BREAKING: Bill Barr news conference 9:30am EST - Discuss

So, exercising the 5th?

 

You can read the report for yourself, it's all laid out in there. I'm not your research assistant.

Come back when you've read the report. If you have any questions, I can answer them.

 

No. Literally saying that while under oath. He’s very forthcoming under oath. If he had been placed under oath, he would have told the truth and been done with it. He would not have done the whole thing a second time, I believe.

 

"Every single piece of evidence seen" supports charges of collusion? Is that what you're saying, Aleks?

Pardon me for asking the OBVIOUS, but if that is true, then why is it that NOBODY was indicted? Not Trump, and not anyone else! Does it even begin to occur to the liberal-Left that the rest of us begin to question their objectivity AND even their SANITY?!

Suggestion: Do sane people obsess about a "There there", when even a team of reknowned legal experts found NO "There there" after spending $28 million dollars and almost TWO YEARS trying to find it...?! What is the MATTER with you people?!

I further suggest that you redirect your energies now to finding "Big Foot", or 'UFO's' instead. You'll probably have greater success than in proving "the Russians hacked the election for Trump"!

 

If you've read the entire thing then cite the law he violated. Cite a news source showing the law he violated. Its your claim he did so support it.

 

Yea, we can. Go cite the law he broke.

He broke your heat by winning? Is that a crime?

 

Reading comprehension? You're seeing an "I" where none exists. Go back home Vladimir, you're drunk.

 

There you go again, seeing an "I" or an "eye" where none exists. Stop it, aye aye captain?

 

He asked people to lie for him lol
He refused to testify
His written answers were mostly I don’t recall
Lol unprecedented cooperation

 

He said he wasn’t going to accuse trump of a crime in his report because he couldn’t refute it. That’s up to congress.

 

I'm trying to understand the logic you propose... so, the Mueller team spent two years and $28 million dollars digging into every conceivable aspect of the "Russia Collusion" thing -- and from the very beginning, THEY HAD NO INTENTION OF BRINGING ANY INDICTMENTS, OR CHARGING ANYONE WITH CRIMES?! Is that what you're saying? I just want to be sure....

 

They're in such a shambles that they retook the House! Oh woe!

Bonespurs won't appeal--at all--to the mass of voters in the middle. He's an extremist, incompetent and a danger to the rule of law. ****ing gross.

 

Nowhere does Mueller indicate an investigator was prevented from doing anything. Mueller did not say I would have prosecuted [instance x, y, or z] but lacked [x,y, or z]. Mueller never establishes a crime occured.

 

Of course you wouldn't allow him to testify under oath. That would be insane.

 

It would have been historically bad if they didnt. Historically unprecedented.

I remember Democrats predicting theyd take the Senate, too.

 

Lots of people got indicted and charged. So I have no idea why you’d think that’s what I’m saying.

 

What crimes?

 

For “process” crimes. Not for “Russia-Trump”.

 

The Russians were not indicted for process crimes. They were indicted for their criminal activities to help trump.

 

And Trump has no involvement in that.

 

Nah he just lied about who did it

 

They helped Hillary and she still lost. Obama was spying on Trump and she still lost.

 

You're evidently having difficulty understanding what I asked, so, I'll repeat, with some parts emphasized for easier comprehension:

"I'm trying to understand the logic you propose... so, the Mueller team spent two years and $28 million dollars digging into every conceivable aspect of the "Russia Collusion" thing -- and from the very beginning, THEY (the Mueller Team) HAD NO INTENTION OF BRINGING ANY INDICTMENTS, OR CHARGING ANYONE WITH CRIMES?! Is that what you're saying? I just want to be sure...."

You'll notice that I didn't ask about such abstruse, unrelated topics, like Paul Manfort's having been engaged in money laundering in Ukraine years before 2016, or the philosophical implications of the 'Buridan's Ass' conundrum, or natural gas futures in Azerbaijan. No... I asked about the 'Mueller Report' specifically... to wit -- WHO exactly was indicted? WHO was charged? WHO was identified as having broken any (ANY) laws...in the Mueller Report?

If the answer is "NOBODY", then I thank you in advance for my daily dose of Leftist distraction, deflection, and obfuscation....

 

Half the presidents campaign are now admitted felons, we now see the extent he went to obstruct justice, bunch of Russians indicted for their crimes...if you wanna pretend these things never happened I can’t blame you, but don’t expect me to feed into these delusions

 

Reality is coming.