The Climate Alarmist 97% Lie !!!

Apparently you aren't familiar with what has been occurring around the Arctic circle where perma frost is melting so fast and liquefying the soil that the permanently installed scientific monitoring instruments were all destroyed and washed away.The melting is only INCREASING RAPIDLY!!

 

Why do you suppose the ice glaciers on Greenland are gaining ice and getting thicker?

The Arctic ocean is quite large and not all of it is the same as the rest.

The arctic region of the world is the northernmost area of the world covering approximately 14.5 million square kilometers (5.5 million square miles) and is described three ways. One definition of the arctic is any land north of the ArcticCircle, which is the latitude of 66° 33' 44” (or 66.5622°).

 

I was trying to see if you knew what the predictions in the literature were. Apparently you do not. I want the predictions SPECIFICALLY that threaten human existence. I gave a peer reviewed paper that indicated that human lives will not be at risk this century due to global climate change. I am looking for a peer reviewed paper to advocate against the predictions of the paper I referenced.

 

I don't know if there are. Personally I don't see why there would be any interest in such predictions. Predictions of what would happen "if we do nothing" are only relevant as related to "if we do something". Something that threatens "human existence" would be too broad to matter. I'm not saying they don't exist. I just don't recall seeing anything of the kind. Nor do I see any interest.

I have seen "what if" scenarios of many types. For example, of floodings in Florida at different stages within certain number of years and in different scenarios. But they are attached to a proposal of "doing something". To show that it's worthwhile. Otherwise, why spend the money on a study?

What peer-reviewed paper did you give? Please provide the link.

One of the most amazing things in that study you mention is that it would be proving a negative. Not easy to do.

 

If there is no predicted threat to the human food supply, why in the hell would we do anything?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378003000827

 

The IPCC is an agenda driven political body, filled with bureaucrats paid to push a political agenda. You may as well cite a think tank run by Breitbart or the southern poverty law center.

No, she is not, she is a government politician, and it's people like this, who go into government to push their own personal agendas that you want us to entrust with the power to control our lives and run our industries for us.

 

Hmm... ok, explain again why this shouldn't happen?

 

Wait a minute. There is so much wrong in your statement. First of all, this paper does not conclude that there is no threat to the human food supply. Not by a mile!

Did you read it? This refers to crop yields. Here is what the report says

The A1FI scenario, as expected with its large increase in global temperatures, exhibits the greatest decreases both regionally and globally in yields, especially by the 2080s.
​

A1FI scenario is equivalent to "if we do nothing" (A1 Fossil-Fuel Intensive). So there is the answer to your question. In some scenarios it might be :enough globally to get us through to the next century, but that doesn't mean there won't be shortages. Food will be expensive. And there will likely be famine in some regions.

Now, of course, crop yield is only one of the consequences of Climate Change. There are many more: raising sea levels, more violent whether phenomena, diseases, .... and so on. There are many reasons why we need to deal with global warming now.

 

Jesus read the entire thing...

 

And the right is scared stiff of her. And rightly so, because she is gathering the Parkland generation around her. The old 60+ Trump crowd is right to be afraid of her because she moves masses of the new upcoming generations. Unlike Trump who moves the outgoing elderly (Full disclosure: I am over 60, but not part of the Trump mass)

 

Is sweet Gaia sick? Why else would I care what the AMA has to say on the matter? Really? Then you have the IPCC, doesn't their name alone show the vested interest they have in this hoax? You folks are funny, you figure a few three letter groups will con the rubes, but decades of failed predictions have proven the farce for what it is...

 

COLUMN: Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa https://www.worldpropertyjournal.co...-cage-peter-reckell-kelly-moneymaker-2525.php