As long as the arbitrator is following the law they will say sorry that turns a liquidated damages clause into a penalty clause. So no she will not owe 20 million. Liquidated damages clause vs penalty clause Civil contractual breaches are not treated as punishment. If one breaks the contract the other will not be allowed to weaponize the contract breach and use it as a penalty. So she may owe 1 million but the breaches do not compound. Liberal talk radio where the host is a lawyer is great for ruining Trump supporters days.
1. Their NDA contract does not have liquidated damages clause 2. The party that breached the NDA is responsible for actual, not punitive damages to the other party. While these damages are often hard to quantify, courts may find her liable for "just" $10 mln, or $5 mln or $2 mln.... Works for Trump 3. Last but not the least, she is really screwed....by Trump....again...royally again.... Trump has virtually unlimited financial resources, if Trump does not quickly win in court, he will keep appealing and suing and her lawyers will suck her dry, rather sooner than later. The favorite porn star of the TDS crowd f*cked with a wrong president PS 4. stop listening to liberal talking heads, they mess with yours
Trump has exposed himself as a sex pervert, a sex assaulter, and the biggest liar that has ever subjected the institutions of the USA to international disgrace. Stormy is going to bring the big scam artist down. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...bc50284fce8_story.html?utm_term=.b69b25627682 "In pre-Trump days, it might have been possible to destroy Daniels by calling her a slut or whatever. But Trump himself is a slut. He is a liar and a moral harlot who revels in irresponsibility and bad-boy behavior. He has no moral edge over his accuser. We have all been instructed by Trump himself to disregard schoolhouse virtues of honesty, dignity and rectitude. Trump himself travels light."
Stormy is going to need a massive amount of gigs to pay her bills. Prediction is she will end up as a truck stop lot lizard over in Monroe LA in a decade.
I have actually been so happy with it, the media (both sides) are doing nothing but putting nail after nail into their coffin and it will eventually be sealed. The absolute ridiculous partisanship by both sides makes listening or watching the news channels an absolute joke, there is literally not reason to do so and more and more people are agreeing. The trend is even more prominent among the younger so called "Generation Z" who's views appear to be hyper Libertarian and against the authoritarian nature of both parties. You tube commentators and podcasts are the thing of the future and along with cable cutting, the old fashioned news outlets are soon to be dead. You can tell now when you log into things like Wapo or The Gaurdian and they are constantly begging you for money. I can't wait for another decade to go by and for the Libertarian wave to sweep over, well, man I hope so .... But the fiscal and identity authoritarianism of the Left along with the moral authoritarian of the Right will be the casualties of the next generation .... at least that's what I have been reading into the studies of the new generation
Because Trump is president she would face no breach of contract judgement for 3 reasons: 1. Preset agreed penalties generally are never upheld. The most common examples are lease agreements that state some massive automatic penalty if the lease is broken by the tenant. While contracts may have such language, that does not mean they enforceable. Nearly anything can be put into a contract. That does not mean it is enforceable. 2. You can not have a penalty against someone's free speech rights in a POLITICAL context. Because Trump is president, all she has to do is in anyway frame her statements - verbal or written - in a political context. 3. There can be no enforceable contract about illegal conduct. In fact, since prostitution is illegal, threatening her with a $20,000,000 lawsuit if she tells her claim that Trump engaged in the illegal activity of hiring her for sex constitutes criminal blackmail and extortion - which obviously no court would uphold. The lawyer could be disbarred or even prosecuted just for the threat. Simply put, there will be no lawsuit against her. That is just a lawyer's buff. Lawyers threaten lawsuits that couldn't possibly win all the time. Nor could such a lawsuit starve her out as hundreds of lawyers would represent her pro bono for the publicity of it.
what hypocritical bs. Clinton stuck his cigar in the vagina of an intern and you lefties golf clapped for him so save us the faux bs posts.
Yeah, the only chance Trump has at compensation is on any money from a book deal or talk show circuit. Simply saying she will owe 20 million because she mentioned it a certain number of times is laughable.
People with high moral standards don't vote for vulgar crooked clowns. No Sarah Palins, no Donald Trump
Wives are a personal choice But in a competative retail market price matters Thats why trump is trying to level the playing field for American workers
Unless he can get American garment laborers to work for $1.00 an hour, then he is just jerking your chain in a pathetic attempt to explain his shopping out his own production.
Trump just denied that he even know about the $130,000 payment. How is an agreement binding if one of the parties didn't even know it happened? Or did Trump just lie to everyone? Man, this is just comical.