Man-Made Global Warming Theory Takes Major Hit

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jul 12, 2019.

  1. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sure thing. They can even come on here and read my posts if they'd like...

    Meh... I'm not interested in a Nobel prize. I don't need any formal recognition for my efforts.

    Not ALL physicists and chemists are wrong, but plenty of them are.
     
  2. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Government agencies are not science.

    Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's all science is. You did not discuss any currently standing falsifiable theories with me... You did not discuss any science with me.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019
  3. MB74

    MB74 Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2019
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Fitsnews?
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which means you’re ignorance is intentional.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  5. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Read what I cited and you won’t be so confused.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No they didn’t.


    You didn’t read either source I cited.

    Refuted by the data.

    :roflol::roflol::roflol:

    You don’t even have a grade school level of understanding regarding science. You don’t even know how green house gasses affect temperature.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or you could go through the proper channels, and publish a paper disproving all of physics and chemistry. Lol.


    There is no physicist or chemist that agrees with you. That’s because they are actual scientists, and you apparently failed earth science in 5th grade.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  8. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, it means that I do not consider government agencies to be science.

    I consider the laws of thermodynamics and the stefan-boltzmann law to be science... Want to discuss those with me with regard to "global warming"? Want to define the term "global warming" without it resulting in a circular definition?
     
  9. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You didn't cite any science. I am not interested in a government agency's propaganda...
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because you refuse to read the data that is given to you, you intentionally remain ignorant.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are fully aware that I have repeatedly done so.

    I wouldn’t be either. Which is why I didn’t give you any.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  12. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, they did.

    Correct. There was no need. You are committing a false authority fallacy with those links. Government agencies are not science. Science is the proper source for this discussion.

    WHAT data?? You presented random numbers... How do we measure "global temperature"? How do we measure "global CO2 content"? We have no way of measuring those things...

    Yes, I do.

    [Insert magick gas(es) here] are not capable of warming the Earth's surface. Heat does not flow from cold to hot. See the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
     
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,775
    Likes Received:
    8,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fitsnews has a link to the scientific paper written and issued by the physics department of the University of Turku in Finland. There are many other links on this who also provide the link to the paper. The paper is what is relevant.
     
  14. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You gave me random numbers put into pretty looking charts. That is not data.
     
  15. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    4,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ;) I do know better than to think that I am responding for the sake of that poster. I am responding for the sake of someone else who might stumble across this exchange. Plus, posters like that entertain me. That poster is clearly a fundamentalist member of the Church of Global Warming. His religion requires him to reject logic, science, mathematics, and even philosophy. There's no convincing someone who is THAT fundamentalist in their religious beliefs that they are truly rejecting all those things for the sake of their circularly defined buzzword religion.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019
  16. MB74

    MB74 Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2019
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Your local Maycomb news probably has something like that too.
     
  17. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,775
    Likes Received:
    8,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Okay. It gets boring after awhile. :fishing:
     
  18. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,775
    Likes Received:
    8,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what. The paper is what is relevant.
     
  19. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,871
    Likes Received:
    73,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    But they can and do do science

    If we gave you links to universities would you accept them?
     
  20. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,871
    Likes Received:
    73,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Then who, in your opinion is “the proper austhority”?
     
  21. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,871
    Likes Received:
    73,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Agreed

    One of the worst written pieces of junk I have ever had the displeasure to read. Pure right wing click bait which even the people posting did not vet properly
     
  22. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,871
    Likes Received:
    73,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Wow! And there you are so wrong I do not know where to start

    Well

    A) it is not “a government agency” it is an interbnational agency made up of scientists and lead authors from 187 different countries around the world.
    B) it reviews the science and publishes reports after correlating thousands of research papers
    C) did I say thousands - sure did. One report alone cited over 12,000 research articles

    And THAT is science
     
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They did not.


    You didn’t read it. That’s why you are so confused.

    I haven’t gotten to AGW yet. I’m trying to get you to learn basic grade school science first. You made a very silly and demonstrably false claim about CO2. I corrected you.

    If you did, you would know how green house gasses affect temperature. But you don’t. You made a silly and demonstrably false statement regarding CO2.

    I’ve proven this wrong with 2 separate and unrelated citations.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  24. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No I didn’t. I gave you 2 separate independent sources showing your assertion regarding CO2 and other greenhouse gasses was complete nonsense. It’s basic grade school science.
     
  25. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,775
    Likes Received:
    8,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The government pays for “science” that agrees with its agenda. That is what Eisenhower warned about (along with the military industrial complex) in his final speech as President.
     
    Josephwalker likes this.

Share This Page