She isn't president! But you guys keep talking about how she won the popular vote! lol! "WHATABOUT!" Alt left radicals at their finest lol!!!
I don’t and if you look the only ones bringing up Hillary are the right. Indeed in this thread which is NOT about Trump you were the first to bring up Hillary as a Whataboutisms defence because someone dared to point out that Trump shifts blame
So you're admitting that you alt leftists use whataboutisms for Trump but it doesn't work against you. Sorry you lost. lol maybe not
Ah! Now we have the ruse of deliberate misinterpretation of a post No mat you own this one - the thread had nothing to do with Trump there was a side comment and you came roaring in with a whataboutism and then tried to defend it by claiming a further whataboutism But I need not argue further I will just leave the conclusions to the others on this site
FoxHastings said: ↑ With Trump, it's always someone else's fault.... Why? Does she give examples of Trump taking responsibility for his own actions?? I doubt it, he never has.... LOL! My,my, the imagination overinflation !!! WHERE did I indicate I worship Hillary?? NO WHERE.... WHERE did I indicate I worship Hillary?? NO WHERE.... Can you SHOW where? NO you can't so you know what that makes you I proved you right??? About what? Your vivid but erroneous imagination? WTF has what Hillary wrote got to do with the FACT that TRUMP never accepts personal responsibility for his own actions???? IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE BLAMING HILLARY FOR TRUMP NOT BEING ABLE TO accept personal responsibility for his own actions!!! SEE THE IRONY
Generally, I just throw the quote back at them when they themselves do it. Y'know, just for laughs. But I haveta get ready for work now, so - maybe later. As for eating babies - hmm. Generally with a white wine.
I acknowledge you got it in first, but I hadn't read yours when I responded. I respond to threads post by post from the start. I don't read through them all, and then respond.
Thuroughly disgusting and evil.. better to have a warmer climate. Than to stoop to such demonic measures.
The point is, your grandchildren might otherwise starve to death. They will need food. Rightes are making sure they won't have any. So what do you tell your grandchildren if the time comes: starve to death, or eat people? Makes green technology look relatively friendly, eh? Well, now the deniers have stalled progress too long and drastic actions will be needed for people to survive. Glad I won't live to see it.
It would be better to starve to death than to commit such crimes and if this is where science is headed then science has lost it's way and needs correction. Should I is equally important as can I .
It is math, not science. It isn't a goal. It is a calculated prediction based on facts. It is a consequence. Don't kill the messenger.