Is this BBC? BBC seems to be covering more and more 'taboo' subjects. I have a question.. Is England a sexually open and allowing place or does England have 'reservations' of impurity to all its citizens. The reason I ask is that the news broadcaster, reporter, seems as if he is a sexually open male person in England. Why? I guess the way his British Accent is loose and discloses many 'personal' secrets of others' lives... What is the difference between disclosing another person's own personal 'taboos' by investigation and 'digging' up the secrets and disclosing an isolated or somewhat 'buried' occurrence that has already taken place and been 'dealt' with properly? Proverbs 16:27 "An ungodly man diggeth up evil: and in his lips there is as a burning fire." In other words, how did a non Korean news reporter ever 'stumble' onto this news story to cover and investigate? Did this Korean family or friends of the family call the News Agency and ask for help in getting 'justice'? Remember... All the shots of the family hugging, meeting, etc... they are all 'recreated'... meaning that they had to 'act' out these scenes on camera to 'recreate' what occurred the first time. They sure know how to look sad and extremely happy as it might have been the first time, huh? Train stations, homes, family members, neighbors, friends, car rides... the whole shabang... They even go INTO the homes and video them massaging their feet, IN PRIVATE.. What a class.. Not only did they have to do a little 'spring cleaning' before they entered but they also had to sit there and have the cameras video them doing personal, intimate things. What a Global world.. Friends, I guess. A Korean home which might never have had a non Korean guest in their home, all of a sudden having British young males in their Jeans and dress shirts, taking off their shoes, donning their own socks in the homes, (hopefully their socks were clean and respectable), and not only that but they, not speaking a word of English, would probably have been interviewed by a Korean/English Translator. I remember when a 'stranger' had to enter into a home and take off their shoes, their white socks were more 'not washed' and bleached than what upright HighSchool students wear to school. 'It was a hectic day. My socks absorbed all the perspiration. Sorry for the smell'. But on T.V, they are heart throbs. Have you ever had a Korean visitor into your home who was 'unwashed' and didn't prepare to enter in? Even their very own socks are a bit 'different' than what is normally in your home. But these news journalists and translators and camera men/women, KNEW that they were going into a home as guests. Why didn't they bring acceptable attire to have the interview IN THE HOME and not in the Park or something? Why weren't these Koreans asked to meet in a Hotel Lobby or a home of one of their own team members? And many many many times, one or a few usually has to use the restroom, right? What do they do in a Stranger's restroom? Undress and masturbate? A respectable person would never enter into a home where the shoes need to be taken off unless it was for truly REAL important things... not just for an interview of some past thing that was covered, buried and dismissed. Homes are Sanctity and Privacy and Peace.. Not Strangers' Entertainment of how others live. Absolutely low class wealth. It may not be Buckingham Palace, but it IS their Palace. They treat others' homes as if they were Public Libraries. So you speak English? And? What do you want? A foot massage? Why are the videos that show these sorts of things ONLY done with and by English Speakers? All around the Globe? Is it their way of 'getting back'? Are English speakers not as 'up to par' as they are thought of? In other words, are they more laid back but somehow got tied with an ideation of being upright to which they do not want? Who tied these ideations upon them, if they are not? Why and how are these ideations continuing? Could it have anything do with Government(s)? The U.S didn't want to enter into either WWI or WWII. They tried to remain neutral to both of them but they somehow got 'tied' in unwillingly. Could these have been the beginnings? Why can't The U.S be like it was pre-Judicial System 'amendments' and 'non Established' Laws so that The U.S can be The U.S, again? All of the changes within The U.S occurred AFTER Judicial Rulings which were more on the 'far left' side than straight down the middle from Generations passed.
Remember 1973, Roe -vs- Wade? Woman's right to abort the fetus? Was this the beginning of non planned pregancies? Pregancies require enough time for the male to ejaculate within the woman. Pregnancies by forceful penetration and male ejaculations within a frightened woman, rape, for that length of time, is not the norm. The male needs enough time to build up to climax, ejaculation, also. I can see how being 'raped' at the threat of losing the life can force any person to spend the time to not struggle until the raper is finished. That's alot of 'free time' the one that was raped, usually through breaking and entering, has to be alone and without any security measures to prevent or alert another person or neighbor if their home should be broken into. Rapes done in public places in hiding, unseen places, requires the victim to have been in a place where they might not should have been when others were not around. If many are concerned about 'rape', why not set up security measures to do your own part in keeping your own self safe? How? Talk to another person who might have other 'objective' ideas of how to. You might see a possibility that never crossed your mind. Remember, I'm not talking about 'rape' alone but Pregnancies through rape. 'Rape', is in the category of Physical Assault. There are other 'things' in the category of Physical Assault. Physical, not verbal, bullying is also 'rape' in a sense. What's going on with the 'grooming' policies and laws and safeguards and security measures in England now days? As well as for the Legal Penalties for committing this Law-less-ness? What is being placed in front of the other? Personal monetary profits or safe well being for the children and/or family homes and communities? So BBC might have covered a 'slave story' which might have been solved, resolved and taken cared of Judicially and Fairly but are they also covering stories of the current 'grooming' stories which has not been solved, resolved or taken cared of Judicially and fairly? It might not have been BBC... But whoever Mr. Marcel Theroux works for and with, should really watch what kind of stories they choose to televise world wide. Marcel Theroux Born Marcel Raymond Theroux 13 June 1968 (age 50) Kampala, Uganda Residence Tooting, London, England https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcel_Theroux
