BREAKING: Robert Mueller is speaking right now, for the first time since the report was released

No it was the Russian meddling, pages spy activities are a separate issue.

 

Mueller, wisely I think, by repeating that his findings did not exonerate Trump, has placed the ball squarely where it belongs - with Congress.

Preventing impeachment proceedings will now be more difficult for Pelosi.

 

You mean like Eric WithHolder and crowd? Scandal free? Bwahahahahaha!

 

Learned on here there is no penalty for spouting bullshit, from either side, but primarily from so-called conservatives....

 

Incidentally, there are currently over 2300 active federal prosecutor OFFICES, not including the thousands or tens of thousands of "former" prosecutors.

https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=27

Well look at that.

Leftist NPC think....wrong again.

 

Maybe, as a foreign national, they think he has diplomatic immunity.

 

Which is exactly what I want. Further establish that this is the worst Congress in US History by filing an impeachment based on Mueller's theories. The Senate will not vote to impeach, and the House will be made to be the laughing stock that it is.

 

agree he should be in the history books as an impeached President

 

Did you get all current 2300 federal prosecutor offices to sign your letter yet.

 

Yet, she defended her stance within the hour... she ain't budging on today's news...

 

Prosecutors never exonerate anyone. They either find evidence to charge or not. He found no evidence of conspiracy so he certainly could have stated the same for the second part but instead played a political game.

 

Absolutely.

 

you will have to give me a link to Obama preventing people speaking about an investigation about him personally like Trump is doing

 

Making a poetic gesture? Well, that'd about fit what this hissy fit has been about. Sure, make a poetic gesture. To quote the former Mayor Rawlings: "We gave them space to destroy".

 

Still waiting for you to tell me what the "corrupt intent" was.

 

nope, after he loses the election, but before the next president takes over, not even sure you can impeach a President after they leave office

 

Republicans refuse to impeach, so Democrats are continuing to investigate to find enough proof to get republicans to where they have no choice but to do the right thing

 

The only thing "progressives" care about is power.

There's no need for you to "explain" why they hide their authoritarian and anti-democratic tendencies behind euphemisms such as "oversight"...

 

Huh??

"He found no evidence of conspiracy so he certainly could have stated the same for the second part" (which I assume is OOJ)??

Huh?

What does one really have to do with the other?? Not much, which is why he made them 2 separate volumes..

 

Mueller offered no "theories," of course. Nor will he.

I hope efforts to expose more of what Trump is desperate to hide will keep Congress busy until November, 2020, and that a consequently better-informed electorate then goes to the polls.

 

I think he made it clear he would of indicted Trump if he could have

 

I don’t remember seeing that. And it does not square with other facts in the report.

If Trump had thought about it and recinded his instruction, as you suggest, he wouldn’t have tried to pressure McGahn into lying about it, nor would he have pressured McGahn into claiming that there was no obstruction of justice, another obstruction that McGahn chose to ignore.

 

Proof of what? Bigfoot?

 

Volume 1: Dang It.

Volume 2: Here's What I Wish We Had Found

 

Mueller registered as a Republicans... I never said he was a partisan Republican