Ex-White House official testifies he wasn't concerned 'anything illegal was discussed'

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by camp_steveo, Oct 31, 2019.

  1. Wrathful_Buddha

    Wrathful_Buddha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    1,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course we're "well beyond a transcript" becuase orange man bad. No amount of evidence will ever satisfy you. You'll just move on to something else because you don't like the president the people have chosen and you will stop at nothing to force your will upon the people.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  2. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You misunderstand. The Transcript is damning in and of itself. But we also have a whole host of other evidence to support and complement the damning transcript.
     
  3. Wrathful_Buddha

    Wrathful_Buddha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    1,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only a person with TDS thinks the transcript is damning.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  4. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Vindman, the Whistleblower, the person who spoke to the Whistleblower, and the ICIG all have TDS in your mind?

    Is there a single person that is willing to criticize Trump who does not suffer from TDS, in your mind?
     
  5. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it isn't about that fantasy.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  6. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How much do you all want to bet Shifty blocks this guy from testifying publicly?
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  7. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,206
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you mean Caitlyn :)
     
    Wrathful_Buddha likes this.
  8. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    hahaha that's the point....Mr. Z saying he felt no pressure, and in fact didn't even know of the delay...proves there was no quid pro quo for anything.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  9. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That isn't relative.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  10. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Can you please provide that piece of testimony saying there were "material omissions"....thanks.

    Ukraine said they felt no pressure. But I am glad you are beyond the transcript...just like you are beyond the Russia hoax.....maybe the next door will be what you are looking for.....hahahha
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  11. Wrathful_Buddha

    Wrathful_Buddha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    1,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, those people have other motivations for saying what they say. They're just there to say the transcript doesn't say what it says, and Trump and Zelensky don't know what they said to each other.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  12. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess it's potentially damning if you are Hunter Biden and you have stuff to worry about
     
  13. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
  14. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How do those statements, which were about the phone call (i.e. did not include the rest of the full on campaign to get Ukraine to investigate) and not made under oath by the way, prove that no quid pro quo existed?
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2019
  15. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
  16. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,185
    Likes Received:
    62,819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no, it would be like Trump murdering someone on 5th ave and it caught on video and then someone says he did not do it

    the partial transcript proves he did it, be interesting to see the full transcript
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2019
  17. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does Quid Pro quo mean? Something for something.

    If there was no deal, there was no quid pro que. nothing was condictioned on anything according to Ukrainian.

    Shifty should bring him to testify then
     
  18. Wrathful_Buddha

    Wrathful_Buddha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    1,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is something else entirely.
     
  19. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,177
    Likes Received:
    12,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it is absolutely about Trump's discretions.
     
  20. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,177
    Likes Received:
    12,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it is.
     
  21. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe that's a typo?
     
  22. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump mentioning recordings of former vice president Joe Biden discussing Ukraine corruption and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s explicit mention of Burisma Holdings, the company that had Biden’s son Hunter on its board.

    Do either of those omissions reach the level of important, meaningful, or material to you?
     
  23. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,177
    Likes Received:
    12,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe?

    Anyways, this is about Trump's discretions.
     
  24. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,185
    Likes Received:
    62,819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Ex-White House official testifies he wasn't concerned 'anything illegal was discussed'"

    he did not say anything illegal did not occur, just that he was not concerned, that must be why the white house staff removed part of the transcript they found concerning and hid it in a top secret server
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2019
  25. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again, do those statements, which were about the phone call (i.e. did not include the rest of the full on campaign to get Ukraine to investigate) and not made under oath by the way, prove that no quid pro quo existed?
     

Share This Page