Schiff Staffer’s Meeting With Impeachment Witness Marked Turning Point in Ukraine Controversy

What is really sad is that you have swallowed the deep state conspiracy, hook, line, and sinker.

 

Looks pretty legit?

They were just under investigation by the Ukrainian government, to the point where Biden said on live TV that they should stop and put in the prosecutor he wanted.

The prosecutor he wanted is rich, drives a Bentley. The one you fired? Yeah, he is poor living in a little cottage....

YOU ARE DEFENDING EVIL PRO WAR BANKERS!!!

Why? I honestly don't get it? Why do you hate Trump stopping wars? Why do you hate Trump taking on International Bankers who are draining America's lower class so they can pass it out to the rest of the world?

All so the higher up International CEO's can make more money.

Why? Serious question, why do you support what is obviously bad for

All this stuff about Giulianni means literally nothing, he was/is a private attorney, investigating a case against his client.

Do you really think a President doesn't get legal counsel? Is that what you are trying to defend?

 

"The Clinton Foundation has over 150 thousand different donors/groups. I'd be surprised if you could find a major political figure who wasn't involved in some form or fashion. Heck, Trump donated 100k to the Clinton foundation. Does that make him suspect too?"

You're missing the point. I haven't seen any report that Downer contributed. He only helped to transfer taxpayer dollars.

It was a scandal in Australia.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/219577919ed8dfbd79cf808321234eba

He helped get the Clinton Foundation 25million Australian dollars and he happened to end up in a bar with Papadopoulos just after Mifsud told him something.

What a coincidence!

 

I remember Obama being blocked wherever he could be but I don't recall hearing calls for impeaching him or removing him from office through any means other than the vote.

 

Dear lord, didn't attack Popodopolous? You called him a drunk. YOU ARE SPREADING FALSEHOODS.

The rest of your post is just drivel, calling people you disagree with "conspiracy theorists"

Get over it, that narrative lost and it's over.

The NewYorkTimes, Huffington post, all of them, they have finally agreed that the Deep State is real.

They are now switching the narrative that "They are the good guys and Trump is evil".... even though they have promised us for years that it is just a "conspiracy theory"

So which is it? Or have you not been told by your International Banker overlords yet, what to say?

Last but not least .... are you really defending the Clinton Foundation, ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!??!

The Clinton Foundation dropped from 2016 $63 million, to 2017 at $24 million.

"
Right before Hillary Clinton announced her intent to run for the White House, the New York Times published a piece explaining how she, as Secretary of State, approved a sale which allowed 20 percent of U.S. uranium to be transferred to the Russian government.

Although the Clinton State Department was one out of eight Obama administration agencies to look over the deal, Hillary Clinton was the only head of an Obama administration agency whose foundation directly benefited from the sale.

The New York Times reported that Clinton’s family foundation— the Clinton Foundation— received $145 million in contributions from donors involved in the sale."

Who were the biggest donors? Hmmm, well, one thing is for sure.

We now know for a fact that Ukraine was one of the biggest donors of the Clinton Foundation, the same nation that just had an election based solely on Corruption, where the Clinton funded ex President Poroshenko lost TO A COMEDIAN to the tune of 73% to 24%.

https://rightedition.com/2019/10/04...ash-of-any-country-to-the-clinton-foundation/

You are defending the corrupt and I am not sure why

 

Wobblin like big jerry naddler...

 

Dont forget them Blackberrys.

 

Huh. So I went to other links then the one you posted to have a look at this. Oh what a shocker, the assistance to transfer the money was in 2006. Over a decade ago. And Again, Trump himself donated to the Clinton Foundation, so having that simple link isn't really meaningful.

No?

Should google it sometime. Here is the wiki page devoted to this specific topic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_impeach_Barack_Obama

Lots of calls, but nothing substantial. Even Boehner ruled it out at the time. When the leading Republican in a Democrat Administration advises against calling for Impeachment in an election year, you know there isn't much to it.

First: I said he WAS drunk, not that he was A drunk. A very subtle, yet distinct difference. Also, it was in the report that they were wasted.

Second: Who are these international bankers you keep talking about?

Third: 7 different agencies had to sign off on the Nuclear deal, including a Utah state nuclear regulator. Care to explain how she managed to get a republican regulator to sign off on her 'corrupt deal'?

