't OK

I again noted your misogyny in the phrase "since women have forced themselves into the military"""


I think you exposed your reason for wanting to force women to gestate several times..

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Thank you for showing how you have absolutely no respect for women and your real goal is to punish them for having sex..

.....your fake wailing about "I only want to save innocent life" is exposed as fake with statements like yours here ""Liberal women may breed with dogs instead of humans""

Yes, you can't address those INCONVENIENT posts , can you?


Then quit repeating the asinine claim that you believe in women's rights but want to force them to gestate...that isn't possible...


But again, thank you for, in a couple of posts, exposing your true feelings about women....explains a lot


Women may abort their fetus their BABY, their princess, their bun......women have that POWER ...and YOU don't

That REALLY is the issue, isn't it

 

I've got the thousands of abortions done every year where the mother has her baby killed. Don't need anything else.

You said

Do you hate males?

I've not argued that legal rights start at birth, that has no bearing on what I have stated.

So you are against abortion then?

I do to as long as it doesn't indiscriminately kill another person, a baby. You're OK with the killing of the baby in the abortion.

 

Well , ya, you do need something else......you need proof that "babies" were killed and you don't have that.

If "babies" were being killed you have a legal responsibility to report it, you haven't so you have nothing.

Two inane replies with no point or meaning.

Then you're more confused than I thought

Of course not and no where have I stated I am.

I don't support killing fetuses, I support women's right to choose to kill their fetuses.

.


That means you do NOT support women's right to their own bodies, a right YOU have but don't want women to have...

No baby is killed in an abortion.

 

Hypothetical for the forced birth fetishists to ponder:

You're trapped in a burning fertility clinic with an infant. You can either rescue the infant, or the 1,000 FERTILIZED VIABLE embryos the clinic houses. Which do you choose to save and why?