Philadelphia Falsh Mob Robs a Wallgreens.

Probably, but after that the phone records will provide proof positive that is hard to say is mistaken identity. My whole point here is that keeping a computerized record of a crime you've committed is probably not a good idea.

 

I used to think that, but lawyers can be tricky, remember this case, they knew the ip and aol account used to issue death threats to a Palin critic and said, yeah but no way to know who was sitting at the keyboard, lawyers would just say they did not know who was using the cellphone, then the police have to prove it was them using the cell phone

http://aksyrin.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/death-threat-for-a-palin-critic/

they had the womens aol account, but the police suspended the case?

"After suspending the case, the police department sent McLeod an email noting that the emails the suspect had exchanged with the Anchorage Daily News “would lead a person to believe that the poster” was this Anchorage woman, but that “just because we think we know who owns the IP we have not verified who was actually sitting at the computer at that IP address and posted this threatening communication.” The police also informed McLeod that the attorney general’s office had concluded that there “was nothing [Anchorage Police Department] could do at this point unless [the Anchorage woman], or whoever sent the email, took some act of furtherance toward Ms. McLeod.”

sadly most cases are solved because the person admits it, otherwise it's really hard to prove without video proof and even sometimes then that is not enough

 

Agreed and I would say these people are not the brightest bulb in the box but then I would probably be called a racist.