The Clinton foundation has been investigated numerous times, and always found nothing. it had a high rating from charity raters, and is just a demagogue for the right to flog everytime it needs to wail against the Eeeeeevvviiiilll Clintons.

you'd think after...what...almost 20 years of railing against her, multiple republican majorities/administrations, and literally Nothing has come of it, you'd realize you were being had. Are they career politicians who have fingers in a ton of pies? Sure. Are they any different then any other politician who's been in politics for that long? No.

 

You mean the one that just got upgraded to a criminal investigation?

 

Funny how that foundation went kaput after the Clinton's had no more influence to peddle.

Deliberately destroying those subpoenad emails was AOK, huh?

 

"Huh. So I went to other links then the one you posted to have a look at this. Oh what a shocker, the assistance to transfer the money was in 2006. Over a decade ago. And Again, Trump himself donated to the Clinton Foundation, so having that simple link isn't really meaningful."

There's a statute of limitations on proving connections? Seems weak, to me.

Somebody with connections to the Clintons just happens to be in a position to help the Clintons.

Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world he just happened to walk in the one Papadopoulos was in.

How far can credulity be stretched?

 

More word games that mean nothing.

You attack people you disagree with, then get in a little child tamper tantrum when people do the same to you.

Typica NeoCon and NeoLib strategy.

More "whatboutism" even though I have clearly told you the difference between people that are for the Deep State and people against. Your attempt to obfuscate by calling "Rich People" the problem is now known and laughed at.

You guys have nothing, just the precious "narrative" that is spread by schools, media and entertainment.

You guys are toast

 

Their precious "message" is crumbling

It's hilarious to watch them try to defend it.

 

Kaput? Nah. Just a deep nose dive in donations. Your thinking of Trumps foundation that was shut down and they were barred from running a charity from stealing from kids. The Clintons were investigated, and cleared. Did people donate to their foundation hoping for something in return? Highly Likely. Were there specific agreements to have donations come in and favors doled out? Highly Unlikely. Why create an agreement when the donation is the biggest indicator?

Nope. And she should have fried for it. Unfortunately, IT matters seem to be a mystifying world to many so it fell to the wastebasket of history.

You seem to think that I think Clinton was this bastion of goodness. She wasn't. I just don't see her as this demagogue that the Right has for decades.

 

Again, nothing. They are grasping at straws trying to call people they don't like names

"I didn't call him a name, I just happened to throw in 'that he was drunk' into a conversation"

Hahaha, why?!?!?

Oh right, so you can plan your previous "narrative/message", trying to claim they are the only moral arbitors of the nation.

 

Right. Because anything that goes against what you think are just 'word games'. Enjoy your bubble dude.

 

Then prove they are not, you haven't said anything OTHER than word games.

Meanwhile, I am giving you articles, quotes, dates, donations.

You literally have nothing, and your personal attack against me calling my opinions "babble" show that all you and your ilk have is personal attacks.

I honestly feel sorry for you

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/...-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html
'just happened to throw it into the conversation'

Blame the Times and every other news agency who reported that they were drinking when he talked. Jebus.

 

Right, because my post wasn't filled with counter arguments that you ignored entirely. cool story bro...

 

Your argument is "Clinton was not that bad"

Then you go on and on about how you hate Trump

You have literally zero credibility with such a statement. Furthermore, I went over every one of your topics, you just refuse to actually listen.

Meanwhile, you don't respond to ANYTHING that I said, just more attacks and obfuscations.

Pathetic

 

You do realize that Papadopolous was highly involved in Isreals energy program right? And the lady who arranged the meeting between the two is Erika Thompson, who was a political counselor at Australia's London High Commission and whose partner, Chris Cantor worked for the isreali Govt for a long time. Cantor introduced Downer and Popadopolous. It wasn't lke they just randomly ended up at the same bar for no reason. Jebus.

 

REally? So how did Clinton get the Utah Nuclear Regulator to sign off on the sale? Must of missed that one.

And No, I don't hate Trump. I don't '...anything' Trump. But you seemed to think that having a charity was bad, yet somehow hers was cleared from investigations and his was shut down.

 

How did Clinton ( a Deep State actor) get a regulator in a Deep State funded organization to "sign off"?

Gee, I have no clue ....

The Clinton Foundation was not a charity, if you are saying that you are in the SEVERE minority of people who think so.

 

So basically; a nothingburger.

 

So what your saying is, somehow Clinton got a local Utah energy regulator in one of hte single most republican states at the time, to support her corruption?

And your evidence of that is just to continue screaming 'deep state'?

Yeah good luck with that.

And it was registered as a charity. Charity watchdog groups gave it solid ratings. But i guess everyone must have been paid off right?