Hillary Clinton to give keynote speech at cyber security summit

Discussion in 'United States' started by MolonLabe2009, Jun 1, 2019.

  1. ToddWB

    ToddWB Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    5,401
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well gotta go! There's a big world right out this door and I'm going to enjoy all in my preview.
     
  2. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You did not say she did what? And what did she not leave her fingerprints on? Are you really saying she is guilty because she left no evidence she is guilty.
     
  3. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Enjoy all in your purview!
     
  4. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You asked for proof, I gave you proof. The Clinton Foundation has been their personal slush fund. It's a fake charity.

    If you want to distract with Trump, fine. I see no parallel. I've seen no quid pro quo.
     
    Fred C Dobbs likes this.
  5. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's like you guys don't know squat! Obama unilaterally withdrew missiles from Eastern Europe. He was infamous for leading from behind and proud of it. What concessions did he ever get from Moscow? He told Mitt Romney the 1980's wanted their foreign policy back when Romney said Russia was a geopolitical threat.

    Some people have their heads up their butts!
     
    Fred C Dobbs likes this.
  6. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's an obvious quid pro quo.
     
  7. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you read the bolded part?
     
  8. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    According to the Leftists you must now prove your innocence rather then a court proving your guilt. What if these people ever gain power?
     
  9. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep nothing like an obvious quid pro quo with absolutly no evidence to fuel the conspiracy theorists. Couple that with the fact that Hillary could not have stopped the sale and that there is no evidence of the Clinton foundation money ever benefitting the Clintons and you have the ultimate fruit cake conspiracy theory.

    Not to mention that no uranium ever went to Russia.
     
  10. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How can you observe that fact considering the dark hole where your own head resides.

    https://worldpolicy.org/2009/09/17/news-brief-obama-scraps-east-european-missile-shield/
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2019
  11. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except that the most respected charity rating agency says otherwise. Now the Trump foundation really was a total fraud and was shut down. Now there was a really crooked charity run by a really crooked President for his own financial benefit.
     
  12. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry but it was a right winger who made up facts and then insisted I prove them false. Nice try though. Next time try and follow the thread.

    But just for laughs where did I say you are guilty until you prove your innocence in a court of law. Or are you just being obtuse and deliberatly confusing politics and the court of public opinion with the legal system. Guess you do that because you know a sitting President cannot be indicted so in your mind Trump is innocent of everything because he cannot go to trial and cannot be convicted in a court of law.

    Either that or you just don't understand the difference between impeachment and the American system of justice.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2019
  13. perotista

    perotista Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2014
    Messages:
    16,902
    Likes Received:
    5,680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In a way this makes sense. It's like asking a professional thief to address a law enforcement theft prevention convention. Who knows more about stealing than a professional thief? Who knows more about getting around cyber security than Hillary Clinton?
     
  14. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I saw no 'made up facts' however I did see your \made up' denials. The fact is that the Russians did purchase 20% of US Uranium while Hillary was S of S. You say that the Russians don't have the Uranium but we know it went to Canada and then to Europe. It's not clear where it is now but, because it was purchased by the Russians, we can't rule Russia out.

    As well Bill Clinton received $500,000 speaking fee, plus expenses, for a supposed speaking event in Moscow. Think that would happen now? And the Clinton Foundation received $145 million at about the same time. Think the Russians would be that generous with her now?
    I never quoted you. it was a general, and valid, observation.
    Trump is innocent as a consequence of an extensive two year investigation which found nothing. A sitting President can be indicted.
    I have a fair understanding of both.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2019
  15. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, well seems a bit suspicious to me that y'all claim Trump is Putin's friend when you give a pass to Crooked Hillary and Obama for selling uranium to Putin.
     
    Fred C Dobbs likes this.
  16. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
  17. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What? Did the Russians put money in it in exchange for uranium?
     
  18. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The argument by the leftists seems to be that the Russians paid many millions of dollars, plus bribes, to purchase 20% of US uranium but they're not allowed to touch it, or even look at it.
     
  19. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. That stupidity done. Next
     
  20. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Learn to read!
     
  21. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No uranium went anywhere. That is a fact!

    But curious where you came up with the conclusion a sitting President can be indicted since Mueller said otherwise. Feel free post your Supreme Court decisions to support your imagination.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2019
  22. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeh well why don't you provide the documentation to support his imaginary number?
     
  23. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ToddWB likes this.
  24. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes but if you actually read it you will find a sitting President cannot be indicted. He can be charged but nothing can be done till the President leaves office.

    And as for uranium the conspiracy theorists have been playing this game for awhile. Nothing in the deal gave uranium to the Russians or allowed them to export it from America without the same restrictions that had existed before the sale which Hillary had no control over.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2019
  25. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
     

Share This Page