The mob goes after Tucker Carlson.

Liberals from Huffington Post which publishes hit pieces on him.

 

Incorrect. There are 7 definitions of violence. One being non physical. I've cited the sources to clear up your confusion. Glad I could help

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence
https://www.gov.nl.ca/VPI/types/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamara-star/domestic-violence-isnt-al_1_b_5788042.html

 

Yes, that what he should have done.
Otherwise he presented himself as a miserable whiner, i.e. aggravated the problem.
The problem is pretty big, recipients will always vote for those who support special privileges ( Affirmative Actions) making election process illegitimate and corrupt.

 

Carlson was promoting the idea men should be superior to women in America, you know, empowering slugs like Harvey Weinstein. It's not an act of feminism to call pro-male oppressors like Carlson out. In a time when women are finally breaking the silence, Carlson wants them back in the closet. What were the producers thinking?

 

100% false.

He just points out facts about Discrimination Against Men.

Men have a fundamental human right to speak about discrimination affecting us. Unfortunately Liberals want men to be silent.

 

There has been discrimination against women for decades. Why are we all of the sudden concerned about discrimination toward men? Because women aren't being silent, does that intimidate men? Is it because Harvey Weinstein and Bill O'Reilly's careers have been destroyed by courageous women who came forward? I think there is reason why there are few female employees at Fox, and its because of programming like this.

 

Because men are human. Since 1776 all free humans have a right to talk about discrimination they experience.

The enemy, like Huffington Post mob want to deprive "privileged" humans of our Fundamental Human Rights.

 

If you want to uphold human rights, then you should be abhorring things like deportation and mass incarceration for marijuana possession. Not just the victimhood of men.

 

1) On the first two points I agree with Liberals 100%.

2) The fact that Liberals want to deprive "privileged" humans of their most fundamental right -- to voice and organize on their issues is evil.

A male victim of DV who is arrested rather then helped is not an oppressor. His abuser is not oppressed.

 

While men may be victims, they had more power long before women did. Even in the 70's, a woman couldn't press charges against a rapist. Men have a lot more power, influence, and are less victimized then the very people that match that description like Carlson would like to admit.

 

Even if some rich men do have power, the vast majority of men have no more power then the vast majority of women.

Liberals who want to take away men's right to speak and organize on the issues which affect them are the enemy. The main forms of discrimination against men are: men getting 63% longer sentences for the same crime, Presumption of Guilt, Male Bashing in Mainstream Media, lack of help for male DV victims.

 

What that a typo?

 

IIRC that was more about abuse aimed at women in general and the kinds of responses they were pushing for would cover abusive and threatening behaviour in general, regardless of the source or target. My point remains that there will be subsets of the trolls and abusers which will target anyone or anything (and some individuals who will literally target anyone while pretending to be someone actually opposed to them). Trying to make it about on political position or class of person alone only creates further conflict.

 

The dogs are barking loudly -- Tucker must be making a good impact:

The enemy wants to control every word men say. The enemy wants men to be afraid to excercize our legal and moral right to voice our issues.

 

1. this is a mega-partisan problem not a partisan one. 2. Cultures have always found ways to punish unpopular speech and ideas. 'Political correctness' is a name we have attached to this process if we don't like when it happens to our side. 3. The lack of civility in political and social discourse is as old as society. It was bad before the printed press, but after Guttenburg is got a lot worse. After radio and television it got a lot worser. After post internet social media, it got a lot worser than worser.

 

So, cause one group was discriminated against for "X" amount of time, its fair to discriminate against another group? How about laws that get rid of discrimination without forcing new discrimination on someone else and call it a day?

 

Well I think he's really denouncing this male privilege concept. Males aren't privileged. They are never seen as needing rescue or help. They are treated as expendable in military and other situations where there are threats to life. They are seeing this holding a duty to protect and not harm others they have a duty to uphold Society none of this has ever been on women.

 

You have conveniently forgot that men were discriminated on much wider scale. They had to go to war and die or work so hard that they were dying in their fifties.
you are participating in spreading unbielivable dishonesty.

 

I love to see people stand up to suffocating, politically correct, liberal thought.

 

Sadly some feminists laugh at the fact that tens of thousands of men die from overdoze (at 2:05)



I am 100% for gender equality, but all men must understand how hateful some enemies are.

If Feminism is for gender equality, then it is every men's duty to support Feminism by standing up to misandrists. Given that 90% of misandrists are Liberal, every sane man should support President Trump.

I support Feminism if it means Equality, thus I hope misandrists get cancer.

 

The Left does not have a monopoly.

 

Criticism is one thing personal attacks and threats of violence against the speaker of unpleasant truths quite another.

 

Pretty damn close though.

 

You mean because it is branded on the internet, I can't disagree with these definitions? Is the english language now subject to internet approval?

 

Definitely. Tucker Carlson is like a whistle-blower pointing out facts about discrimination. He is not guilty of Hate Speech by any standard.