The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

Says the guy who bought the OCT lock, stock and barrel. Once is way too much and is considered a war crime by every international treaty that the US government is a signatory to that identifies war crimes and a violation of the Constitution.

 

This scene is from a movie but it shows what goes on in Latin America.

État de siège, Costa Gavras, 1972 comme si c est 2018



There's a torture training scene at the 34:04 time mark. At the 1:04:48 time mark the puppet politicians recieve their torture equipment from the US government.

(from post #1445)
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-73#post-1069719148


edit
-------------------------

There's a lot of good info on this in Spanish.

Dan Mitrione _ El Maestro de la Tortura.

 

Here's the same video in Spanish.

Uruguay, TUPAMAROS, PELICULA ESTADO DE SITIO 1973, COSTA GAVRAS,



At the 1:16:40 time mark action by death squads is shown. Watch it for about four minutes. I couldn't find the full movie with English subtitles which didn't surprise me. Here's some info in English about the movie in case someone wants to try to find it with English subtitles.
https://www.google.es/search?rlz=1C...0i67k1j0i131k1j0i10k1j0i22i30k1.0.QN6Nkqx2xsA

This is kind of confusing to some people I suppose so here's some more info.
https://www.telesurtv.net/english/a...rventions-in-Latin-America-20160608-0031.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Terrorism/torture101_SOA.html

This is important.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/american-imperialism.371897/

The Latin Americans I've spoken to say that when citizens protest against these puppet governments, their pictures are taken and they are identified. Later, death squads visit them in the night and kidnap them. Most of them are tortured and then killed. Their bodies are later found on the sides of roads with obvious signs of torture. This is a deterrent to the people; they are afraid to protest against the puppet government. That's why they have death squads and torturers.

This subject came up because the pro-official version posters on this thread didn't seem to think the US government was capable of sinking low enough to kill witnesses and wistle-blowers.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-66#post-1069672300

I'm posting this info to show them that it is so this is not off-topic. It's part of the big picture.

 

didn't buy anything lock, stock and barrel ... why do you keep saying that? ...

 

Because you spend nearly every single day promoting and defending it, have never questioned any significant part of it and ridicule everyone who posts anything that contradicts it, applying your silly invented label ("troofer") to all who question and/or contradict it even when supported by fact.

 

wrong again Bob ... repeating lies doesn't make it true ... having said that, I do agree with the vast majority of the official versions of events ... and I shall continue to label those who have outlandish unproven theories as troofers ...

you want to believe so badly that the govermen was behind the attacks that you dismiss all evidence of hijackings, impacts, scientific reason and just plain common sense ... don't you just find it a bit odd that the main CTs that have been floating around for so many years have never been exposed? ... JFK, the moon landings, etc? ... no deathbed confessions ... no Pulizter Prize winning exposes ... nothing ...

you will go to your death bed paranoid Bob ... but keep up the good fight while still walking this mortal coil ...

 

Correct, however all your posts including this one though proves what I posted about you is 100% true. You are a die hard defender/promoter of the OCT, there's not one shred of evidence in any of your posts that proves otherwise.

... including anyone who questions/contradicts the OCT and even provides a mountain of evidence. And you never question anything about the OCT of any significance. All you ever do is prove what I said is 100% true.

I never said the US government was behind the attacks so that is false. Having said that there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence that shows elements within the US government, more specifically within the Bush administration, are criminally complicit in many different ways. The "evidence" of hijackings are based on a scam report (the 9/11 Commission Report) and not on incontrovertible evidence. "Impacts" I have no idea what you're talking about. Scientific reason and plain common sense proves the NIST reports are a massive scam and there is no official proof that the 3 WTC towers were totally destroyed in seconds as a natural result of planes, damage, fire, a combination plus gravity. Common sense, science and history dictates that the only way 3 buildings can be totally destroyed in matter of seconds is by controlled demolition, no other natural event has been the cause of buildings being destroyed in such a matter, not even earthquakes and certainly no scientific experiment. The Broadgate and Cardington experiments have shown that steel framed structures can withstand exaggerated/loaded fires without collapsing and so have multiple real infernos throughout history including the one in the North Tower in 1977. There is a mountain of eyewitness accounts/evidence and video/physical evidence indicating the buildings were destroyed via explosions.

The rest of your post is the usual juvenile drivel not worth addressing.

 

enhanced interrogation is employed by fs

 

enhanced interrogation is employed by the majority of the countries in this world ... to deny this would be naive ...but to the troofers, it is a strictly US domain ...

Canada does it ... England does it ... Australia does it ... but the troofers think it is a strictly US and Middle East practice ...

their narrative is blinding ...

 

What is "fs"? "Enhanced interrogation" is a bullshit term for TORTURE designed for the simple minded to make them believe it isn't torture.

There is no such thing as "enhanced interrogation". Torture however, is employed by the majority of GOVERNMENTS in this world. So does that mean to you that it's ok for the US government to torture people, because the majority of governments employ torture?

Can't you write a post without using your idiotic "troofer" term? This latest discussion is about torture (even though it's supposed to be about the Pentagon on 9/11), not about "troofers".

 

Torture is a vague subject, and cannot be broad brushed.
Listening to Slim Witman music can be torture.
Slowly cutting off fingers can be torture
Slapping the subject around can be torture.

 

Super egos of Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities on 9/11 jihad crusade for perpetual business of their pedophilia slave trade monopoly is clearly not worth consideration; like SCOTUS with an immaculate drug conception for a retired Army Staff Sergeant getting attacked with that national religion of baptizing eyes with urinations by Federal Lynching KKK churchstate cops in his hometown as SCOTUS business of thieving US Constitution arsonists the day JFK was assassinated after a purchase at the National Archives.​

 

duly noted that you did not address aircraft strikes ... holograms Bob? ... show me the mountains of evidence indicating the towers were destroyed via explosions ... wishful thinking Bob? ...

 

relying on movies now Scott? ... you've hit a new low ...

 

troofers lol ... any bullshit to avoid hard evidence ... not even the leftist tool, Sean Penn has taken up your cause ...

fringe cult of paranoid freaks ...

 

In what context? There are videos showing airplane strikes, and .... ?

What holograms?

The video evidence, multiple corroborating eyewitness accounts of explosions (heard, seen, felt, causing injury and death), the photo and eyewitness accounts of the resulting destruction to the 3 towers and the surrounding area is quite a bit of evidence of explosive forces at work. You yourself acknowledge that explosive forces are fully capable of such destruction. I duly note that a genuine forensic criminal investigation is required to confirm it.

I'll ask you a similar question, show me the evidence that the towers were completely destroyed in seconds as a natural consequence of planes, damage, fire or any combination plus gravity.

No, science, logic and common sense.

 

I believe that is filmed by lots of people, from all different directions.

 

Because by your posts here it is apparent that you still believe the official story, 17 years later. That makes it look like you bought into the story lock, stock & barrel and still do not realize you were deceived.

 

ok nukeboy ...

 

What was the old low?

 

your constant spamming of New Pearl Harbor which has verifiable mistakes throughout ...

 

The New Pearl Harbor highlighted the many fallacies of the OCT using knowledge that was available at the time the video was produced. Some of the potential mistakes have been challenged via other hypotheses. These potential mistakes do not in any way change the vast majority of the video presentation or the theme, that the OCT is a massive lie.

 

which floors were hit was readily available information at the time ... it wasn't a "potential mistake" ... quit running cover for propaganda videos ...

 

You mean like you running cover 24/7 for the propaganda OCT?

 

the OCT is a figment of your imagination Bob ... are you going to cling to this nonsense until you're 6 feet under? ...