Why racism truly doesn't exist.

Ah, the old phony link to a pretend news source claiming someone said something without any actual proof. Thought you had actual links to where the professor actually said those things. Guess I should have know better the minute I saw it was FOX " news"

 

"they used to fund Hamas"?

Robert Byrd "used to" be in the KKK , should we condemn him forever?

Southern Democrats "used to" be the Confederate slave owners, should we condemn them forever?

Post a link to Saudi Arabia funding Hamas.

 

Why do Asians exceed whites in academic performance?

 

Lets put it this way, did America mess with the middle east before the Middle East messed with America.

 

rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun

1. prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
   "a program to combat racism"
   synonyms: racial discrimination, racialism, racial prejudice, xenophobia, chauvinism, bigotry, casteism
   "Aborigines are the main victims of racism in Australia"
   • the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
     noun: racism

Stereotyping is what the OP is talking about, and doesnt really fit into the definition of racism. Most racism is indeed more accurately 'culturism,' aka- the negative treatment of (members of) other cultures based on the view that ones own culture is superior. Stereotyping folks into a culture based on their skin color is racial stereotyping, not racism.

If a person is willing to change their view on someone to 'favorable' upon learning that the person is not associated with the originally assumed and disliked culture, then they are not racist, because race was not the source of their animosity.

That being said, racial stereotyping is still lazy, ignorant and something we should be pushing to reduce in society, but its not racism.

 

Saudis fund extremist Mosques and Muslim schools all over the world.

they fund extremist rebels in Syria.

they are a big part of the Jihadist problem.

but the USA treats them like best buddies.

 

Please tell us all about it with links. Because Great Mitten and other European countries had control over most of the middle east milking them for their oil resources for decades, common sense would dictate that if they were mad at anyone it would be them.

 

Where are the links to the news sources?

 

Ronstar,
The question that I ask is . . . WHY? The answer that I have found revolves around, making enemies to fight with ulterior motives. Pessimistic? Nein! Skeptical? Jawohl!

 

For your assertions regarding Saudi Arabia being a state sponsor of terrorism.

 

sorry, thought this was common knowledge

 

So you have no proof and are simply making stuff up then? Is this where you resort to kook conspiracy blogs for your proof?

 

Saudi Arabia and extremism
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saudi/analyses/wahhabism.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/19/opinion/saudi-arabia-qatar-isis-terrorism.html

https://www.salon.com/2016/01/06/sa..._u_s_relationship_with_the_theocratic_nation/

http://www.newsweek.com/terrorism-europe-link-saudi-arabia-brand-islam-uk-ambassador-636232

 

So, you are not computer literate enough to actually look for it, or just so prejudiced in beliefs you don't dare??

See- that is how it works, you get some warped ideology in your head, jump to preconceived conclusions and then you can't look at anything that might diminish it for fear you will be wrong. Well, you are wrong. Here's a few more "suspicious" reports on the article. let's start with the Daily Mail in England.
Dare you look at that, or are the English conspiring with the right too??

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-white-families-promote-white-supremacy.html
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10069
https://www.infowars.com/dingbat-professor-claims-families-are-incubators-for-white-supremacy/


Search "CUNY professor white nuclear" and find a long list, even a you-tube article. Take your pick.....

 

Documented evidence of Saudi funding and support for extremists and terrorists?

here you go:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/19/opinion/saudi-arabia-qatar-isis-terrorism.html?_r=0
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-saudi-arabias-funding-islamist-extremism-uk/
http://henryjacksonsociety.org/wp-c...7/Foreign-Funded-Islamist-Extremism-final.pdf
http://news.sky.com/story/saudi-arabia-top-of-the-list-in-funding-extremism-in-britain-10937309
http://www.independent.co.uk/News/u...press-tory-uk-release-sensitive-a7773146.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/24/...-on-saudi-money-to-support-syrian-rebels.html
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-wagner/saudi-arabias-dark-role-i_b_3402447.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ng-extremism-in-europe-says-former-ambassador
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ahhabism-qatar-kuwait-islamists-a7473551.html
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-yousaf-butt-/saudi-wahhabism-islam-terrorism_b_6501916.html
http://metro.co.uk/2017/06/05/what-...tive-form-of-islam-from-saudi-arabia-6685583/

 

I think the racialist argument has merit. Blacks are clearly more impulsive and violent due to their diminished intelligence. But that does not mean they can't learn to control their behavior the same as everyone else.

The biggest problem imo is the controlled left that makes excuses for black violence and criminality. To such an extent that antisocial behavior has been normalized and blacks who hold themselves to a higher standard are accused of "acting white". Regardless of how well black parents try to raise their children they are pressured to conform and behave like lawless savages.

 

No I am just offended by posters too lazy to bother to verify what they post by following up to the original sources. Good to see you are capable of making the effort when pushed. Next time do it before posting.

 

Even you should know the history of the Middle East. You know like the formation of Isreal or the Shah of Iran. And why would you assume they are not mad at the European countries. Do you ever read the news about terrorist attacks in Europe.

 

When and where did the first big attack come?

 

You should practice what you preach.

 

The Muslim world had every right to be angry at the destruction of their Islamic Caliphate.

 

You will have to develop that claim for me.

The British did not develop Saudi Arabia's oil resources. The Americans did.

 

"Saudi Arabia has become more serious about extremism; some experts regard it as the top counterterrorism partner in the region. It has taken a zero-tolerance approach to ISIS and joined the American-led coalition fighting the group." Contradicts your assertion.
"that appear to have links to extremism" Appears to have?
Third link has nothing to do with the U.S.
Fourth link has nothing to do with the U.S.
"which allegedly focuses on the role of Saudi Arabia." Fifth link has nothing to do with the U.S.
"The support for the Syrian rebels is only the latest chapter in the decades long relationship between the spy services of Saudi Arabia and the United States, an alliance that has endured through the Iran-contra scandal, support for the mujahedin against the Soviets in Afghanistan and proxy fights in Africa." Contradicts your assertion.
"Saudi Arabia financed and armed mujahedin fighters who resisted the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and shortly after the war many jihadists turned their guns on the Saudi government. Riyadh continues to view Al Qaeda and its affiliates as a threat to the ruling family's Islamic legitimacy." Oh my say it ain't so.
Fourth link has nothing to do with the U.S.

I'm too tired to keep debunking, you slapped a bunch of links up there and obviously thought no one would check...........wrong.

 

More B-52 carpet bombing can cure that.

 

Obviously, you are one of those people that have to have proof the sun is up before you will get out of bed.
Never had any respect for people who expect others to do their work for them- and are offended when someone suggests they move their sorry butts and do for themselves.