There is not one candidate that is advocating for "full on socialism, censorship and open borders". NOT ONE. You are making it up because you heard the terminology and have grasped it thinking the word sounds like a good talking point. You have little to no understand of what democratic socialism or 'open borders' means.
President Barack Obama never did a single thing that was illegal, anti-democratic or harmful to the core of this democracy. You people on the right decided you hated him the minute he won the election and only because he was a Black man.
Where does Mueller say that in his report? Can you quote that in context? Because if you can't or won't I'm going to assume that is because it isn't there.
And should highlight the important question: WHAT DOES HE GIVE THEM FOR THE INFORMATION???? NO country gives anything away for free....will Americans suffer when it's PAYBACK TIME???
a drunk guy at a bar said he heard Russians hacked the DNC, boy that's outlandish lol. This above is exactly why all this faux outrage is laughable. Anyone who can't say what Hilary and the DNC did was wrong by paying 12 million to a foreign agent which they KNEW was getting dirt from a Foreign ADVISARY, should be bothered by Trump said. Your a political hypocrites with no value in this conversation.
Sure it's....he says in the Conclusion Section of Vol II (the last section of the entire report)...that it didn't conclude the President committed a crime. If you follow my link below scroll all the way to the bottom of the page and you'll find that section. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955290-Mueller-Report-Volume-II-Obstruction.html In Vol 1 the report clears the President and the Campaign of any conspiracy or collusion, but he states that clearly in the Introduction to Vol 1 Section on page 1 going into page 2...here's a link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html
You do know this was a hypothetical question...nothing actually happened. We do know some foreign agents work for cash...Clinton paid up
I do not know whether the President has that authority. I do know it has rarely been used. Of course, you claimed the opposite on both counts, but there is no reason to believe you on either one, given your long record of blatantly false claims. Here’s another one. Citizen’s United did not hinge on unelected official at all. Indeed, that had nothing to do with the suit at all.
No, you weren’t. I quoted almost the entire actual conclusion to you in an earlier post. I don’t have my copy next to me, or I would quote it to you again. The words you claim are in the conclusion do not exist. Period.
What planet do you live on? Oh, and nice race card. We didn't like Obama because he sucked, he's a liar, he loved dictators who hate us, he imported Muslims and illegals, he chased companies and jobs out of the country and he set back race relations 60 years.
I could not care less as to his skin color. As to his acts as being "illegal, anti-democratic, or harmful", that is a matter of opinion.....though I have no doubt that you would never view his actions as being pertinent.....just as many do not see them being pertinent to Trump. Though I am generally against Executive Orders, the DACA EC was very anti-democratic. Forcing people to buy a product (health insurance) was anti-democratic. Selling guns to cartel members, even if the intent was law enforcement was harmful. Claiming an attack in Benghazi, even when they knew that was not the case was harmful. Covering Hillary's lack of security of sensitive documents was harmful.
She is now that there is an Attorney General that isn't afraid to shake up Washington. There isn't to much to investigate. She destroyed 32,000 E-mails she was ordered to turn over to the FBI and had her own private server that she also used for government business. There is no doubt with either of those. Was there classified E-mail sent or received on either? Was she deemed innocent even before they interview her or over a dozen witnesses so she could even run for the presidency? That needs to be investigated. Right now it looks like Bill Clinton met the Attorney General on her private jet and asked her not to charge Hillary and she didn't telling Comey to just call it a matter. Did she make that decision on her own, or did she go higher up to get permission? That needs to be investigated also. Was information held back from the court to get an investigation started against Trump, making it illegal? How soon did Mueller's team know there was no collusion? How soon did they know the dossier was not verified and couldn't be relied on as accurate? Who was involved in pushing the dossier and having to swear to the judge that it was verified accurate? Was the court told that the dossier was bought and paid for by Hillary and the Democratic Party? These questions will be found out and heads will roll.
Here's the report....scroll all the way down to the Conclusion Section...page 182 "..this report does not conclude the President committed a crime.." But to be fair, Vol 2's Conclusion must be read with the understanding that in Vol 1....https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html Concludes that the President and his campaign did not conspire or collude with Russia...you can find that literally in the Introduction Section, in the link above on Page 1, going a little over to Page 2. While you are at those links you might want to read the entire report for yourself.
On page 8 volume II of the Report under the paragraph "Conclusions" It says in the final sentence " Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime it also does not exonerate him. Would you PLEASE tell me how a sentence which clearly says "IT ALSO DOES NOT EXONERATE HIM" exonerates him? (Here I must beg the indulgence of any of our kind readers who would know some way in which I can cut and paste from a PDF document. I would fain quote the entire paragraph so as to show full context but that is far too taxing of my poor typing abilities. Thank you)
We have read enough Trumpster posts to know that race was big factor in Trumpism. Trump played the birther card to the bigots in 2012. He is playing the Mexihate card now. And most of the Trumpsters here on this forum eat it up like catnip.
OK, pal, Point it out. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955290-Mueller-Report-Volume-II-Obstruction.html
I didn't say it did...I simply said that he didn't commit a crime. I mean I don't know that exoneration matters if there was no crime. As Mueller clearly stated in the part you apparently didn't bold.
I literally just did...I gave you step by step instructions and links to find the very important conclusions
Can you think of a time when a prosecutor came out and completely exonerated someone? The only time I can think of was during the Duke lacrosse hoax.
Questioning someone's eligibility to hold the presidency is not racist. Is Maxine Waters racist for wanting Trump impeached before he was even inaugurated? Mexihate? You guys and your words.