1st A - Nahh, who wants that... Kamala H Calls for Twitter to Silence Trump and Delete His Account

Mind bending is 'great' if done on one's private time / 'dime'... "Bending" the Constitution at a national level... yehhhh, we might want to explore that notion...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-democrats-continue-to-sht-on-bill-of-rights/

 

Congress shall make no law...

Which has somehow been amended by reinterpretation into no citizen or state shall take an action such.

 

I be Kamala Harris. Dey ain't be cheetin' enuff fer me. Taint enuff. I wants maw.

 

My suggestion for the author? Retake his 7th grade civics class. He doesn’t understand the purpose of the US Constitution.

 

Harris's statements are an insight into the minds of the Dems...they want to shut out any speech that is disagreeable to their agenda....Stalinist is what they are

 

That kind of thinking is prevalent in all three major US political parties. The Democrats do it, the Republicans do it, and the Trump Cultist Party ( TCP) does it.

 

Please try to explain what you are blathering about.

 

Well they are all Stalinist then....

 

You do understand that the Constitution doesn't cover the operations of a private business just the Federal govt.?

 

So how you think is representative of everyone on this forum?
I hardly think so.. Try again...

 

So my first amendment right is violated if this forum bans me? Lol

 

Odd, didn't know there was such a third party...likewise, I only hear it from the Stalinst running for the DNC nom

 

No, not everyone.

 

Does it bother you that you don't actually understand the constitutional framework? Does it simply escape your understanding that the states, themselves all uniformly support the federal constitution in their own? I know, you didn't know this, nor likely, does it make a difference to folks, like you, who find that freedom is intolerable in others. When ms Kamala asks as a sitting US senator for a business to restrict the rights of others, clearly, this doesn't trigger you, but turn the script slightly and wonder how you'd be reacting if it was someone like Mitch demanding that CNN restrict the speech of Kamala.. No doubt you'd have a different reaction.

 

Then why would you illogically claim Ms. Harris speaks for a body of several hundred?

 

Because she does...her supporters....not everyone on this forum supports her

 

All of us that incur a ban should sue for our Constitutional rights!

 

Then show us proof how she speaks for every Democrat in Congress please.

 

Before one can be logical one must be rational...

 

I assume that if you felt strongly enough about it, you'd sue the forum using that logic. I would suggest that there is a significant difference though in the audience size of those who reads your posts and the Presidents tweets. And because the president is not relying on the press to distribute his message for him anymore, the liberal folk are confounded by his unwillingness to tolerate their unilateral bias and their religious zealous persecution of him. But you don't suffer that here, on this forum.

 

I'll be glad when society realizes exactly how meaningless public communication has become. Whomever generates the most outrage garners the most attention. You don't say things you mean. You say things that gather attention. The news media, politicians, social media. It's all just a collection of children screaming LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT MEEEE! LOOK WHAT I CAN DO!

 

I would NEVER kick Trump off of Twitter.. he'd be even more dangerous without it than he is with it..

Just ignore him... its really not that hard to do..

 

Again, I think you should read what I posted......

 

The crazy thing is that of all the things the left criticizes Trump for, some of his tweets are one of the few things which sometimes deserve criticism. Harris might be doing Trump a favor in the long run if she blocked his tweeting, LOL.

 

To establish limits on the federal government.