The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 1, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well good for you Bob, stand your ground as you sink into your man made swamp.

    I entered this thread when it suggested no plane hit the Pentagon. The rest of your wholly irrelevant hogwash is of little interest to me.
     
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This entire section of the forum should be of no interest to you at all, I already noted that. In your world the OCT is 100% true, that's all there is for you and anyone who believes otherwise is delusional, tin foil, troofer, etc. whatever label makes you feel comfortable with your world view. IMO you post here because you are not comfortable at all with the OCT and you're terrified that there could be a lot more to it than what you desperately want to believe is true. So you spend as much time here as you can defending it at all cost.
     
  3. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    something probably? ... could you expound on that a bit please? ... just for once E, would you kindly posit an alternative theory to AA77? ...
     
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You mean this video Bobby? Start at :42...


    Below is the transcript of what the guy ACTUALLY says. He says nothing about using the part to identify the airplane. If anyone thinks he says anything different, please post it.
    They will use the serial number stamped on that piece of debris to determine WHERE that piece was located on the plane. NOT to IDENTIFY the plane. Maybe there is another video you are referring to where someone actually says what you said they did?
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2018
  5. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Right.

    PARTS identification, not PLANE identification. Like the guys says in the video above. Used to determine WHERE on the plane the part came from.
     
  6. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Again, correct.

    PARTS identification. To determine WHERE on the plane it came from. Not using parts to positively identify a plane.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2018
  7. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct. Just the bits about it being a plane.

    Hey Bob, that's mostly true. I don't believe the official account 100%, but mainly it works for me.

    I congratulate you on an accurate comment!

    Wrong again Bob. I'm not terrified of anything about this. I hardly spend any time in the 911 forum as the place is largely populated by people like you. You are predominantly a point scorer. You don't ever show ANY tendency to view evidence objectively.

    The words crazily obsessed should have your name carved next to them; and whilst you think that makes you some sort of internet truth warrior, it really just makes you kinda weird.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2018
  8. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I ponder whether or not Eleuthera has watched this vid as he claims that all the aircraft debris could fit into the back of Toyota pick up ... why do troofers lie so much? ...
     
    yasureoktoo likes this.
  9. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    We'll see how Bobby spins this little white lie. Should be interesting.
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Bobby, tell us WHEN and WHY airplane parts are identified for an airplane ACCIDENT. You keep referring to Appendix J Materials Laboratory Examinations.

    Here's what Appendix J sayd in the beginning.
    So if someone finds a part and that may have been a factor in the aircraft accident, they'll submit it for examination. Show me where it says they submit parts in order to identify the aircraft.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure Gamo, they need to know where the wheels on a plane are after it crashes.

    Show me where it says they need to know where the parts belong on a plane because after all, they would never know that until there's a plane crash.

    Spinning is YOUR MO (as seen above) not mine.

    Of course.
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nice try Bobby.

    Why'd you lie about what was said by the NTSB person?
     
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why do you lie every time you defend the OCT?
     
  14. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Uh oh.

    Bobby got caught in a lie and wants to play games now...
     
  15. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So tell us. Did the NTBS person say he was going to use the part to IDENTIFY the plane? Yes or no?
     
  16. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    9/11 is not a game except to you. And the OCT is a massive lie that you defend with every single post you write. Why do you feel the need to defend such a heinous lie that cost many lives and is used as pretext to massacre hundreds of thousands of people since 9/11 and ongoing, seemingly endlessly? Do you take pride in defending crimes against humanity?
     
  17. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Dodge noted yet again.

    Did the NTSB person say they were going to use the part to IDENTIFY the aircraft. Yes or no?

    I'll help you. Here is what the person said:
    You claimed they said that the part would be used to identify the aircraft. Can you explain why you got this terribly wrong?
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2018
  18. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh look! ... more lies from the troofer cult ... *popcorn* ...
     
  19. Warm Potato

    Warm Potato Active Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2018
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Didn't Charlie Sheen make a documentary about this?
     
  20. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I seem to recall it was called "Bob gets it wrong and performs his tap dancing routine".

    Can I just echo this:

    Did the NTBS person say he was going to use the part to IDENTIFY the plane? Whas it yes or no?

    Come on Bob, lets just see if you can be honest about one tiny sub issue. Excuse the little bit of assistance. Know this. The longer you dodge this meaningless issue, the bigger it gets. It then becomes, well if he can't admit in your face mistakes, what happens when the Grand Jury turn round and dismantle all his other crap?

     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you boys are hilarious!
    someone dumped some **** out the back of their pickup and you think its 'the' plane when that freakin hole is completely blocked by the support posts!
    I know the debris exited the entry hole and snuck around back when nobody was lookin! LMAO
    Oh no I wont get the damage report, get it yourself and learn something.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2018
  22. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No he said they were going to figure out where the part belongs on the plane because after they identify the parts the report will read: "Part a15 belongs in section x12 of the plane, part b64 belongs in section y47, etc." you know, just like Bingo or any jigsaw puzzle. After all they have serial numbers on FDRs and CVRs just so that they know where these belong on the plane, they just can't possibly figure it out without those serial numbers. Oh except on not one of the 9/11 planes because they were so special, they were after all just for 9/11. And then when they figure it all out, they can say, hey this is where everything was on the plane, isn't that so cool that we figured it all out? Now let's crash the next plane so we can put the pieces where they belong again. Your apologist BS knows no bounds Gamo.
     
  23. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/

    "Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?""

    Does he count as an expert witness Bob? Why do you ignore his testimony?

    Some pictures showing parts from the plane:-
    https://www.businessinsider.com/the-fbi-pentagon-on-911-2017-5?r=US&IR=T

    There were clearly identifiable parts found and photographed, easily found online. Why do you not acknowledge these?
     
  24. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Right. So you lied when you claimed the person said they were going to use the part to identify the plane.

    Glad we cleared that up.
     
  25. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,694
    Likes Received:
    11,760
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your credulity is patent and laughable. Typical, to be sure, but laughable.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page