Should lethal force be used against illegal immigrants crossing the border?

I wish God would buy me a Mercedes Benz.

heck, even a Porsche. i'm not fussy.

 

I meant all of them. bullies and cowards are defined accurately in all dictionaries. I'm not sure about urban dictionary. But I'll check it out.

 

Wow, urban dictionary defines those two words better than an academic dictionary. See it.

 

Oh I caught your intended meaning very well that is why I said OK at the opening...I just wanted to point out that what one person considers to be a bully or a coward, someone else might not agree with those terms or definitions of those terms.

 

I think they still can turn back mexicans

But the centrals have soecial refugee status that gets them in the country

Congress needs to repeal that law

 

So water cannons are ok?

Or tear gas?

 

With all due respect. You're bloody nuts

This kind of response shows that we are deporting the wrong people

 

Mega Sweet!

 

I realized that after reading posts from trump's supporters.

"Fair is foul
and foul is fair
hoover through the fog
and filthy air"
Shakeaspear.

 

Laying aside any and all political afilliations, could it not be said that people are individuals and that some people, regardless of their political affilliations or their moral role models can be quite guilty of the same fault?

 

Highly unlikely. libs don't tell 7000 lies like trump does. Did you know that?

 

Once again, laying aside the political favoritisms, I am willing to bet that you cannot list 7000 lies accredited to Trump and provide proof for each one that he is alleged to have told.

 

Yes indeed lethal force should be used against illegals crossing our borders with special note of the women and the children.

Hell we should sell unlimited hunting licenses an used the funds to not only build the wall but to maintain the wall.

 

Starkly black or white options on your survey there Turin, lol. There is more than a little nuance that goes into dealing with proportional response of force. Thank God that our border patrol (& service men and women in the battlefield) are no longer neutered by the stupendous rules of engagement as during the last administration. So perhaps a lost and wandering family of 4 who crosses though the desert flagging down our border patrol for some life saving water should be treated differently than the scumbag cartel members who gunned down Brian Terry at the border during Holder's Fast & Furious (false flag) exercise... just saying, there might be a little gray area here where our BP officers exercise some 'thinking on their feet' discretion. Obviously, this is an anathema to the plutocrats sitting in their DC 'ivory towers', lol...



O... & yes btw ,of course, the (held in contempt of Congress) Eric Holder was just in Iowa considering a 2020 POTUS run...

 

Here's a bunch of trump's debunked lies. His lies grow faster than rag weed.

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

 

Yeah, women and children make easy targets who are always unarmed. Bullies and cowards favor them.

 

6980 to go.

 

There is an easy solution. Instead of calling them illegals, call them fetuses. The Dems would be all in on killing them.

 

That's puerile.

 

Trump is not a conservative. Did you know that?

 

Wicked. Actually, the "evolved" position is that they can even kill newborns. In consultation with their doctor, of course.

"Mom, please, don't kill me."

"My body, my right!"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/va...n-controversial-third-trimester-abortion-bill

 

"They can't put anything on the internet that isn't true!" "Uh ... bon jure." (Cue French accordion music.)

https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7VOE/state-farm-the-internet-and-french-model

 

That is the beauty of the whole concept. Call them Fetal Americans. Think of crossing the boarder as coming out of the womb. Guys could wack them on the south side of the border and claim they are just a bunch of cells.

 

For 'f' sake. The rule of law in the United States and indeed anywhere else in the world that phrase means anything is that the use of force by any citizen or officer of the law needs to be proportional to the threat offered by the assailant. Yet this survey asks 'should lethal force be used against illegal migrants crossing the border' with no qualifiers. If I say 'yes' then fine, I am stating that it's OK to 'blow away' that 7 year old girl trying to cross the border while holding her mother's hand. If I say 'no' then I can't respond when a 'Coyote' leading a group of illegals across the border opens fire on me in a direct confrontation. I mean what's the point?