Active shooter at CA food festival.

The shooters are not victums

 

Good thing I was never talking about them. Where am I losing you? You see dead bodies and you treat them as an opportunity, a means to an ends to attack liberals when we don't even have a motive yet instead of showing respect for the dead. What aren't you seeing about that?

This may be a novel idea, but I repeat: maybe, just maybe their lives are more valuable than your political agenda. Why are you surprised by this concept?

 

Truths,

Canada has one of the most stringent gun laws in the world.

There are almost no mass shootings in Canada.

Do the math....

 

Thus far in all accounts made by the news, no dead body has surfaced. reports of victims treated at a local hospital are mentioned.

 

I have seen plenty of bodies....and many who have made them.....I can do nothing about the dead, except wish they weren't in the line of fire in a Gun free zone. But I can be nasty about the shooter....do you think the left will not use this to ban Guns as soon as someone puts a camera in their face...look a twitter

 

Sometimes I wish goalposts were heavier so that they took a little more effort to shift. But thanks for making it through a whole post without wildly irresponsible speculation to serve your political agenda.

 

Then I'm glad to hear I misinterpreted what was meant by "11 are down." Hopefully it stays that way and the victims make a full recovery.

 

It's what I do.....thanks for the whine

 

Just another day of people exercising their 2nd Amendment Rights in Trump's America. :smh:

My heart goes out to the victims.

 

Thanks for the predatory propaganda trying to take the place of waiting for the facts.

 

I bet it was those damn Amish again. The Second does not give you a right to shoot innocents and 'Orange Man Bad' is lames as a euphemism for reproduction.

 

I agree, so sad the victims couldn't exercise there rights

 

Another link:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-29/shooting-reported-at-californian-garlic-festival/11362478

 

So....it's the fault of the victims some bastard shot them, ey?

 

No. It's sad they could not protect themselves in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness

 

You are correct, but it does give a shooter the right to have his weapon, yes? I wonder if this shooter was licenced to have that weapon and where did he get it from?

 

Straight out of the NRA Bible.

 

In case anyone doubts what I said about that coming straight from the NRA Bible of Bullshit......watch this:



Especially at the 2.15 mark.

 

Does it matter where it comes from if it's right?

 

Yet again......straight from the NRA Bible of Bullshit. Go to the 2.15 mark.

 

Yes it does and it is so wrong. It seems 11 have been shot, people are rightly outraged, and the very first thing we see trotted out is NRA prepared propaganda. Of course the gun issue is as political as it is social, so let's address the problem which is the NRA and bloody guns!

 

aljazeera? Hell no.

 

Too afraid to watch the NRA shoot themselves in the foot?

 

Find a different source. Every click aljazeera gets means more IED's.

 

That is the original source.

 

I would never offer you anything from Fox. I won't entertain aljazeera.