How can homosexuality not be a perversion?

Many sexually "liberated" people get sick from std's. Many die if you count AIDS.
And I do.

If you marry your highschool sweetheart when you are both virgins and stay monogamous, the chances of getting an std are reduced nearly to zero.

That's prudence, not prudishness.

 

Well let's hope more gay people marry their highschool sweethearts then?

I'm all for that and I'm sure it's happening more and more each passing day.

 

How are you protecting the species when a man and woman enjoys oral sex? How about anal sex? Never mind all the other exploratory things a man and a woman can do with each other. Is anything other than the missionary position perverted?

 

You support things like gay marriage bans and other such things. So yes you did.

 

Very few sexual intercourse, leads to procreation.

 

My guess is yes

 

Maybe say that the vast majority of us has been exposed at a minimun to such.

 

Marriage and suing over discrimination is something heterosexual have been doing for decades if not longer. I also corrected your goal post shift of heterosexual to Christian.

 

Oh well if we are using appeal to tradition fallacies, let's also bring back slavery since that also has 100,000 years of cultural tradition.

 

I support freedom to express disapproval of gay marriage as much as the freedom of association which I think was, or should have been, part of Obergfell. I also support the right to say that, while you are free to associate and commit long term to whomever, you do not have the right to demand that society label it as marriage. Civil unions works fine and was supported by the most prominent liberals (looking at you, Barack and Elton) just a decade ago. Now they're all stupid bigots for having said so? I don't think so.

We have to have both freedom of expression and freedom of association or we are not free at all.

 

He said the primary purpose.

 

That's a good point, and yes, as opposed to going off to college and engaging in unrestrained homosexual promiscuity, it's healthier.

 

Duplicate post

 

And sane non-bigoted people have the right to point out you failed logic and homophobia

 

In further answer because I couldn't edit the above post, I agree with this:


Although the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not. The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage. And a State’s decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational. In short, our Constitution does not enact any one theory of marriage. The people of a State are free to expand marriage to include same-sex couples, or to retain the historic definition.

(From Chief Justice Robert's dissent in Obergfell.)

 

Nah, they just have the right make the allegation. But if they do so allege, they are neither sane nor non-bigoted. They are engaged in childish name calling, as are you.

 

Except that the primary purpose is different for different people. For those who aren’t looking to produce a child the primary purpose is enjoyment. Even for those who do have children, the majority of time sex is strictly for pleasure only.

 

Same goes for heteros who go off to college engaging in unrestrained heterosexual promiscuity.

 

That is unbelievably illogical

Because homosexuals are a rising power on the left the rest of us have to pretend that some of them dont rape boys?

No thanks

I see the world as it really is

 

In most cases yes

More often than conservative

Just look at the commie pope

 

Do you think homosexuals populated the earth?

And that was all accomplished with sex between a man and a woman

 

There is. nothing in the Constitution about homosexuals

That issue is being ruled by 6 or 7 unelected liberal demigods who invent rights to suit the occasion

 

It appears that at one time girls of seven could be married

But I’m sure it was rare and they could not otherwise engage in sex

And that was not a “tradition” in thevsame sense of tradational martiage between one man and one woman

But more of just a strange quirtk in the law

 

Both

Homosexual sex was viewed as disgusting and aldo was against the law

 

Yes

7 unelected demigods overruled 300 million citizens