The technology to make any ammunition within a given distance to spontaneously ignite, is only a few years away. Soon if you are carrying any ammunition and enter a city, the ammo will suddenly go off in your pocket or wherever you have it.
Quote me where I said I’m in favor of banning guns or any alteration of 2A. Your chance of dying could be 0.00001%, but when your son or daughter dies in that even it feels a lot more real than your odds. I don’t support changes in 2A, but I do support some limitations.
Oh, you must have made the mistake of the "we must prove our "needs" to practice our rights. We dont, that's why they are called rights
I just hate anything Russians and/or Communists developed. I prefer American, German, Belgium, Israeli, even Italian weapons.
No one could take post this seriously. We're talking about mass murder, the ramifications of which far outweigh the random vending machine accident.
Sounds like a pretty decent place to live. I’m of the opinion life would be pretty dull without some kind of wildlife to observe.
Today a coopers hawk landed on our deck a few days ago my wife watched a hawk kill a stupid dove midair. It rained feathers. I was out at Lowes and missed it.
I would rather live in a dangerous society than in one where the government can tell me I can’t have the means to defend myself or deter tyranny.
OK here is the entire text “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Kindly show the text which says you are entitled to one weapon and one bullet. From what I read it says the right of the people to keep and bear arms (plural) shall not be infringed.
Liberals have severe reading comprehension problems. That is how their masters have kept them as liberals for so long.
Your rant that comparisons of death causes are "asinine, ridiculous, and just plain foolish and wrong" was obviously in support of opposition to the rights of citizens to own firearms..
BS (with the exception of self defense), That's not why anyone has guns. And you know it. Tyranny? Really?
Why do Mexicans have guns? Oh, that's right. They can't own more than the occasional .22. You know they share a long border with us, right? How is gun control working out for them? Are their police protecting them? https://www.foxnews.com/world/mexico-well-bodies-black-bags-human-remains
No it was not obvious because I do and have always supported our right to own weapons. I just find those silly comparisons of well we should ban champaign bottles because people get shot with the cork to be foolish. Never said to ban guns and I will legally resist giving mine up but I am not stupid or melodramatic and say "you will have to pry my cold dead fingers off the trigger to get my gun".. Some people may choose to die like that most will not.
This statement indicates that the reason for mass shooting are the guns themselves. Until we stop focusing on the guns, and start focusing on what is driving people to this we will never actually solve the problem.
What ramifications? Injury and death are the same regardless of what caused it. Your position is emotional and irrational.
Ruger PC Carbine 9mm. It will accommodate a ten or a seventeen round mag but the seventeen is illegal in Massachusetts.
No. That statement indicates that mass SHOOTINGS are carried out by individuals using AK15 Type guns.