California Magazine ban struck down by federal court

With how our government's laws worked as conceived of? Yeah sure sparky.

 

And yet here you are

 

Only an idiot would bring up the founders in connection with a shooting in Houston.

 

Since were talking constitutional law on self defense? Maybe if you had a brain you could understand.

 

Look up Travis Neel.

 

Only a moron would bring up the constitutrion concerning a shooting in the barrio.

 

You look him up.

 

Pipe down Lahey. Were talking constitutional law, keep up or frigg off

 

More than you.

 

Get a life. Everything doesn't revole around the constitution. It was just a justified shooting, nothing more, nothing less.

 

More than you.

 

You asked for an example. I give you one, and you duck and cover and posture. Quelle Suprise.

 

Sure son.

 

So you didn't look him up? What's the matter, nothing there?

 

You asked for an example of someone who needed more than 11 rounds. I give you one, and you pull your usual dishonest shenanigans. I'm not surprised, I must say.

 

Ha, you've posted nothing. Got an example, post it.

 

I’ve serviced and customized 1911s for a couple or more decades. When I am brought 1911’s with reports of FTE’s, FTE’s and failures to lock back, not an infrequent thing while there may be more than one cause, I have often found magazines to be the culprit. Sometimes the problem can be remedied with a change of mag which I will recommend over the cost (my time) of trying to sort the mag. There are a few good mag makers out there, such as Chip McCoromick, but while they have 10 rd mags, I have seen quite a few problems with their extended mags. I have run 1911s for a long time, it’s a great gun when everything is working, but I wouldn’t EDC one without insuring 100% reliability and I would never carry one without mags I know are 100%.
I have seen a lot of folks practice combat reloading, letting their mags drop free...in the process. Sure, that’s tac Cool, but...for practice and then EDC dropped mags? Not me. Many people don’t realize how critical it is to be 100% on the reliability of the mags they carry, and with some platforms, extended mags, particularly, those not completely tested for reliability...well, nothing can go wrong, eh?

 

Sounds like its vs civilians.

Should they be expected to hold a higher standard than the military?

 

There is no need to be upset.

 

Wrong-what we note is that future is unwritten and we MIGHT need more than ten rounds so we reject-as abject idiocy, any argument that we should limit ourselves to an arbitrary amount that seems to be based on Democrat Party legislation, rather than a rational assessment of risks in modern society: a society that seems to believe 17 rounds or so, is needed by civilian cops.

 

more centurion nonsense. I reload fast enough that brass from both magazines is in the air before the first mag hits the ground. I bet you cannot do that. But since you have failed to advance anything resembling a legitimate argument as to why private citizens should have less rounds in their home defense weapons than cops have, we are just laughing at the idiotic "need" based argument that has no support other than your opinion

 

What is the highest reliability 1911 magazine at 10 rounds and over?

My bedside stand gun (pistol) is a .45, an artifact from California politics but still a perfectly viable caliber. I can fire both +P and 45 super, maybe more. Need to try it against hog.
My BSG is not a 1911.

Now, as of the last week, I can own a 17 round mag for it, as well as drum mags for AR 15s/10's.

I get to spend the next month testing these new to me magazines for functionality in high priority situations.

That's besides the 9mm "carbines", .22's, and other firearms.

 

More DOJ instructor nonsense.

 

Wrong again, DOJ instructor.

 

No one said anything like that.