Planned parenthood leaves title x family programs because of abortion rule

Access to the means of avoiding pregnancy is freely available AND free (by saying 'not tonight, dear'), and cheaply available to anyone serious about not having a child and unable to say no. Skip a couple of fast food meals that month and you're covered. Unless you're not serious, of course .. in which case you might spend all your readies on fun stuff and then pretend you can't afford contraception.

 

its objective fact that federal tax dollars do not and can not fund abortions.

 

There is no such thing as an 'unwanted' pregnancy outside of rape.

If she agreed to the unprotected sex, she agreed to the consequences. Protest otherwise and you condemn women with the implication that they're too stupid to make the connection.

 

Pretending it's anything OTHER than killing a baby for your own convenience, is the true horror here.

 

Consenting to sex is not consent to pregnancy. They are 2 entirely separate things.

 

Oh? And yet there are folk here asserting that women are too stupid and feeble-minded to grasp the connection between intercourse and conception.

 

You are literally saying that women don't understand consequences.

Do you hate women generally? Or do you just think we're all impulsive and stupid?

 

No I’m pointing out consenting to sex is not consenting to pregnancy, as those are 2 entirely different things.

Do you think making moronic straw men arguments makes you any less wrong?

 

It's only 'two entirely different things' if you don't know how babies are made. Sorry, your premise is absurd, times ten.

 

Well, it’s not a premise. It’s a biological and legal fact. Over 99.9% of sexual encounters are not related to procreation. Consenting to sex is not consenting to pregnancy. As they are 2 different things.

 

yep, pro-lifers do not support free access to long term birth control options cause it's really about women having sex, not about them having the abortion - this would be the best way to reduce abortions, yet pro-lifers do not support it

ask Palin how well absence only education worked for her daughter

Palin even became the ambassador of Absence education and she got pregnant again

"Bristol Palin Says Abstinence 'Not Realistic at All'"

https://www.foxnews.com/story/bristol-palin-says-abstinence-not-realistic-at-all

"Bristol Palin Earns $262,000 as Abstinence Ambassador"

https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...earns-262000-as-abstinence-ambassador-201154/

"Unmarried Bristol Palin, ‘ambassador for abstinence,’ pregnant again"

https://www.thestar.com/entertainme...ambassador-for-abstinence-pregnant-again.html

 

It doesn't matter how many times you say it, it remains an absurd (and awful) premise. You are saying that adult humans should not be expected to consider consequences. You are basically supporting infantilism.

 

The US tax payer

 

So it is breathing, blood circulation, neural activity?
It can survive on its on?

We disagree on what the word alive means.

 

Again, biological and legal facts are not a premise.

No, I’m pointing out consenting to sex is not consenting to pregnancy.

 

False as has been demonstrated, it's a child, a baby, a person, a human being. And how many abortions happen within the first 6 days anyway?

 

And BTW
New Research Shows Abortion Poses Higher Risk of Death than Giving Birth

For years abortion advocates and researchers have been asserting that an abortion is in fact safer than carrying a pregnancy to term. They contend that pregnancy is a long process and the chance of complications during the gestational period and birth is significantly higher than complications resulting from the abortion procedure. However, a study released this past week demonstrates that this claim is not entirely valid. New research, which takes into account the full reproductive histories of the women involved, illustrates that, compared to women who delivered their babies, women who had an early- or late-term abortion have significantly higher mortality rates within one to ten years of the event.
https://lozierinstitute.org/new-res...poses-higher-risk-of-death-than-giving-birth/

 

Are there clinics that do NOT do the scans prior to abortion? I can't see how else the gestational age of the pregnancy is determined and any clinics not checking are surely putting themselves at legal risk.

 

In order to determine the gestational age of the pregnancy, right?

 

Do ANY? Or is your argument simply that it isn't "FLOCKS?"

 

If they want a safe medical procedure under the state's health system, then why shouldn't they follow the state's procedure?

 

Do you think that someone should be able to walk up to their brain dead family member and kill them?

Temporary sterilisation? That's a thing?

 

I'm asking, what all of a sudden makes it a life AFTER 8 weeks?

 

And take up a life support system which could be used on a child who has a chance of recovery?

 

What about if I'm NOT next of kin?