Man-Made Global Warming Theory Takes Major Hit

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jul 12, 2019.

  1. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure you did. Then you can tell us what percentage of total warming the IPCC claims is the result of AGW.
     
  2. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IPCC.
     
  3. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The calculation of climate sensitivity proves it as well as their charter which only considers AGW.
     
  4. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,581
    Likes Received:
    74,040
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Oh no they didn’t! :p

    Again you are attributing claims without proof

    Mostly you believe that is what is contained in the ipcc reports because someone has said so. Judging from your posts you have never reviewed what the ipcc actually says. In fact you have given no indication you are even aware that there are different reports
     
  5. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,581
    Likes Received:
    74,040
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    What “charter”?
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t make silly assertions. The assertions I do make, I provide evidence for.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  7. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are projecting again. You think that because you refuse to read that everyone refuses to read.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  8. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why does the IPCC exist ???
     
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,581
    Likes Received:
    74,040
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Again no proof you have ever checked out anything for yourself
     
  10. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, you gave me links to government agencies... Government agencies are not science.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  11. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree. Stop making **** up and presenting it as if it were data.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  12. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don’t know why the IPCC exists ??? Stunning.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  13. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yup, he has lost context. I was the one he showed links to... He claims that he linked me to "the science", but he merely linked me to government organizations such as NASA. Government organizations are not science.
     
    drluggit and ToddWB like this.
  14. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Many of them DO have physics and chemistry wrong. They also have logic, science, and mathematics wrong, and reject philosophy as well.

    Science is not a "community" of any sort. Science is simply a set of falsifiable theories. The theories applicable to this thread include, but are not limited to, the laws of thermodynamics and the stefan-boltzmann law. AGW zealots outright reject those theories.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  15. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You didn't show me any science... You showed me links to government agencies. Government agencies are not science.

    I referred you to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, which tells us which direction heat flows. Hint, it is NOT from a colder object to a warmer object, as AGW attempts to claim whenever they claim that CO2 is heating the surface.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  16. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The AGW alarmists claim that the correlation of increasing CO2 concentration with the current warming period proves that increasing CO2 is the forcing factor. This ignores the previous 9 very similar warming periods in the current interglacial Holocene period which occurred with no change in CO2. What the IPCC does is fabricate conclusions based on the current short term climate data whilst ignoring the climate data from both the Holocene and entire climate history. As Ike warned the government has taken over “science”.
     
    ToddWB likes this.
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you didn’t read them. Lol
     
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didn’t. I gave you actual data. You can’t address the data, because it shows you know nothing at all about even the most basic and fundamental scientific principles.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  19. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Better go tell them that then. Your Nobel prize for proving all physicists and chemists wrong awaits, lol.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  20. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are fully aware that I did.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  21. MB74

    MB74 Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2019
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Bowerbird likes this.
  22. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah, the IPCC is a joke, plain and simple. It is not science. It is a government agency.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019
  23. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nope, I did not read them. I don't care what a government agency says, as they are not the proper authority for this discussion... I care about what science itself says...
     
  24. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    8,812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The University of Turku is not credible ???
     
  25. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The government agencies that you linked to did...

    No, you gave me links from government agencies that contained random numbers which were also put into the form of a pretty looking chart. Whoopity doo... That is not data... That is not science.

    There is no data TO address... All there is is random numbers. Global temperature cannot be measured with any reasonable amount of accuracy. If so, tell me how... Global CO2 content cannot be measured with any reasonable amount of accuracy. If so, tell me how...

    I know more about science than most "climate scientists" do... Climate "scientists" are anything BUT...
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019

Share This Page