Medicare For All is best way to capitalism:

I'm sure I will survive but why should I have to pay for other's health care? It's the people who could actually afford it who are not buying it. I have insurance. My poor white-trash neighbors are already covered under government programs. People like my brother are the ones who will benefit from other's tax dollars. He makes enough to buy insurance but claims he doesn't.

 

No need to change then.

 

Because leeches want your money.
Many post on this forum

 

Because your brother knows we will.pay for him now anyway. We just do it in the most expensive way possible

 

Youd rather have your neighbors cost go up, subsidizing you so yours can go down

 

Nah.....everyone will pay less

 

Now it's really starting to smell in here

 

Yes I already know that you want federal single payer, but the take away is that this thread told me why: You don't want to pay taxes for it.

 

I have no idea how you got there. Lol

 

Try a shower. Lol

 

Ha!

 

Lol live birth only means one Tom for.

 

You didnt answer.
So surprised.

 

They could. That much is crystal clear.

Cut the military in half

 

Pretending I didn’t doesn’t change it.

 

You answered the vital statistics reporting question you were asked?
Fancy.
Must be invisible ink you write with

 

agreed

 

dear, we are talking about Medicare for all as the easiest prelude to capitalism. Once established all you do is publish prices and raise copays and you have capitalism. Less than 2 lines. Certainly you've got it now??

 

op is about single payer as base for capitalism. .5 lines. Surely you've got it now?

 

goofy liberal!!! govt pays 3 times more for Medicaid Medicare than Europe. Govt is famous for over paying becuase they use everyone else's money!!.

Only the Pentagon Could Spend $640 on a Toilet Seat | The Nation

https://www.thenation.com/article/only-the-pentagon-could-spend-640-on-a-toilet-seat/
Apr 11, 2016 - What your tax dollars go towards at America's defense headquarters.
Missing: 125 ‎| ‎Must include: ‎125

 

It still would not be capitalism.
It would be price fixing and government exclusion from markets.
Do you "Got it now?"

 

My point remains the same

 

I said, published prices, 100 times. Do you understand anything????????

 

what does that mean???