Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Man-Made Global Warming Theory Takes Major Hit

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jul 12, 2019.

Page 11 of 20
  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We’re you able to find the section of the IPCC report that states what you claimed yet? Lol
     
    rahl, Jul 18, 2019
    #251
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you would just comprehend what to read you wouldn’t be so confused. I have made no claims regarding global warming in this thread. All I’ve done is correct you about how CO2 affects temperature.
     
    rahl, Jul 18, 2019
    #252
  3. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ehh, don't blame ya for thinking that. :)
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019
    gfm7175, Jul 18, 2019
    #253
  4. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    One doesn't "do" science... Science simply is.

    No, I wouldn't. Universities are not science either. I would accept links to specific theories of science that are currently standing and applicable, such as the laws of thermodynamics and the stefan-boltzmann law.
     
    gfm7175, Jul 18, 2019
    #254
  5. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The theories of science themselves are the proper authority.

    Not government agencies, not universities, not "climate scientists", not "paleoclimatologists", not "peer-reviewed documents", not an "elite voting bloc", not a university course, not any "holy link" or "holy book", and on and on... Rather, the proper authority is the theories themselves.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019
    gfm7175, Jul 18, 2019
    #255
  6. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay, let's dive into it...

    An international government agency IS a government agency. That's exactly what I said...

    It spreads Church of Global Warming dogma; that's all the IPCC does. It rejects science.

    Whoopity doo. Reports are not science.

    No, it's not. It is a government agency preaching Church of Global Warming dogma to the masses. That is not science. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. The laws of thermodynamics are science. The stefan-boltzmann law is science. Planck's Law is science. Those are all parts of the set of falsifiable theories; those are all science.
     
    gfm7175, Jul 18, 2019
    #256
    Josephwalker likes this.
  7. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You truly do want to believe in man caused climate. Does it bother you that if man can regulate climate, none of the bold brave scientists creating such reports used by the IPCC never show you how to do it?
     
    Robert, Jul 18, 2019
    #257
  8. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,565
    Likes Received:
    74,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    And like everything else you post this is just your opinion

    My opinion is that you are so very very wrong it verges into entertainment

    You remarks about the law of thermodynamics are about as valid as Bill oreillys remarks about “tide comes in tide goes out nobody knows what causes that”
     
    Bowerbird, Jul 18, 2019
    #258
  9. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You could have looked at the link to the actual study in the source you deem not to be credible.
     
    Josephwalker, Jul 18, 2019
    #259
    AFM likes this.
  10. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The thread is ABOUT global warming...

    You haven't corrected anything... You are parroting the AGW religious dogma instead of looking at the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics itself.
     
    gfm7175, Jul 18, 2019
    #260
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know. But that discussion can’t begin to take place until you comprehend basic science. Stating that CO2 doesn’t cause temperature to rise is demonstrably false. As I’ve shown you.

    I’ve corrected you numerous times. You have no idea what the second law of thermodynamics says or how it’s applied. This appears to be intentional ignorance on your part because you won’t read the scientific citations you are given. CO2 and other green house gasses cause temperatures to rise. This is a basic, fundamental and grade school level scientific fact.
     
    rahl, Jul 18, 2019
    #261
    MB74 likes this.
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Intentional ignorance is rejecting the entirety of scientific institutions, studies and peer reviewed papers.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2019
    rahl, Jul 18, 2019
    #262
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    8,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your opinion is uninformed. You refuse to educate yourself. That is the essence of faith based religious belief.
     
    AFM, Jul 19, 2019
    #263
  14. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    8,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Irony. ^^^^
     
    AFM, Jul 19, 2019
    #264
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Demonstrate the irony.
     
    rahl, Jul 19, 2019
    #265
    Bowerbird likes this.
  16. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    8,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some people will reject education if the source identifying the specific educational material is not on their approved list. That’s very clear in this thread.
     
    AFM, Jul 19, 2019
    #266
    Josephwalker likes this.
  17. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    8,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ^^^^^^^
     
    AFM, Jul 19, 2019
    #267
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    White flag noted. I accept your concession.
     
    rahl, Jul 19, 2019
    #268
    Bowerbird likes this.
  19. Jimmy79

    Jimmy79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    9,366
    Likes Received:
    5,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How so? Was something I said not accurate?
     
    Jimmy79, Jul 19, 2019
    #269
  20. Nathan-D

    Nathan-D Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2018
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    This is possibly one of the pointless 11 page AGW debates I've seen on any forum. period.
     
    Nathan-D, Jul 19, 2019
    #270
  21. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    CO2 does not cause the temperature of Earth's surface to rise. Earth's surface temperature is ALREADY HOTTER than CO2 is...

    Inversion Fallacy. YOU don't know the 2nd LoT...

    You linked me to government agencies. Government agencies are NOT SCIENCE. The 2nd LoT IS science.

    They do not cause the temperature of Earth's surface to rise. Earth's surface is already hotter than said "greenhouse" gases.

    Not what a 'fact' is. A 'fact' is "shorthand predicate". That's all facts are.
     
    gfm7175, Jul 19, 2019
    #271
  22. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then go elsewhere? You're not being forced to look at nor participate in this thread...
     
    gfm7175, Jul 19, 2019
    #272
  23. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, it is what YOU are doing.

    NASA, IPCC, NOAA, etc. are not "scientific institutions"... They are government agencies. They are NOT science in any way, shape, or form. They all outright reject science.

    Science is not "institutions", it is not "studies", it is not "peer review", nor is it "papers". Science is simply a set of falsifiable theories. The theories support themselves.
     
    gfm7175, Jul 19, 2019
    #273
    Josephwalker likes this.
  24. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’ve proven it does.


    Like the second law, you have no idea what inversion fallacy means.

    I gave you 2 scientific citations. Baseless denials doesn’t change physics.

    I’ve proven this false.

    Much like the 2nd law and inversion fallacy, you also don’t know what a fact is apparently.
     
    rahl, Jul 19, 2019
    #274
    Bowerbird likes this.
  25. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are fully aware your statement above is false.
     
    rahl, Jul 19, 2019
    #275
    Bowerbird likes this.
Page 11 of 20

Share This Page