Lisa Page testified that DOJ prosecutors told agents NOT to charge Hillary with 'gross negligence'

Slowly but surely it is finally being revealed that the Obama "Justice" Department and the FBI under James Comey colluded to protect Hillary Clinton after she blatantly and very obviously broke laws involving national security and classified information:

Links:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ents-NOT-charge-Hillary-gross-negligence.html
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...gross-negligence-in-2016-and-doj-told-them-no
https://www.dailywire.com/news/44587/obama-doj-told-fbi-not-charge-hillary-lisa-page-ryan-saavedra
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ordered-fbi-not-to-prosecute-hillary-clinton/

The only question that remains is, when Robert Mueller is finally finished with his molecular-level 'investigation' of Donald Trump, will he go after Hillary and her stooges next? Surely a new investigation wouldn't take two years and nearly thirty million dollars to nail her stupid, negligent ass to the wall, along with all those clowns who covered up those crimes for her!

. "What?! Are you KIDDING me...?!"

 

The whole cast of characters should be put on trial. Comey, Loreta Lynch, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Huma Abeden, and Hillary. But who would do the investigation of this conspiracy? Mueller? He was in on it too.

 

So why hasn't trump? Why is he protecting her?

Lol, you guys

 

So you are saying that Trump's Justice Department and the Republican controlled Senate are part of the conspiracy by not charging Clinton with her "blatantly and obviously breaking laws". Not a question.

 

ALREADY posted.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/interview-of-lisa-page.552370/page-2#post-1070329361

Why the Redundant thread?

 

"Protect Hillary? What kind of joke is this? Did the poster ever watch a news broadcast, read a newspaper, listen to someone other than Rush? Or maybe it was all "fake news." "Fake news" is just another way of saying, "I'm too stupid and lazy to actually care about what's going on because Tump will tell me and that's all I need to know.

Comey indicted Clinton in a scathing rebuke that went way past DOJ guidelines for FBI authority, which is NOT to indict.. Then, days before the election, Comey announced the discovery of "new emails' discovered about Hillary. This was false and the air went out of the Hillary campaign like a punctured balloon. The pollsters couldn't keep up with the disaster so they "missed" it in their projections.

Will Mueller investigate yada, yada, yada? No, because if one was paying attention to the news (oh, wait, it's all fake) they would know this was outside Mueller's assigned mission.

 

The decision not to charge Hillary was consistent with the similar decision not to charge Alberto Gonzalez

 

why is Trump protecting Hillary from prosecution?

 

The thread you refer to is entitled, "Interview of: Lisa Page". The thread I opened is entitled, "Lisa Page testified that DOJ prosecutors told agents NOT to charge Hillary with 'gross negligence', and it is supported with four links to descriptive documents!

Sorry for you, Andy, that the FACTS surrounding Hillary's crimes against national security are being exposed, finally, along with the stunning conspiracy by the "Justice" Department and the FBI to cover it all up.

You Leftist Hillary-lovers have laughed at these FACTS pointing directly to her criminality for 2 1/2 years, saying, "Why isn't there any evidence Hillary broke the law?" Now that the evidence is finally coming out, your reaction is, "Why isn't Trump's Justice Department doing anything about it?" Well... 'the day is young' , Hillary's (and everybody else's) CRIMES are still well within the Statute of Limitations, and, BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR! Hillary and her fellow conspirators and protectors may yet find themselves in orange jumpsuits -- where they BELONG! After all, you radical Democrats DO believe in JUSTICE, don't you...?!

 

After all the dog pound chanting of "lock her up" why isn't Hillary in jail?

 

Like I said to Andy in the post preceding yours, "BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!" The applicable Statute of Limitations is nowhere close to expiration, and everybody who was involved in covering up Hillary's crimes against national security and classified information is very, very VULNERABLE. When you start adding up all the names, it's like a "who's who" of the Obama regime's big headliners....

 

Why sully himself when the torque is getting applied? No good reason, let it to others.

 

The corrupt obama admin made their mind up before the fbi concluded their case. It’s clear from the lynch/Clinton meeting the fix was in the bag

 

Yes how could Lynch have known Hillary didn’t want to go to prison unless she talked to bill! Lmao

 

IG already said there’s no evidence bias player a role in the Hillary decision. She didnt get charged just like Bush’s AG didn’t. Consistent policy.

 

She didn’t need bill to tell her that, but bill needed to know how the coverup was working

 

Oh so Lisa Page was just making all this up? Why would she do that? Does she want to go to jail by herself for perjury? This is the thread that is going to unravel the whole Hillary coverup conspriacy.

 

DOJ likely said don’t charge, because it’s their policy...same reason Alberto wasn’t charged

 

Poorly, didn’t you see the Comey press conference? Lol

 

Where he followed the obama admin’s order and didn’t charge her?? Yeah. Their corrupt coverup worked, that’s the evidence

 

Not according to the IG

 

Nice unsupported assertion, which the IG went to lengths actually to document. Pants on fire comes to mind....

 

Huh? What are you talking about?
What does the IG have to do with this? They don’t investigate crimes.
Lisa Page testified he obama admin ordered the fbi not to charge regardless of the investigation conclusions.

 

The DOJ decides who to charge. Deciding the way you don’t like is not necessarily evidence of some conspiracy. It’s consistent with how they handled Bush’s AG for doing something similiar. The IG found no evididence that bias player a role.

 

I have no problem with the obama admin making that decision just like I don’t with the trump admin.

The IG didn’t look into the obama admin, just the fbi and Comey. They did find massive corruption

What Bush’s AG did tr same thing?