GOP senators prepared to acknowledge quid pro quo, plan to argue it was legal

Not quite true from what I have been able to read. It was said to be inactive for 12 months before Biden Snr told Ukraine to get rid of the very idling Prosecutor Shokin, if Ukraine wanted US aid. It makes no sense that Biden would do that if he was in any way concerned that Biden Jnr was in any strife. If he did think that, would he not let the sleeping bear stay asleep?

 

From Schiff for Brains......no thanks I'll wait till they do it again on C-Span cameras.

 

Will you accept it then?

 

Keep reading on the subject. Investigation shut down for lack of evidence

Evidence which Giuliani couldnt find because it doesn't actually exist

 

No, from people that worked for donnie

They're all starting to leave the Titanic

 

what does that have to do with using Congressial approved loan guarantees as leverage to remove a Ukrainian prosecutor?

 

Ask Obama and all of Europe and the IMF.

 

You seriously can't put 2 and 2 together??

Biden was furthering the interests of the US, who along with all of its allies wanted the crooked prosecutor gone

Compared with pee boy who thought the aid was his to use to extort a foreign leader for his own selfish interests

One a patriot, the other a traitor

 

1) No Quid pro Quo
2) Okay but it was Legal
3) Okay but its not impeachable
4) Okay but …..HILLARY!

 

Are these select portions of the transcripts?
Still, I think they already know this is a dud. Now the Dems are pivoting to his taxes.

 

So you didn't bother to find any credible sources so as to inform yourself of the relevant subject matter.

Got it!

 

Errr, you didn't notice that your "credible sources" are not anymore? Example:

 

I 100% agree (except for the Biden comment)

And Trump had corrupt intent... what is your point?

 

Than you for confirming that you do NOT have any credible sources.

Furthermore SPAMMING the thread with videos that no one has the time to waste watching is only harming your own credibility.

 

I would write that these guys are getting the story right and you dismiss them. But PBS? Paid for by the Establishment? You find them totally credible.
Well, that's old thinking and no longer works. Sorry your blue pills are losing their potency.

 

Puerile ad homs further degrades your credibility.

 

Trump's people prepared the transcripts from the closed door sessions? Really?

 

Was Biden not suspected of criminal activity with respect to Ukraine ?

What is the corrupt intent in asking Ukraine to investigate ?

 

Not at all...

See my first response to answer your 2nd question...

 

Actually no Biden was not. I've not heard anyone level an accusation of illegal activity. Did I miss it?

 

As usual, you have things backwards.

 

He's been criticized for this before he ran for POTUS. It is a crime for a public official to use their position to enrich a relative. Hunter's last name was the sole reason he was hired while his dad was in charge of Ukraine affairs. This isn't made up dirt, like the peeing hooker and Trump lie.

 

Link to anyone accusing Biden of an actual crime. I've not seen it.

 

LOL... you are all over the place with that, my friend.... I suggest a deep breath and a cold beer, then starting again...

 

Which is an admission that you don't have squat.

A lame attempt to substitute your vile inferences for actual evidence for your fantasies.

Yup, before the end of the quarter, Ukraine had our money, with none of the conditions you folks are claiming to be attached to it.

That's not evidence, that's your rational for your LACK of evidence.

Evidence of WHAT crime exactly? Cite the CFR number please