Trump mocks teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg

What a **** meme.

 

Never claimed to be an authority on all of climatology. But I can assure you many of the claims of what climate change will do to food supplies are not accurate.

 

How far into the future are you predicting?

 

Wow a 3-4 year drought? That’s unheard of and certainly frightening!

You do realize that a “greener” earth overall will actually reduce drought?

Do you realize we are able to “evolve” to take advantage of variations? Do you think climate change is already impacting my ability to feed you? If so, is it a negative or positive effect? If it isn’t impacting yet, when will it?

 

I’m not predicting time tables. I’m claiming the direct effects on agriculture of climate predictions are erroneous. The interactions between climate and agriculture I’m referring to are independent of time.

 

Fascinating. I remember Mobutu.

However, I've never heard of that colored ballot thing before. Very creative - great way to sniff out opposition in a "democracy".

 

Wow, any topic whether it is climate change or mass extinction can be diverted to immigration if you want it to.
Are there so few threads on immigration that you have to crowbar your personal hobby horse into completely unrelated threads?

 

Yes, but if you're not a member of the one ruling Party and you're fortunate to live in a one party democracy like the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (gotta love how the Kimsters packed "Democratic" and "Republic" in there), you get to dwell outside the capital and experience all the simple joys of Medieval living, unencumbered by the corrupting influence of luxuries such as electricity, running water and food.

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

I answered your previous 3 questions noting I'm not here to be interrogated. And yet you go forth with interrogating by not disputing a thing, just asking 6 more questions. I'll be passing on this. You got nothing to dispute.

 

https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2017/01/democratic-elections-in-a-one-party-regime

 

read post 611

 

She is so much more advanced than her critics that they seem like dust bunnies by comparison.

 

Yes, passing is probably wise. You’ve made demonstrably false statements answering my original questions, and are unable to follow up on your accusation of denialism. Seems to be a popular way to address this issue. Good luck next time.

 

Did you read the first paragraph of your link ??

 

It reads...
PhD candidate Wang Zhongyuan investigated how the Communist Party uses this democratic instrument to strengthen the authoritarian regime.

 

You got nothing to debunk. You only show you don't know anything about the subject and demand I bring you up to par. That is not a debate. That is an interrogation. My arguments stand, because you got nothing.

 

Takes somebody special to mock a person with asperger.

 

When adults make racist accusations based on nothing to make a personal attack on a handicapped person....
that's when you know they really got no arguments against that handicapped person.

 

It is sad this girl has been fed lies about climate change. That is child abuse.

 

Since when is emotional blubbering being "advanced". Show me the science or just stay silent. Emotional appeals are meaningless.

 

I have Asperger's myself. Feel free to sod off with you bull.

 

Nope. I remain at my position that it takes somebody special to mock the disability of a handicapped person instead of trying to argue against her opinion. That must be the lowest form of a personal attack.

right back at ya.

 

Only a handful of scientist on the payroll of the oil industry supports your cause.

 

If you're going to make a statement in public people are free to mock it. Autistic or not. Child or not. It is irrelevant if she is handicapped or not.

She's entering the arena of debate/discussion and into the public sphere. And as such I am free to mock this brainwashed puppet as much as I like.